this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
279 points (98.9% liked)

politics

20345 readers
4346 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will reportedly face a lawsuit from National Security Counselors shortly after Donald Trump’s inauguration.

The lawsuit alleges DOGE violates the 1972 Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which mandates transparency, balanced representation, public access, and proper documentation for White House advisory committees.

DOGE, aimed at cutting $2 trillion in federal spending, has not followed these requirements.

Critics have called Musk's budget-cutting goals unrealistic, as they would likely impact protected programs like Social Security and Medicare, which Trump has vowed to preserve.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crazyslinkz 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trump has vowed ...

I'm sure we can take that to the bank, he never goes back on his word.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Efficiency means not following the rules. Getting things done faster, but ultimately shittier, because you're rushing it. Making quick descions even though you don't have enough information to make a good one.

[–] Sludgehammer 17 points 1 month ago

Yeah, sounds like Musk.

[–] Tujio 11 points 1 month ago

Boss: "How did you get this done already?"

Me: "I upped efficiency by employing clever time-saving techniques."

Boss: "So you cut corners."

Me: "Hell yeah I did."

[–] MolecularCactus1324 51 points 1 month ago

Thank you. Also, fuck the media for reporting on DOGE like it’s already some official government agency.

[–] BlameTheAntifa 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don’t worry, silly things like law or Constitution don’t hold any power now. His Majesty King Trump is above such things.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Musk is gonna run DOGE like he runs everything else...fast and loose. Let the bugs run out in production and chase 'em there.

s/bugs/lawyers

One thing about musk...he shoots first and asks questions later. He is the embodiment of asking for forgiveness instead of permission. That can be a good trait in some circumstances, but not really in running a government agency.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

The lawsuit alleges DOGE violates the 1972 Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)

I vote that we rename this by switching "Federal" to "Civil." Then we can sue DOGE for violating CACA. And then I can have one last chuckle before everything burns.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No mention of Vivek Ramaswamy?

Don’t forget the oxymoronic Department of Government “Efficiency” has two heads… 😂

[–] Xanthobilly 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He already announced he’s leaving DOGE to go run for Governor of Ohio.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Is he going to co-govern Ohio too? 🤣

Holy shit. Ohio is around 100% white racist assholes, I don’t think they’ll embrace Vivek there.

[–] jaybone 2 points 1 month ago

Serious? That was fast.

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 1 month ago

...and it's also entirely redundant. That function is already done by a real government agency, not the bullshit broligarchy project run by Elon (and maybe Vivek but I saw a rumor he may quit).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ain't nothing gonna happen.

[–] Dragomus 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am legit curious, the department did not exist prior to the inauguration, it needs to be legalized first, with new laws and regulations that give it actual power, no? So how can they sue it the second after the inauguration of the new president?

Or does it magically get legal power and existence because 2 citizens (musk and trump) say so?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

It seems like a rational move to sue, because it likely may never be given formal power and may be exercising it regardless. That's because Trump will not ask for anyone's permission to do a thing unless he absolutely has to.

Where we see institutional authority and mandate by following a process, Trump sees it as preemptive capitulation to restrictions on power. That's why the firehose of falsehoods and insane conduct is so effective - it may sound trite to say it, but every crazy thing he says/does that is beyond our ability to hold him accountable is one additional thing he is beyond accountability for.

[–] Nightwingdragon 4 points 1 month ago

Or does it magically get legal power and existence because 2 citizens (musk and trump) say so?

Ding Ding Ding.

And it gets the rest of its power from the Department of "What the fuck are you going to do about it?"