this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
882 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

10345 readers
917 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

would be funny to have some cyclist war boys in mad max

[–] RegalPotoo 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now I'm imagining these scrawny ass war boys with calves the size of grapefruits from cycling on sand all day

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure there would be one standout dude on a post-apocalyptic penny farthing that spews fire and the big wheel is just a giant saw blade.

[–] MutilationWave 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes please. I just watched Furiosa last night for the first time and I loved it so much. Even if you don't like the story the stunt work is nuts!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

furiosa was awful. And this is probably the reason:

Jackson said that Furiosa "leans much more heavily [than Fury Road] on visual effects" and that Miller "completely embraced the idea that CG is the way to go to build worlds and do whatever we need to do in post".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ew... Does that mean Furiosa doesn't have all the dope ass practical effects like Fury Road? I haven't seen it yet, but this makes me not really want to...

Does saying this in Fuck Cars make me evil? All that gasoline and fire certainly isn't helping things not become like the movie... 🤔

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Mad Max became a cheap imitation of itself :(

like most of the franchises that go on for too long.

[–] MutilationWave 3 points 1 month ago

As I said above, there are a ton of practical effects and real stunts. You can tell the difference if you're watching for it.

[–] MutilationWave 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can clearly tell the difference between the real stunts, of which there are a ton, and the CG stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can clearly tell the difference between the real stunts, of which there are a ton, and the CG stuff.

yes, and that's the problem. We shouldn't be able to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz 50 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Ah Mutually Assured Destruction, if it works for the world’s superpowers it should work for us cyclists.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Should bikes be covered in explosive reactive armor?

Some sources say yes.

[–] HearTwoTalk 15 points 1 month ago

How noncredible of you

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My safety is backed by nuclear weapons.

-Mahatma Gandhi

[–] Xanthrax 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not insinuating anything, but u-locks fit pretty well in the hand, and side mirrors are pretty flimsy.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Please don't start a fight with an aggressive driver. For your sake. They may be in the wrong, they may be breaking the law, they may be assholes, but you could very easily lose your life. Vehicle vs person/cyclist: vehicle will win the physical fight, with 4+ thousand lbs of force. No amount of court-ordered money to your family after you're gone is worth that. Use a camera and report drivers, safely, after the fact.

[–] WoodScientist 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We really need to pass laws that allow individual cyclists to collect bounties on drivers that violate safety laws.

Police are generally pretty ineffective at actually enforcing laws meant to protect cyclists. Most states have laws relating to minimum passing distance, laws that allow cyclist to take the whole lane, etc. But these laws mean little because cops don't really enforce them for cultural and practical reasons. First, cops are extremely classist. They tend to assume cyclists are poor. And thus they really don't see them as fully human, so they don't really care about protecting them. It's common for drivers to not even get a ticket when they murder a cyclist with their vehicle. Second, there are practical difficulties of enforcing these laws. Cops can't realistically just sit at a location, waiting until a driver happens to violate some bicycle safety law. If police were to attempt to enforce safe passing distance laws, they would have to actually get on a bicycle themselves while in plain clothes and just wait until drivers violated their safety. But most cops would take riding a bike as an insult to their manhood, and they are generally pretty fat and lazy. Biking isn't really their cup of tea. For cultural and practical reasons, police are generally very poor at enforcing bicycle safety laws.

I think the solution is to allow individual cyclists to enforce the safety laws themselves. It isn't hard or expensive to equip a bicycle and helmet with a handful of very decent cameras. Are you following the law, occupying the lane, when an angry driver in a giant pickup truck comes up right behind you and starts tailgating you and wailing on their horn? They are likely violating the law. They are violating all sorts of rules about aggressive driving, unsafe following, etc. By doing this, they are putting your life at risk. As such, I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to sue them in court for damages. Pass a cyclist within the 3 foot minimum passing distance? They should be able to take you to small claims court for $200. Aggressive tail gating and honking? $500. "Rolling coal" into a group of cyclists? $1000 per cyclist violated. Deliberately run a cyclist off the road? They now own your car. In many cities, some people could probably make their whole living just biking around and collecting fines from asshole drivers.

Cars have license plates on them. In a court case, it is not hard to find who owns a vehicle. And cyclists can easily equip their helmets and bikes that will clearly record the license plate and face of any aggressive driver that violates safety laws. So you can pretty easily find the specific individual that was threatening your safety.

I really think this is the most effective thing we could do to increase cyclist safety in the US. The unique risks cyclists face from drivers just aren't the kind of violations that traffic cops are effective at dealing with. And enforcing laws like minimum passing distance really aren't something that needs the full services of an armed officer to get involved in. Instead, these rules could be enforced through simple civil action. Let cyclists who have had their safety violated directly sue the drivers who violated their safety. No need to carry a weapon and fight it out on the streets. Instead, let them go before a judge and try to justify their ridiculous behavior to them. If small claims court proves inappropriate for this, we could also up the fines a bit and let cyclists also collect attorneys fees. An attorney could specialize in just this type of case, get really good at winning them, and then take the cases on contingency. They could even put up billboards saying, "make sure to have these types of cameras to most effectively capture evidence..."

If we can have bounties on people for using the 'wrong' bathroom, I see no reason we can't do the same thing for cyclists and ignorant aggressive drivers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Best thing to do right now is to file traffic complaints with the local police.

[–] WoodScientist 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

File one of those, and it goes straight to the trash bin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Knowing that the driver won't get away with it greatly helps in keeping your cool when you encounter an arsehole. It also stops you being an arsehole back because it would weaken your case against them. This only works if the police will do something, but luckily they do here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My lawyer told me I shouldn't smash up cars that are parked in the bike lane.

[–] Duamerthrax 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Unscrew the valve stem cap on a tire. Place a bb in the cap and put the cap back on. Escalation needs to start at the bottom.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is a bb and what would it do?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eheran 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sorry, but almost always nothing would happen.

[–] PugJesus 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes. But not like a massive explosion. Worst case is a fireball. These things are really though for obvious reasons. If the impact is THAT violent you are dead before the gas has time to ignite. The car is not going to care much about a few seconds of additional fire.

[–] Bahnd 8 points 1 month ago

Agree, at the speed where this ploy starts working is around the part where you stop being a human and start being physics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ziglin 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

New approach: we strap a demon core to our bicycles 😁

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Now that's a clean-burning mutually assured destruction I tell you what.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bosnian ape society moment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

That's the spirit!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mutually Assured Destruction works for preventing the use of nukes, surely it can work for cars being more careful of pedestrians and bicyclists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I find interesting about this comment is that despite living in a fairly dense area, I don't hear these complaints from pedestrians. Not that there aren't deaths, to be clear, it's just that with pedestrians I hear "slower speeds", "traffic calming", "better visibility".

From bicyclists I hear "fuck, you want me to put a light on my bike? why don't you put a light on your car motherfucker?" (Actual lemmy thread from 1-2 months ago, paraphrased to represent the actual vitriol involved).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure there are some super elitist joggers that have those same thoughts somewhere. 🤷🏻‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I've heard of a pyrrhic victory but Jesus.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sooo... does anyone know what pannier that guy is rocking? I love that style of "hold anything" sling pannier.

Edit: The closest thing I can find is the Surly Big Dummy Bag

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Found this forum post via google lens: https://www.bicycles.net.au/forums/viewtopic.php?t=66083 the rack in the image looks kinda similar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure the car would absorb the shrapnel far better than your neon spandex though

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, now I kinda want to see a propane powered motor bike.

[–] Cort 5 points 1 month ago

Lmao, or a propane generator on the back of an e bike charging a spare battery

[–] RubberElectrons 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was that a line from Barton Fink?

[–] WoodScientist 5 points 1 month ago

I thought it was a Mad Max reference.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 month ago

I like the idea. I think I'll tie some pressure-activated mines to myself next time I go for a walk in a high-traffic area.

[–] yuki2501 2 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of Raven from Snow Crash, except his bike was carrying a nuke 💀

load more comments
view more: next ›