The legacy of the Roberts court will its spiral into institutionalized corruption. For a man who claims to hold the legitimacy of the court to be paramount, his resistance to any sort of oversight of the court's ethical standards will be how he is remembered. You can't restore faith in institutions by grandstanding against your accusers in a fruitless effort to deflect the valid criticisms of your colleagues.
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
186 points (97.4% liked)
News
23736 readers
4498 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Roberts also cited disinformation, exacerbated by social media and in some cases hostile foreign governments, as a problem, as it can "undermine confidence in the court system."
No John, the erosion of confidence is your own courts doing. You refuse to hold yourself to ethical standards every other branch of government does.
You refuse to hold yourself to ethical standards every other branch of government does.
Which branch is that?
Legislative branch uses their power to increase their wealth. Probably why they won't pass a bill banning stocks.
Executive branch, well I guess we'll see how far down the ethical road that goes, again...
Shame to hear about another suicidal oligarch.
This is one of the most disturbing and discouraging things about our current era.
Clearly, the solution to the problem of people distrusting institutions because the officials in them are corrupt is to eliminate the corruption.
But this is far from the first time recently that I've seen an official express the idea that the problem is not that they in fact are corrupt, but that people point out their corruption - as if we're supposed to merely accept their corruption and grant them respect anyway, and somehow we're to blame for the problem because we won't do that.
It's astonishingly amoral. They're not merely, as is all too common amongst the ruling class, acting as if they're above the law, but overtly stating that they are, and faulting us for daring to treat them otherwise.
SCOTUS is utterly corrupt and illegitimate.
EXACTLY.
I hope that guy steps on a lego
Every day for the rest of his miserable life.
Other people have already put it better, so I'm going to put it plainly.
suggesting political bias in the judge's adverse rulings without a credible basis
Fuck. You. We know how disingenuous this is, and fuck you.
Let us all pray to Saint Luigi
Praise be.
Fuck you John Roberts, you fucking fascist fuck.
"How dare you make all of these criticisms about us, questioning our impartiality and suggesting we're corrupt! Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to get on Justice Thomas' free luxury RV and drive down to Harlan Crow's mansion for a much-needed vacation."
On my way to collect my after-ruling-gratuity from the person who I ruled in favor of which is definitely not a bribe and is totally legal.
Defiance of rulings from this corporate owned court is an act of patriotism.
So we need more political calls to ignore court decisions, to degrade judicial authority from an illegitimate and corrupt institution.
John Roberts is scared of his power being questioned and has been for a long time. The conservative "judicial" movement has put a lot of effort into acquiring the power to rule as politicians in black robes and doesn't want anyone to take that away. That fear occasionally comes out in him giving token but ineffectual resistance to the bad decisions of his conservative teammates, but more often comes out as him criticizing anyone that would dare question why they should be listened to. Never does it involve actual efforts to bolster the court's legitimacy and curb its blatant corruption.
Roberts' SCOTUS will go down in history as the tipping point for America's undoing
Dude is confusing attacks on his legitimacy with Illegitimate attacks.
I have no respect for five of them anymore and wish I had superpowers to fix what they have done.
We don't need someone with superpowers. We just need a man of focus, commitment, and sheer will. Luigi, help us!
And elect him president so it's legal.
Well America has proven it's okay electing a convicted felon, so yeah, I say we get the Mangione 2028 train rolling. Or whenever he's old enough to be eligible to take office
35, so 8 years
I don't even know why we listen to them. They reversed a previous decesion by the supreme court when the overturned Roe. So what they are saying is SCOTUS can be wrong. Why do they even exist then.
the senate is legitimate, guess he forgot that from his expertise in constitutional law
This stupid fuck thinks it's everyone else's fault. Judges shouldn't be able to escape this mess. You guys have your hands all over this mess. It's your fault!
Might be a symptom of a lifetime appointment with ultimate power in deciding how the lower classes live. He hasn't had to consider if he's wrong because there's no consequences if he is.
Since they have given the president the power to do anything if it is an official act I guess they will taste the bite of that decision soon.
Funny way to phrase that, Johnny.
