this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
746 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27222 readers
4708 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 165 points 1 week ago

^yes^ but ~pages~ will ^render^ kinda ~wavy~ i ^use^ a ~box~ fan ^myself^ for ~maximum~ speed

[–] [email protected] 144 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, but then it's slower for your computer to talk back to your Wi-Fi, so it ends up cancelling out

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Lag 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We can streamline this by making the room into 2 small tunnels from the router to the PC. This way there will be less obstacles in the room. But we need to add leafblowers on each side with a boost button.

[–] Opisek 12 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What if we make the tubes really really small and wrap them in many protective layers to prevent other wind sources from messing with the signal.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] affiliate 6 points 1 week ago

you could also hook into the router and wireless card of the computer to make each of them turn on the corresponding leaf blower whenever they’re sending something. of course you’d probably have to implement some kind of queuing system so only one blower is active at a time, but it will all be worth it for the speed gains

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DogWater 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interestingly, this could be true and you could never find out experimentally iirc.

I watched a veritasium video about the 1 way speed of light vs 2 way that talked about it.

[–] antimongo 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I watched the same video!

I was right about to disagree and type “wait this only applies to light” but then I remembered: radio is light.

Crazy to think about that!

[–] DogWater 8 points 1 week ago

It is nuts. It goes to show how far science goes proving things through deductions rather than direct observation. So much science is done that way.

I think that there would be some infinite energy glitches if it was actually true that light was faster 1 direction than another, so I think the assumption is a good one. But still fun facts

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

LOL! Yes, one has to consider this. ZOMG your's is the best comment!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon 63 points 1 week ago (11 children)

There are some stupid questions.

[–] darthelmet 89 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Tbf, it’s not like physics stuff is always obvious, especially when dealing with relativity or quantum mechanics. It just feels obvious if you’ve already learned about the research that’s already been done.

It isn’t even remotely intuitive that light should have a max speed that can’t be added to by moving its source relative to other things. Plus, light does interact with matter, but it can only be slowed down by it.

So less a stupid question and more just one that isn’t educated about something.

[–] carl_dungeon 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yeah yeah, I know. I was mostly just kidding. Everything is magic if you’re ignorant and we shouldn’t shit on people for not knowing something and props to them for asking and seeking knowledge and all that.

But it’s really sad that very basic science like radio waves which are introduced in 5th or 6th grade could be so completely misunderstood.

I remember my 6th grade science class having a lively 15 minute discussion about whether or not rockets can work in space since there’s no air…. We’re looking at videos of rockets working in space and then debating whether or not they do. 🙄

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

On the contrary, given the premise its a smart observation from an unknownledged person.

“Wifi is waves in the air” is very very wrong but as it appears it’s what this person was thought to believe. Given that they trust this information the conclusion makes perfect sense.

The only “dumb” here is whoever explain wifi like this to them.

So what the post really amounts to is. “I applied actual reasoning to the information i was provided as fact and my conclusion seemed strange, so i will ask on no stupid questions to figure out whats really going on”

More intelligent than the majority of internet users.

[–] Dabundis 9 points 1 week ago

"I don't know, can anyone help me learn?" gets so much respect from me. Incredibly powerful mindset.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is not stupid at all. If Wi-Fi used matter instead of magnetic fields to propagate (like sound waves), a fan would affect it. Understanding magnetic fields is anything but intuitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it evens out since now your messages going back to the router have to swim upstream.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could this be remedied by sending packets on a second antenna, with a fan blowing in the opposite direction?

[–] GhostlyPixel 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only if the two air streams don’t intersect, otherwise you’ll create a dead zone. Modern signal jammers are actually highly sophisticated fans.

[–] Holyginz 7 points 1 week ago

You must never cross the streams

[–] Narauko 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, but the tailwind becomes a headwind on the way back to the router so you won't see any actual speed changes. Putting a fan on both ends will cancel each other out too.

You need to change all the gaseous air out for either liquid or a solid as waves propagate faster through them. You should start with filling your house with liquid oxygen as a nice half step so you still have something to breathe easily, as solids are a bit more tricky.

[–] svenkw 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The general idea is correct, but since we're dealing with electronagnetic waves, they travel slower in any medium. So pumping out all the air of the room would technically make your wifi faster.

Liquid oxygen has (I think) a refractive index of about 1.2, so it would make the signals 20% slower (still very fast)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooty 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No, the fan will blow the packets all over the place, which is fine for UDP, but any TCP/IP connection will suffer. Place the fan in front of the router so that the blades will catch any dropped packets and throw them back into the datastream.

[–] tetris11 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

uh, hi. If you place the blades in front of the router, it will start chopping the packets before they even reach. You need to use an bladeless fan

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Not inherently stupid question; they just don't know that radio waves don't travel through air but through space.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

But air is empty space?! /s

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] roguetrick 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depends on the direction the fan is facing. If it's blowing towards you, that increases air pressure in front of it, which means more things for photons to interact with and a lower speed of light, thus slower wifi. Away from you would decrease the pressure and result in faster wifi due to the increased speed of light. Theoretically at least. I don't think this effect is measurable.

Edit: thinking about it, the electromagnetic noise from a fan motor would likely be worse than the benefit. You might even be able to detect that

[–] cmhe 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, but only in one direction and if you use UDP instead of TCP. Also your MTU needs to be small enough for the packages to fit between the blades of the fan, otherwise that causes package fragmentation.

/s

[–] BenLeMan 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sort of a serious answer because I'm bored: You're thinking of speeding up the air when what you should be thinking about is speeding up the waves. But then your waves are reaching you plenty fast already with latency being in the single digit ms range. Not much of a point in trying to accelerate that, really. You won't notice anyway.

If you feel like your internet connection via Wi-Fi is slow then the bottleneck is probably not with the Wi-Fi part of your network but the Internet Access Point behind it. Or even further down the line.

Now this is based on the assumption that you are in a fairly typical network environment, i.e. using semi-current hardware with moderate, if any, electromagnetic interference in the area. If you're living right next to a high voltage transformer station and using a router from 2008 then, yes, you're going to have Wi-Fi performance issues.

But in most cases, people complaining about "slow Wi-Fi" are actually suffering from Internet connectivity issues.

Think of it this way: If you enjoy your McDonald's from the local franchise but you can only get 100 burgers per hour from them (of course you need MOAR!) then upgrading your 320hp Camaro to a 400hp Mustang is not going to enable you to pick up appreciably more burgers from the drive through in the same amount of time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not entirely true.
In an apartment in the middle of a city, noisy neighbours can be a problem.

In those cases, it's best to jump to 5 GHz, and leave the 2.4 band alone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you had a fan blowing out the window, it could slightly reduce the density of the air in your house, leading to a tiny increase in the speed of light through it, so that would make the waves technically faster, but by a vanishingly small margin

It wouldn't increase the bitrate of your router at all, so it wouldn't make a difference, but the waves would be faster

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zoldyck 12 points 1 week ago

I like this question tbh

[–] finitebanjo 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Wifi isn't waves made of air, the wifi is waves of the electromagnetic spectrum, similar to visible light, and they travel faster than you can perceive.

So no.

But you can do something similar with a microwave oven. It's just that any signal making it through the radiation of the oven would be disfigured and useless.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Yes but you have to put a slit in front of it so the wifi waves turn into wifi particles.

[–] eager_eagle 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

and you can speedup your upload by switching the fan direction

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LordWiggle 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's not 1 way traffic. Signals go both ways. To increase your wifi speeds, have 1 fan blow from your router to your device and 1 fan from your device blow towards your router. Signals go faster in warm air so make sure to pump up the thermostat. It also goes faster with less CO2 in the air so make sure to open all windows (unless you own a Mac). Lower moisture in the air also improves speeds, so crank your AC on max. Also placing both your router and device in rice helps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gotta get me one of those oscillating routers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Not gonna lie, I thought about that, but I didn't wanna risk sounding stupid, so I just google it instead of posting it on a forum. Luckily I didn't actually make a forum post.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was an adjunct instructor at a local technical college teaching computer hardware courses. One student asked me if a hard drive that was full weighed more than a hard drive that was empty.

[–] folekaule 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] NorthWestWind 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you can create a vacuum with said fan, it can be faster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zachariah 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

WiFi is waves in space, not air.

[–] _stranger_ 10 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Followup: Can I get a fan that moves space instead of air? I need to make my wifi faster.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

This might sound stupid, but that's because it is.

load more comments
view more: next ›