this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
544 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19232 readers
3913 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Progressives criticized House Democrats for choosing Rep. Gerry Connolly over Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the top Democratic seat on the House Oversight Committee.

The 131-84 vote, reportedly influenced by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, sparked backlash against the party’s “gerontocracy,” with critics like MSNBC’s Joy Reid and others arguing it prioritizes seniority over fresh ideas.

Connolly defended the decision, citing his experience, but progressives argued it reflects the Democratic Party’s resistance to change, hindering its ability to address future challenges and energize younger voters.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My current opinion is not that schisming from the DNC would be a winning move, but if we do it should definitely happen now rather than later.

[–] kreskin 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If the progressives all leave the dems are screwed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 56 minutes ago

I don't see how that addresses the point.

[–] postmateDumbass 4 points 4 hours ago

If they dont, then everyone keeps getting screwed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago

Split, fight, go to war, destroy half of the shitty parts of our party and come back as a unionist party of the fucking people and I might not consider a blue tie a fucking joke the next time I see one.

Clean house, and by clean house, fire yourselves outside of the firebrands and let them take us up to 11.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

Pelosi stole that seat

[–] demizerone 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The ol battle axe was in hospital recovering from hip replacement surgery, but Pelosi still has the heart of a true leader, and managed to get a "young 74 year old" the seat. Way to go Democrats! You fucking idiots are why we have trump part deux.

[–] buddascrayon 8 points 18 hours ago

It's been far less reported but they did almost the exact same thing to Katie Porter in California. She was another rising star that got snuffed out by the DNC machine. They redistrict her seat and then they locked her out of the Senate election and pushed one of their elites in her place.

It was almost an exact repeat of what happened to Nina Turner in Ohio in 2021. Everywhere they can the Democrats lock out progressives. The Democratic party does not give one single shit. All they care about is the money and power they get as politicians. Everything they say is lip service.

[–] lepinkainen 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And the dude has fucking throat cancer

[–] bitjunkie 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure when he croaks in a couple months, AOC will get the seat as she was the runner-up, right?

[–] lepinkainen 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

They’ll have a 73 year old queued up

[–] BilboBargains 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Old white men gonna old white men.

[–] phoneymouse 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] voldage 8 points 19 hours ago

I believe at this point she's a honorary white old man

[–] Marleyinoc 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Democrats don't deserve anymore support. We've got to get a party for the working class. It's just corporate whores in the GOP and DNC.

[–] WarlordSdocy 4 points 1 day ago

If you're interested in that you can always check out the DSA and see if they have a local chapter in your area. They're not a political party right now but imo if anything is gonna form a true labor third party in the US it will most likely come from there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The problem with a winner-take-all system like the Electoral College is that if you do not vote for the Democratic Party, you're just underpinning the Republican Party. The unfortunate truth is that every progressive who sat out the November election for various reasons helped put Trump back in the WH. The Electoral College has to go for a third party to be viable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or you punish the party by removing its political support, until it properly represents your interests and if it is reluctant to do so, you keep organizing for a third party until it takes over.

The claim that the people not voting Dems helped Trump has to be put equally towards everyone that kept voting them no matter what, until they alienated so many people that a candidate like Trump could win. And Trump didnt win once. Hew won twice. The Dems chose to give Trump the victory over reforming themselves to address working class issues. And with all the talk about he would be the end to Democracy they made a point of showing that donors get their way, not normal voters. So their priorities have been made clear.

You can only keep drinking so much, until the hangover comes. But the longer you delay it, the harder it will hit

[–] Maggoty 5 points 1 day ago

That's true right up until it isn't. Just ask the Whigs.

[–] WarlordSdocy 4 points 1 day ago

Sure on the national level that's true, but on the local level third parties can definitely make big gains in areas that are safe democrat seats traditionally. Then from there you fight to implement those kinds of systems at the local level and work up from there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Did anyone think she would actually get it? I don't think AOC herself thought she would. She even went on the View and called Pelosi "mama bear" 🤮

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nandeEbisu 24 points 1 day ago

I'm not actually that surprised a vote by a bunch of politicians was decided based on politics and not which candidate was a better fit.

[–] givesomefucks 152 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

It's not just that he's 74...

It's not just that he got diagnosed with terminal throat cancer, and told voters the day after the recent election.

It's that it hasn't been two years since he last violated (the already barely existent) rules against Congress doing a little insider trading.

https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/gerry-connolly-stocks/

Like, did anyone think when Pelosi was weighing in on the oversight committee, that the person she was backing wasnt corrupt and would actually hold anyone from either party accountable?

Pelosi didn't care just because she hates everyone under retirement age. It's because she needed to know the person in charge of the oversight committee had no reason to hold anyone accountable.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] givesomefucks 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's what I mean, she's corrupt as fuck.

Everyone got hung up on Pelosi just "disliking" AOC, but this would have allowed AOC to investigate Pelosi and other corrupt Dems.

So Pelosi made sure a corrupt Dem got it. That way the status quo is maintained: Dems only go after R, and R only goes after Dems. But neither ever make anything stick.

AOC would try to go after everyone corrupt, and the Republicans would go with it if the target was a Dem.

We'd weed out corruption from the Dem party which would increase turnout, and likely retain the seats.

But it would be bad for Pelosi, and she'll always put herself over party or country

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

That would have been awesome. Purge the Dems of the liberals for a left takeover.

A boy can dream.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Allonzee 99 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

The DNC is a right wing corpo puppet masquerading as opposition.

They're far more comfortable with a fascist as President than they would a leftist like AOC.

Stare at what their priorities are a month before Trump takes office, sabotaging their most leftwing members. Commuting the sentences of profiteer judges. Herp derp gotta keep moving right after all! (just an aside, I love the neoliberals defending Biden's corrupt pardons as "just senile/incompetent")

Reminder: the only leftist congresspeople are spoiler candidates. The DNC promotes solely on the basis of how well you prove you can be bought by large money donors, which tells you all you need to know about who's side they're on. The same side as the Fascists on economic policy, as they get the same checks from the same oligarchs.

I've voted blue for 20 years, with my nose held hoping for harm reduction. I phonebanked for Sanders in 2 campaigns. I already know it's all a sham. You can vote whoever you want as long as they're pro corpo capitalism. But in the 2028 primary, when I see the DNC yet again doing everything they can to kneecap a progressive to install a neoliberal, I'm walking away, as it's just another system of control. The illusion of choice.

If the people won't overcome their "free market" propaganda and vote against the shape and priorities of this sociopath owned economy literally legally conning and murdering us for tidy profits, we can't be saved, and there's nothing worth saving left.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Marleyinoc 28 points 1 day ago

Yeah fuck the Democrats. I'm not giving the DNC or any mainstream PACs any more money. It'll all go through AOC and Bernie from here on out. (Not that my meager contributions mean much to the DNC Corporate whores.)

[–] NatakuNox 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The progress wing should leave the party. Force the dems to come crawling or show their hands as sleeper Republicans

[–] alloloto 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

The frustration is real. There's a movement to create an American Labor Party. I think if it gets enough steam we might see some real change.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 45 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

it’s fine I’ve got experience

A fat lot of good your fucking “experience” has done us lately, wouldn’t you say, Connolly, you ossified, cancer-ridden, insider-trading, neoliberal establishment fuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheLowestStone 24 points 1 day ago

I'll believe they are "up in arms" as soon as they actually do anything.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe use those arms for more than just finger-wagging.

[–] thermal_shock 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago

How can she slap?!

[–] kinsnik 43 points 1 day ago (4 children)

why are the fucking boomers so resistant of letting go of power? pelosi is 84 years old, she belongs in a nursing house, not politics

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

A lot of these people are so old they aren't even boomers... Lol. The oldest boomers are still in their late 70s.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AmazingAwesomator 39 points 1 day ago

rich old white guy: i have an idea - lets have a rich old white guy do it instead

[all vote yea]

:/

load more comments
view more: next ›