this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
1078 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

6174 readers
3213 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if that’s the question you want answered…

X uses a native browser controller when you open a link, so the app can’t see what you do in there.

Whereas TikTok uses a managed webview… which they have been caught injecting keyloggers into.

Back in the olden days, we called this a cross-site scripting attack.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Seems like meta were trying something similar with thier replacing all links in Facebook messenger with thier fbrpc://facebook/nativethirdparty?app_id Links, but seems like they gave up on it because it was all broken.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. They’re all dangerous monsters.

IMO, it doesn’t even matter who’s worse, cuz they’re all bad enough they should all be subject to aggressive regulation with the goal of establishing safe interop off-ramps for people to stop using the services or at least use more trustworthy clients.

In my estimation, TikTok is worse, but that’s not even what the ban is about. It’s because China is spying instead of the US. That’s not a reason to defend TikTok though, or to oppose the government’s decision — cuz they were accidentally right, for the wrong reason.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

That's where I'm at. If in an alternate universe Congress did something like banning the distribution of harvested data, even just to foreign entities, and TikTok then refused to comply, then I'd be fully in support with them getting banned for it.

Here in the real world though, Congress apparently doesn't have the balls to pass blanket privacy rights like that, because you see, that'd catch some of the wrong fish. I think it says a lot about the state of modern social media that all they were willing to go after TikTok for was something as nebulous as "national security risk".

[–] Pacattack57 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This was never about national security. It’s about money. Most of congress owns Meta stock and meta lobbied the fuck out of trying to get the app banned. It’s extremely annoying that people buy this crap about national security.

Ask yourself when in the history of our country did 85% of congress agree on something? 85% of these fuckwads agreed that banning this app is more important than literally anything else. Stopping school shooting, fixing our economy, providing affordable healthcare or housing, are all not important.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago

It's because money money money, nomnomnom

https://coub.com/view/23wglk

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I suspect its being banned because of people using it in public without headphones or earbuds. I was submitted to that experience for an hour+ in a waiting room one time and now I fully supported the ban to prevent it from ever happening again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago

I wish you were right, but you're not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

Did you tell them to turn off the fucking speaker?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 minutes ago

Have you met people? They are unpredictable. You might get shot just for asking somebody politely to turn off their speaker.

In fact, I was once on a bus where somebody got stabbed because they asked some guy to stop playing music through his boombox (yes, I'm old).

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

Tiktok aren't giving Trump loads of money

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago

That's not relevant to the argument about how they could be dangerous for national security.

[–] Maggoty 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be so sure about that. The CEO has a prominent seat at Trump's inauguration.

[–] leadore 5 points 2 hours ago

Yep. Which means TikTok gave Thumper a load of dough and TikTok will be allowed to continue operating here. Zuck is probably not happy since he'd also given him a load of dough to get rid of TikTok.

pops corn

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

A fatal mistake for companies who want to do business in the US

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gmtom 15 points 4 hours ago (9 children)

Serious answer: because it's owned by a US citizen and is operated and HQ'd in the US, so the the US government has effectively full control over it and can monitor it.

That's not a lot better from an end user privacy and security point. But is wayyyyyyyyyy better from a national security standpoint.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 minutes ago

Same reason China wants it.

[–] Maggoty 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The US government has no more control over X than regulations permit. They have the exact same amount of control over TikTok operations inside the US.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Crazyslinkz 43 points 6 hours ago (14 children)

I find it funny that if TikTok was sold to an American it wouldn't be a security risk anymore.

[–] GreenKnight23 18 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

that was literally the whole fucking point.

is it me or did Lemmy fill up with the most oblivious users all of a sudden?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Is it me or is everyone ELSE a moron except somehow for specifically ME

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DicJacobus 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Reddit must be banning lots of people

[–] BetaBlake 5 points 4 hours ago

They are, it's all bots now

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They are all problematic. My disagreement with the removal of TikTok is that it should not stop with TikTok. Meta's apps are an absolute nightmare. Google, Xitter, Amazon, etc., they all need to be curbed when it comes to data collection.

Data brokering needs to be made illegal or VERY tightly regulated.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 17 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

they all need to be curbed when it comes to data collection.

The problem with TikTok isn't data collection, though. The stated concern of the US government is that TikTok may be used to inflict foreign influence (ie, Woke Mind Virus Communism).

That is, incidentally, why the flood of users to RedNote has been so funny. TikTok's got a bunch of edgy western Zoomers doing "Did You Know Capitalism Is Bad Sometimes?" infographics in between dances. RedNote is just straight up "China Is The Best Country In The World" nature channel style hagiography.

The US pushed millions of Americans out of the frying pan and directly into the fire.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 3 hours ago

Of note, there is no evidence the government concern is founded.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand. Twitter was definitely used for that and Musk was "paying" to have people vote republican in Pennsylvania.

Meta paid like 800 million for the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

So like, if they sold to a US company then they'd get wrist slapped too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Those aren't foreign but also why a lot of those sites are blocked in china

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yes, the ban of TikTok has been more about lip service than actual protections for Americans.

The real solution is passing a comprehensive law that fines/bans any app/platform that is opaque about its influence from governments and its data sharing with governments. But who in Congress today has any appetite for real solutions!

I had written about this to my reps and their response was a non response - TikTok bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 185 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

They are both security risks. The difference is the SA oligarch has already successfully infiltrated our national security and installed himself in a position of power so we can't do anything about it anymore.

Honestly the way he did it was pretty perfect. Create technology and weapons and R&D for the country you want to infiltrate, ingratiate yourself to it's people, government, and military. Then start throwing money into politics to buy yourself a spot on the cabinet.

This is a game any bad state actor with a huge wad of cash can play thanks to Citizen's United.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Create

I think you mean buy. Fund is probably the most generous word you could use, but that’s a fat stretch.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›