this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
67 points (83.8% liked)

politics

19271 readers
1855 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 100 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

And if you are scoffing, “Well, that will never happen …” Congratulations. You can add an attempted coup, and the worst attack on our Capitol in more than 200 years to the list of horrible things you have helped normalize the past eight years.

Get fucked, D. Earl Stephens. Biden normalized it by appointing this Grand Fuckhead. I never voted for Merrick fucking Garland so you can stop blaming me and other voters for "normalizing" anything when all we're doing is noticing patterns and responding to them accordingly. We've had thirty fucking years of the national Democratic party normalizing getting absolutely reamed by the Republicans and mostly just bending over and taking it, so seriously stuff it. We didn't normalize it, the lawmakers, judges, and executives normalized it, we're just taking notice and aren'tquiet about it.

We are not a serious country if we are willing to casually sweep a violent attack on our Democracy witnessed by hundreds of millions of people around the world under the rug like this.

He's right, we're not a serious country. Prior to this, we had Salt Typhoon where Chinese hackers infiltrated all the communications government backdoors that our communications companies have made for law enforcement. Despite the literal actually happening evidence that backdoors are a bad idea, the FBI still wants backdoors into our chats. He can stop kidding himself about it, we're currently the least serious country on the planet, especially in regards to National Security. Trump selling secrets is honestly the least of our concerns.

It’s not the justice system most of us want or deserve, but it’s the only one we have, and for once, they owe us the damn truth.

Uhm, they always owed us the damn truth Jesus Christ.

[–] FuglyDuck 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I feel like D. Earl Stephens just realized how fucked we are.

that first quote of yours pretty much encapsulates his.... remarkable lack of PAYING THE FUCK ATTENTION.

People have been raising the alarm. People have been begging, praying, demanding that Trump face consequences. Garland, Biden. most the centrist DNC's that are too scared of appearing sane. They're all complicit, not because of their actions, but their inaction. Yes, there were challenges. yes. Cannon deserves a special place in hell. Yes, Trump has the SCROTUS on his side.

edit:

And lets be increasingly clear about who the fuck normalized this trumpian shit-dip we've found ourselves in. journalists. Especially mainstream journalists. who refused to express just how fucked up the lot of this is was, sane washed his every tweet; and refused to give equal airtime to their political opponents; or held dems to task for the most quibbling little detail they could find.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

journalists. Especially mainstream journalists

Not so much the journalists, but the editors. Journalist can write an article with every scathing detail left in and it won't get published if the editor says 'tone down your language'.

[–] FuglyDuck 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and they tone down the language. or they never have it in to begin with.

but you can not-sane-wash and still keep it fairly "journalistic". you just have to be honest. How many news anchors saw what was happening live, were shocked and horrified and the next week it wen from 'riots' and 'insurrection' to "protest"?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah. Their choice is to either give in to the editor's/owners demand that the language change or they don't have a job anymore. I'm not saying the phenomenon you describe isn't real. Just hold the appropriate people responsible and it is the editors setting the agenda, not the journalists 99% of the time.

[–] FuglyDuck 0 points 3 days ago

… And if you are scoffing, “Well, that will never happen …” Congratulations. You can add an attempted coup, and the worst attack on our Capitol in more than 200 years to the list of horrible things you have helped normalize the past eight years. …

Sorry. He compromised as a journalist and helped normalize the shitheal. He’s part of the reason why people laughed and refused to believe that Trump was spouting Nazis rhetoric practically cloned from the Nuremberg address in 2016.

And this asshole in particular thinks it’s my fault?

I’ve been calling trump out for being a Nazis- and journalists and editors collectively ignored the signs that were sitting right there in front of everyone.

You’re right. He could have lost his job.

Booohooo. Millions of Americans have died as a direct result of trump’s presidency. A president journalists everywhere helped normalize.

You don’t get to pass that buck.

[–] JeeBaiChow 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but gaza!

/s because people can't tell

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Yep, same with all the other surveillance stuff they passed over the years. Now they're being all panicky about Trump having access to this entire surveillance apparatus, and all we can say is: we told you motherfuckers this would happen, and you voted for it anyway.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Get fucked, D. Earl Stephens

Yeah, never trust anyone whose name starts with an initial! Except for H. Jon Benjamin, of course.

You're spot on about the rest too, btw ✊

[–] Ensign_Crab 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Except for H. Jon Benjamin, of course.

I'll remind you that he did a series of commercials for Arby's.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I can forgive that because he's put his money where his mouth is for a lot of progressive politics. You can find him in lots of places where right-wing shitfuckery is being deconstructed, like when he played Saddam Hussein on the BLOWBACK podcast about the horrors of the Iraq war and how it came to be. Or when he backed Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All bill and explained it in a series of YouTube videos.

Everyone needs a paycheck, and getting paid doesn't invalidate the other work they do.

(Also H. Jon Benjamin and Sam Seder go way back to the Home Movies days.)

[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Merrick Garland accomplishing anything in a WEEK? Yeah, that's as likely as my cats becoming alternating empresses of Greater Lithuania..

[–] alaphic 18 points 3 days ago

I, for one, welcome our new feline overlords

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What good would this accomplish now? I’m genuinely curious? I didn’t finish the article because it seemed pointless halfway through, so maybe the author said a reason that I missed.

We’re fucked. I have no hope. I plan to disengage as much as possible for the sake of my mental health. If I don’t, horrible depression is assured.

[–] just_another_person 9 points 3 days ago

I mean...that's a valid response and feeling for sure, but I don't think you'll be able to hide from the horrible shit coming at all of us. People need to stay informed and find ways to resist it.

[–] WaxiestSteam69 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm in the same boat. I'm about 10 years away from retirement and I don't think any of us GenXers will make it.

[–] Chocrates 3 points 1 day ago

I'm a millennial. I have no equity and it seems assured that I won't have Social Security. I might still get drinking water, I'm scared about that for the zoomers.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So is this the evidence or the evidence announcement for the announcement of the evidence?

[–] ytorf 18 points 3 days ago

No this is the suggestion that an announcement of evidence of an evidence announcement would get some clicks for the doofus making the suggestion

[–] JeeBaiChow 6 points 3 days ago

Maybe its the concept of an announcement

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Merrick fucking Garland?

[–] jordanlund 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The best we can hope for is all the evidence is archived where Trump can't get at it and we re-visit it in 2029. 2027 if we're super lucky and the Democrats regain the House and Senate.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As if the Democrats would do a damn thing. They had four fucking years to put nails in Trump's coffin and couldn't do anything for fear of their corporate masters being denied the same grifts.

[–] jordanlund 4 points 3 days ago

They couldn't do anything because they were trusting the legal system under Merrick Garland.

Of course if they had gone with my personal preference, round up all the Trumpies and Trumpublicans under the RICO act and let them all rot, we would have had larger problems.

There needs to be some kind of middle ground which we haven't found yet.

[–] Ensign_Crab 8 points 3 days ago

The best we could hope for was a DOJ that wasn't shit on purpose.