this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
266 points (96.8% liked)

News

25512 readers
4157 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump submitted a Supreme Court filing opposing a TikTok ban, citing his “dealmaking expertise” and promising to resolve national security concerns.

The brief advocates delaying the case to allow Trump to address it politically.

Legal experts criticized the filing for being overly self-promotional and unprecedented, with some mistaking it for satire.

Critics noted its unusual tone and highlighted the involvement of Trump’s potential solicitor general pick, D. John Sauer, in drafting the document.

The case concerns TikTok’s alleged violations of privacy laws and ties to China.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

promising to resolve national security concerns

The guy with boxes of TS documents in his bathroom suddenly cares about national security? I don't think so.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why not? He was personally seeing to their security.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

That doesn’t sound right, but as an American, I don’t have the wherewithal to find fault with your premise.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We’ll see how idiotic and servile the Supreme Court will be under Trump. Good to know early on.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah the outcome of this will be telling. From a legal standpoint it should be clear - Congress has passed a law and the president has signed it into law.

Trumps plans and intentions are irrelevant - he should need congress to pass a new law to undo this one. It'd be bizarre for the Supreme Court to undermine the law based on a whim of the president elect.

But if the Supreme Court do go along with trumps whims then we'll have a very clear idea how bad things have already gotten. However it's clear things are already pretty fucking bad as the US constitution and infrastructure failed to stop an insurrectionist getting power.

[–] FuglyDuck 7 points 2 months ago

But if the Supreme Court do go along with trumps whims then we’ll have a very clear idea how bad things have already gotten. However it’s clear things are already pretty fucking bad as the US constitution and infrastructure failed to stop an insurrectionist getting power.

part of me is wondering if this isn't a sounding board by trump to see if they'll toe the line. (They'll toe the line because they're cucks who like to watch.)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

“You see, I made a deal with them… and I don’t get paid if they get banned”

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everyone needs to stop thinking Trump is some master of satire, or that he is gasp unprecedented. Yeah, we fucking know, pay attention! He’s been beyond the pale and indistinguishable from a sketch comedy dropout for decades now. These “legal experts” need to either learn a goddamn lesson for once, or just shut the fuck up about him, you’re not helping by being too unimaginative to recognize reality.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

I wish he was unpresidented

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nick Kroll was right. Trump is super entertaining. So give him a talk show, not control of a country.

[–] Tyfud 5 points 2 months ago

man, I cannot stand listening to that asshat talk. It's just word gibberish and always about himself.

But if he renounced his presidency and started a morning talkshow? I'd probably watch it. Just for the schadenfreude.

[–] Snapz 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This was always the tactic. gop attacked tiktok, which is extremely popular, if trump lost they'd insist on the "ban" and try to hang the unpopularity of the move that they demanded on Biden. If trump won, they'd chicken shit away from the move, claim trump "saved" something to try to grab opportunistic popularity moment as fuel for the next ghoulish move they need to make publicly that will lose them goodwill.

America is decidedly fucked. The general public isn't equipped to see below the surface layer of this shit.

[–] boogiebored 3 points 2 months ago

“two santas” strategy.

[–] GoofSchmoofer 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

trump meets with CEO of TickTok

I'm sure the conversation was legit and above board and this filing had nothing to do with the visit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

There's definitely not going to be a massive donation to his inauguration fund.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like we used to refer to future executives as “President-elect” in the period before they took office. But then I’m an American, what the fuck do I know?

[–] CybertoothTiger 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it because he's already been president so he still gets the title? I also have genuinely no idea.

[–] SPRUNT 7 points 2 months ago

Yes, former presidents retain the title. Obama is still respectfully addressed as "President Obama" by non-racists.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First h1b. Now pro China social media? Surely his base won't notice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

doesn't matter to him anymore. either he gets his way and elections will be rigged, or he won't be have another term

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It started a very long time ago. What hasn't started yet is enough people figuring that out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

This is America. We don’t do that here.

[–] Duamerthrax 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So ByteDance sent some inauguration money his way.

[–] aesthelete 2 points 2 months ago

I alone can tik this tok...or tok this tik...or whatever.

load more comments
view more: next ›