this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
398 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19143 readers
3057 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that imply that the federal government needs to do something to prevent similar events in the future? Like actually doing something to reduce CO2 emissions in the US?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would activate the FEMA fund and allow for a pool of executive spending for disaster relief, yes.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh you mean, oh no, big oil and legacy auto are struggling with the switch to EV.. they need relief money so they can destroy the ecosystem and come up with a 0 emission plan by 2050....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, I mean that our dear president and his cabinet get to decide to continue with BP's BS and lose 2024, or prove that he's tackling climate change earnestly and with all due seriousness over the next 5 years.

[–] AllonzeeLV 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"Oh, haha, now that I am personally getting inconvenienced by climate change, I demand the government take action to assist me."

You know, we could have worked to prevent this all together decades ago for everyone when we were told this would happen over and over. Man we're a shitty species. Maybe the heat will teach some of those who need it some much needed humility.

Nah.

[–] CapitalismsRefugee 23 points 1 year ago

More than a century ago in fact;

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I usually don't like this type of stuff, but this made me laugh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=wCo3XwTRg9o

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] CADmonkey 29 points 1 year ago

It's been over 100°F for two or three weeks here. Of course I live in a redhat reichwing state and people are quick to point out "yeah, it's always 104° in July" the problem is its been over 100° every day since June. That's unusual. Or it was unusual.

[–] flossdaily 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This article didn't even mention deadly wet bulb conditions (ie, humidity so high that sweating no longer cools a person down).

We'll be hearing more and more about that as climate change progresses. Talk about a disaster... combine that with a power failure, and you'll start seeing a true catastrophe.

[–] LaunchesKayaks 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was 95F and 98% humidity at my house the other day. I thought I was going to die every time my dogs had to go out to pee.

[–] Hyggyldy 3 points 1 year ago

This prompted me to look up how humidity percentages work. It's the amount of water in the air relative to it's current maximum based on temperature and pressure. Going above 100% is possible above 25000 ft due to the purity of the air. Clouds formed when impurities are introduced or pressure and temperature allow. (This is all just my cursory pleb 'knowledge' and may be partially or entirely wrong)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

How about we compromise and just declare the oil industry itself a federal disaster and nationalize it?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Between fires and floods half the country already is. Add in heat and you will be hard pressed to find an area of the country not in a disaster. How can anyone at this point not see global warming is a thing and has horrible effects.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have it on good authority from the butcher down the road who says climate change is bullshit because he has lived in this town his whole life. Checkmate!

I asked him why we never had temperatures above 40c prior to 1960 and now we have rolling heat waves that are that hot. Apparently they are lies that all scientists say so that climate scientists can get grant money.

[–] FlyingSquid 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should ask him who has more money invested in being right- scientists or fossil fuel companies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

He would have to wait for Joe Rogan to say something about it to have an answer

[–] Mightymaxx 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Goes beyond warming. Wait till Nashville gets buried under a foot of snow and they'll all cry "hur dur where's the global warming!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or that time a fucking senator brought a fucking snowball to the floor to repeat the same bullshit "logic".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=3E0a_60PMR8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Its kind of silly for Nevada, Arizona and Texas to ask for aid. They are basically asking for a yearly donation which is stupid. You guys live in ~100% arid areas... your leadership should be crating infastructure given your needs by taxing higher. The constituents pride themselves on affordable housing and low taxes yet the governement is asking for a yearly bailout.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with neoliberal capitalism is that other people's money runs out.

[–] grue 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Especially when all your policies are devoted to hollowing out the middle class for the benefit of the rich.

It's like the meme with the dog:

image

(Edit: I'm having problems with image embedding: https://imgflip.com/i/7ubf3v)

[–] Ensign_Crab 2 points 1 year ago

Its kind of silly for Nevada, Arizona and Texas to ask for aid. They are basically asking for a yearly donation which is stupid. You guys live in ~100% arid areas…

Houston is not arid. The Rio Grande Valley is not arid. Corpus Christi and Beaumont are not arid. Texas has 367 miles of oppressively humid coastline.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Naw, it's what we do as a nation. Blue states subsidize red states every year because it's the right thing to do. The gov't helps coastal states in the Gulf and East Coast when they get hit by hurricanes every year. The gov't (ie, all of us) support midwest towns when they get hit by tornados, floods, or train derailments, because... we are a country. Less and less these days, but still.

[–] IverCoder 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unusually very hot here in the Philippines too but for several days every two weeks it gets cancelled out by the biweekly typhoon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just a normal year in the Philippines. 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I do lawn care and I've had heat exhaustion/minor heat stroke more times this year than every other year combined. I'm in Canada and I remember when 30 celsius with the humidex was hot. Now it's getting to nearly 40 fairly consistently.

Honestly, with how crap everything is getting and how many times governments have had to give out various relief funds the past few years, why do we not have a universal basic income yet? At least that way they wouldn't have to pass a new law every few months to give out a bit of pocket change that doesn't actually make a difference with how high the cost of living is now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lol that’s the best stock photo they could find?