this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
384 points (98.0% liked)

Star Wars Memes

11869 readers
115 users here now

Hello there. Somehow, Star Wars memes have returned. It's not a trap, this is where the fun begins.

==========

Other universes to visit:

[email protected]

[email protected]

Separatist systems:

[email protected]

Oh hey some real SW content for a change (perhaps):

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

==========

IMPORTANT

Please do not post the "good friend" or similar copypasta

==========

Our galactic citizens have requested more specific rules, so here are a few.

The general idea is, if you're looking here for rules, you're probably someone who doesn't need to have them spelled out. You're fine. But anyway:

  1. This is a community for Star Wars memes. This means typically screenshots of Star Wars media with some text or context that's meant to be funny and/or thoughtful. All SW media is welcome: movies, games, comic books, fanart... Other kinds of content, like video links or meta memes (about this community, or Lemmy), are fine as well, just keep it on topic.

  2. We are all friends here, and love (sometimes love to hate) Star Wars. Be nice to each other.

  3. As fans of fictional media, we can be passionate. If you very strongly disagree with something or someone, take a deep breath before reacting. Anger leads to the dark side!

  4. Everything in Star Wars has happened a long time ago, in a galaxy far away, and it's a rich universe of millions of words and millions of years of history. So current Earthly matters really shouldn't concern us here. In other words, leave politics, philosophies and convictions behind the door. This applies even if it's about something related to Star Wars.

  5. Original content is preferred. Reposts are fine, just please limit to a maximum of 3 per day, per citizen. It is recommended, but not required, to mark original memes as (OC) and reposts as (repost).

  6. Local mods are the Jedi council. They may take actions that are necessary to maintain peace and stability of the Republic, even beyond the rules outlined here. Follow their guidance.

  7. Regular rules of the Lemmy.world instance apply.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I still have never been able to see white and gold

[–] kitnaht 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can only see the white/gold when it's color-corrected like this, and I think some people just have some form of auto-exposure correction in their minds. If I remember correctly, the original photo is the one on the right.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Original photo is the left one but the right depicts the proper colors.

[–] kitnaht 6 points 1 week ago

Shit now I'm questioning my entire reality...

[–] Feathercrown 3 points 1 week ago

What's funny is, color-correcting should remove yellow/white light, making it MORE blue/black

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

its because the background gives the impression of bright yellow incandescent lighting but in order to see the dress as white gold you have to assume it's under entirely different (low diffuse white) lighting conditions than the rest of the image implies

[–] SkunkWorkz 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Isn’t it because your brain assumes the dress is in the shadow and only lit by the ambient light from the sky. Hence why the brain color corrects the blue to white since ambient light from the sky is slightly blue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah you’d have to perceive it as being lit from sunlight under shade, cloud cover, or possibly a skylight. I doubt it has much to do with an intuitive understanding of rayleigh scattering and more just that, in person, your brain would have more temporal context and a wider visual field to model the lighting with than what the image gives you. The floor and the ceiling would be blue in your peripheral and you’d have more angles and depth perception to work with so the distance between and relative strength of the yellow light and white light source would be more obvious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's a great video on how effects like these work.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wh4aWZRtTwU

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In contrast, I have never been able to see blue and black, even though that's objectively what it is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

One day we're going to figure out why and all other forms of prejudice will cease to exist and be replaced with the one true differentiator of human quality.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

blue and black. Don't see how it could be white 🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And I don't see how it could be blue and black...

Well, ok, that's not entirely true, I can see how in GIMP:

The colors are basically exactly in between white/gold and blue/black respectively.

And I can see a very, very faint blue tint on the white, just as it "should be", according to GIMP. But it doesn't click to another color entirely for me, especially not pitch black and dark blue.

[–] Feathercrown 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It doesn't look like dark blue. Which is interesting-- the color it appears to be is about as far from dark blue as it is from white. But, correcting for the harsh glare, it's blue (as we now know it really is).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, I assumed dark blue and pitch black because of the image in the post.

And it's debatable wherever that can be considered blue or gold. Both are objectively very faint/light, apparently.

[–] Feathercrown 3 points 1 week ago

What I mean is, the physical dress is blue+black

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The image on the right is a recreation of what it would have looked like if the lighting wasn't the way it was.

Here's an actual image of the real colors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It's blue and black

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I still have never been able to see blue and black

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kernelle 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

At the top of the left one I could definitely see why people would think the black part is gold due to the lighting and exposure. I've never been able to grasp how people see white though, for me it's like saying a bluebird sky is white.

Edit: the wiki article on this is amazing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Thanks. Simply by looking at this image from the wiki, I was able to finally see it in blue and black. Once I focused on the color of the illumination, I was able to start seeing it correctly. And then I can switch back to seeing it in white and gold by zooming in completely on the black/gold section for a second.

The image actually explains how people see white as well. Both the white and blue sections inside of the colored squares are the exact same color.

The picture (the one in the OP, not the one I linked) has always been super weird to me, because if you invert the colors of the dress then it IS gold/white. Meaning the white/gold dress (in my eyes) would become gold/white when inverted, which made absolutely zero sense lol.

[–] aido 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Well, I can't say I'm surprised lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That is a great image.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

My name is not ‘Data,’ it’s ’Data.’

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

One is my name. The other is not.

[–] Zachariah 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

it’s pronounced “gif”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah! With a “g” sound. Like “Ginger” and “Garfield”.

[–] themeatbridge 9 points 1 week ago

It is pronounced gif and I'm tired of pretending it's not.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

"they're the same picture"

[–] amon 12 points 1 week ago
[–] cholesterol 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This picture made me feel incredibly weird. I see blue and brownish - we can call it gold. Like, I see the same colors you'll see if you do an average color extraction over the image using an image processor. There's no color illusion for me at all. The whole world went mad in two camps and I'm in neither.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're in the blue and black camp. I get what you mean, it's sort of a yellowish brown, but that's why the illusion is there in the first place. Some people's brains adjust it to a more yellow color instead of more of a black/dark brown.

[–] cholesterol 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I appreciate your answer. But aren't you just in my camp, maybe? If some people in the blue/black camp see a yellowish brown, why do they call it black? And why do they insist it's the only way the image could be interpreted?

What struck me about the whole thing was how people seemingly could not fathom how the colors could be seen as anything other than what they personally saw/interpreted. Were some of them exaggerating, do you think?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wetsoggybread 10 points 1 week ago

I never really thought much of it just a 'huh, it looks white ans gold to me' then i realized ive had a blue light filter on my computer and phone for a long time and its heavily skewed into red. Turns out turning that off helped me see it as blue and black. Who knew

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh hey, I just listened to a thing about this!

What we can learn about perception, priors, and truth itself from the party dress that sparked a global debate over the nature of reality

Tap for spoilertl;dl

People who get up early tend to see the dress as white and gold, because their mind is used to resolving ambiguous colors using the context of early morning lighting.

People who stay up late tend to see it as blue and black (the true colors), because their mind is used to resolving ambiguous colors in the context of evening indoor lighting.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes we already know morning people are brain damaged

[–] jpreston2005 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

especially because they view getting up early as some sort of badge of honor, while everyone who dares to follow their own natural circadian rhythm is some lazy good-for-nothing. You're not special for sleeping during a a different time of the day, get over yourself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They really are just sooooo full of themselves, some of them. Not all of course, but especially when you get them in a work environment they act like their way is the only way. Which is especially funny since that damages the learning ability of kids. 9-5 tends to force 730-2, give or take, school schedules, and children are especially susceptible to harm from waking up that early. To this day the earliest I have ever woken up consistently was grade school. And I was always tardy..and even then they would give out like dumb prizes and shit for people who showed up "on time" consistently.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My gripe is that night owls are supposed to be quiet so we don’t disturb the morning larks’ slumber, but larks can be as loud as they want in the morning cuz they gotta wake themselves up, and they got places to be, and also fuck you for being so selfish sleeping in past 7:00.

[–] Epzillon 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stg i saw gold/white on left first, then after looking at the right one for a bit it just switched to the classic blue/black ive always seen. I hate this picture so damm much

[–] toynbee 15 points 1 week ago

I see a black/blue on the right and a dusty black/blue on the left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chekhovs_Gun 8 points 1 week ago

It definitely says yanny

[–] TheRedSpade 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm guessing the dude on the right is a Voss, but what's the one on the left? Just really pale?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

This comment needs a trigger warning

[–] criss_cross 2 points 1 week ago

The one on the right is Thrawn

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wjrii 4 points 1 week ago

The dress on the left has put in amazing service over the years, and even it's getting a bit threadbare it can be a nice part of the right ensemble. The one on the right seems great in drawings and text descriptions, but just sorta hangs there limply once it's actually delivered.

load more comments
view more: next ›