this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
440 points (98.9% liked)

196

16845 readers
3242 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There is no safety. No matter how wealthy you are, your house can be destroyed. No matter how much you diversify your portfolio, the economy could crash and send you back to square one. No matter what private army you pay, forces beyond your control can crush you like a bug.

Humans do not rule the world, and under capitalism, we don't even rule ourselves. We're ruled by profit motives more than any rich individual. No matter how much Musk or Trump try to play king, they're merely mortals riding the wave of economics and politics. We have no real gods, only chaos; no real masters, only thugs and bullies

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

No matter how wealthy you are, your house can be destroyed.

AND...

(from USA Today)

California had a home insurance crisis before the LA fires. It's only going to get worse.

The impact of the catastrophic wildfires could drive up already sky-high premiums and prompt a new wave of private insurers dropping policies or declining to write new ones – and not just in the LA area.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The wealthy can't hide from the Children of Kali.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But we need to get those egg prices down!

/s

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At the moment, I’m beginning to think that the best we can do is both, it might be to late for an either/or situation

[–] Blum0108 8 points 1 week ago

Though I'm not sure how slow the apocalypse will be.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

You say the whole world's ending, honey, it already did

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Should have paved over those mountains.

Can't have a fire if the landscape is one continuous piece of asphalt.

[–] Kbobabob 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I might be wrong in this. My understanding is that it is flammable, but not when it's "solid" if that makes sense. That a fire would have to be on it and burning hot enough for long enough to start melting the tar then that could burn. But the asphalt itself isn't likely to just catch fire from a lighting strike or something and just continue to burn.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

First it melts, but it's made up of very long hydrocarbons, so... probably?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there is a 3rd way: a short, quick apocalypse. like nuclear war

[–] Brickhead92 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is, but the profits aren't as high as a slow apocalypse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you manage to draw it out a little, maybe a few weeks, and establish really scammy nuclear survival focused companies to meet inevitable desperate demand, then theoretically stock surges could be unprecedentedly high and fast.

At some point before the end the numbers might be so glorious it would be like looking upon the face of God.

[–] Alpha71 15 points 1 week ago

Slow apocalypse it is then!

[–] IzzyScissor 8 points 1 week ago

The thing about cancer is that it will eventually kill itself. It destroys the environment it lives in until it becomes uninhabitable, killing both the host environment and the cancer itself.

So, the cancer is already going to die, it's only a matter of if it takes us with it or not. The ONLY option for survival is to kill it before it kills us. There is no siding with cancer and hoping you won't be affected.

(Capitalism is the cancer, in case mods get nervous)