this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
702 points (91.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27134 readers
3552 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Had to put on pants to go outside due to artificially created laws.

[–] meliaesc 3 points 51 minutes ago

Facts 😒

[–] pyre 32 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't care if you hate him; he's right on this. this entire thing is bullshit.

[–] ViolentPacifist 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641 21 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

A lot of people think he's become a bit of a wanker on social media and IRL. Some of his tweets are cringe and makes him doing like he's lightyears up his own ass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago

Sometimes I think he forgets he's there to be the science guy and makes it about himself a lot, but when he gets on a science rant that's when hea good, just going on about his love of science and why it's cool as fuck.

Getting James Cameron to fix the stars in the Titanic remake boosted his ego a little bit, but I get that, I'd be a bit ego filled if I was able to make James Cameron change something in his film.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I was one of them until I realized that in grand scheme of things, he is net positive. So I don’t care if he is cringe, I learn quite a bit from him and I wish more influential people were smart like him.

[–] Agent641 4 points 1 hour ago

Fair enough. Maybe I just miss Carl too much

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

I don't use twitter (never have tbh) so I've only ever seen screenshots of his more infamous tweets, but I have listened to a LOT of his startalk podcast. Most of the time he's an entertaining person and seems to admit when he doesn't know enough about a given subject (although I've seen a lot of criticism that he does tend to talk about things he doesn't know, it doesn't seem to be that way in the podcast at least)

He can be annoying in some of his podcasts though and you can feel his guests being diplomatic about it while still hearing a bit of annoyance in their voice or next sentence etc. But overall I rather quite like him, despite the Internet's disdain for him.

More people making science popular and easily digestible is always a good thing IMO. But I'm also biased because I've really liked NDT since I was a kid due to seeing him in space documentaries when I was young, and I still love his version of Cosmos.

[–] halowpeano 28 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think it actually is interesting if you're going to call out humans as a species of animal!

All across species from unicellular to megafauna, from plants to fungus, you can find mechanisms used to defend an individual's physical territory. Ants and bees from the same species will fight and kill others colony members of they stray into their territory. Bears will fight and kill other bears. Our closest relatives, chimps, will go to war with neighboring chimp bands.

Artificial borders are humans way of saying "this is my territory enter at your own risk". The REALLY interesting thing is that we have established systematic exceptions to the behaviors we see in nature. "Ask us before you come and you can visit and be safe here from those that enforce our territory."

The temporary nature is unique, many social animals will permanently adopt an outsider into their group on occasion, equivalent to immigration, but I'm not aware of any that have pre-agreed temporary violations of group territory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago

okay I don't know how to articulate this properly but i'll try;

fukn get rekt ngt

[–] Allonzee 36 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I love all the posts calling him arrogant and elitist for pointing out something, in a critical manner, that by their nature are arrogant and elitist: nation state borders.

Those things that make people who've done nothing feel entitled to more resources than other people by virtue of where their mother was hanging out when she popped them out.

I think dwelling on their artifical, self-serving nature is healthier than taking them seriously in any other sense than the threat of state violence for failing to pretend that they're sacred.

Humanity, not to be confused with your own individual greed or birth lottery results, would be far better off abolishing them. They bring nothing to the table but dehumanization, death, and inequity. Most, even most who consider themselves to be on the privileged side of the imaginary line in the dirt, have far more in common with the people trying to get to the privileged side than the miniscule populations of sociopath humans that use them to secure and metastasize their ego score hoards, the entire point of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes and no.

Borders may not mean a lot when you just pop out of your mother.

But when you have worked 30-50 years building a place in a certain way you may actually have some legit entitlement on all that you built and worked for.

It's a complex issue. We've seem some countries have bad issues because bad inmigration politics.

I know it's against the dogma to even dare to talk about inmigration policies with anything that's not "open borders". It's a sin and the inquisition will promptly come after me for just mentioning that massive inmigration did not improve one particular country. And that a too "welcoming" policy was a proved failure.

But reality beats any kind of dogma, propaganda or illusion. And as rational thinking human beings, when the dogma fails we are required to actually notice it and act accordingly.

[–] Allonzee 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (9 children)

How do the people living in squalor benefit despite working usually even harder with less protections than that worker who worked 30-50 years having their building being protected from those people's opportunity to do the same? What's wrong with that worker's 30-50 years of building yielding a little less so that none of them toil 30-50 years for basically nothing? The one born on side A isn't more deserving on the basis of being birthed on side A, that's nonsensical.

You seem to be looking at this from a tiny nation state citizen concerned about threats from "the other" viewpoint rather than a holistic, humanistic viewpoint.

Self-serving self-interest doesn't impress me. In most cases, such notions should be socially condemned. It's the reason humanity is on the brink of destroying our habitat and are currently killing one another all over.

The most destructive notion humanity was ever inspired to have was "ok... But what's in it for me?" Only cruelty, greed, and gluttony has ever come from such lines of thought.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] victorz 16 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I think about this a few times a year and I become sad each time. We only get this one planet in the whole ass universe. And we can barely see all of it, unless we're lucky and/or rich (at least moreso than most of humankind).

It's profoundly ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I was flying to south East Asia, looking at the digital map of the plane. From above, you can kinda see the country lines.

What made me feel that incredible sadness is that within a 1000 mile radius, a child born might live in a world where they struggle with starvation and have worms in their stomach, or wake up each day with anime and toys. Some countries have so much wealth and resources. Where others barely have anything. I think about all of that as I fly to my vacation destination, having been incredibly lucky to have been born in a pretty wealthy country.

One could argue that you can be poor/abused anywhere. But there's a clear difference in quality of life here.

[–] victorz 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

One could argue that you can be poor/abused anywhere. But there's a clear difference in quality of life here.

Very true. You've captured my exact sentiment here.

And also, the very fact that you can be poor even in rich countries is an even greater failure of the system. Nobody in a "rich" country should be impoverished. There are plenty of resources there to take care of everyone as long as we all work together. But the system rewards only those who work for themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luvs2Spuj 6 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Mobility is better now than it has ever been, so don't get too sad about that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WoodScientist 51 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

Wait til you learn that the reason you hate immigrants and immigration is that the wealthy conditioned you to hate them. Notice how capital can cross borders, but people can't? This allows the wealthy to profit off of international arbitrage, while regular citizens can't. A CEO can move a factory to a low cost country to save on labor, but you in a wealthy country can't move there to save on cost of living. And the citizens in a poor country can't move to a wealthy country to earn better wages. The corporations get to take advantage of international arbitrage, but you don't.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Corporations are people except when they're conveniently not!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

This is clearly a completely natural phenomenon, like the weather !

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dasus 25 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Black science man always talks like he's done weed for the first time and is trying to impress his nephew's friends.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 113 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

NDT the goat of saying rly dumb shit but everyone thinks it's somehow enlightening. he's like Jaden smith but Twitter likes him

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular 75 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I mean I agree with him here. It's ridiculous how we are still this tribalistic species while basically everyone would be better off when we would work together (e.g. climate change would be non-existent)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

It is possible to agree with something and still believe it is terribly presented.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Passports weren't a general concept until the end of the 19th century. Before they were mostly to allow passage to certain areas inside one country, rather than for movement between countries. There have been Identifications for Nobels and Diplomats though.

Anyways the whole concept is mostly a concept of modern nation states not of ancient tribalism.

[–] kn33 20 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

I think the point is that the tribalism led to the creation of the nations/states in the first place. I don't know enough to know if that's true, but that was my interpretation of their comment.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but... did you know, if you kiss a mirror you will always kiss yourself on the lips. How's that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 20 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

This needs one of those bell curve memes.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Only plebs wait in line. I put my request in an envelope, a government servant picks it up at my door and takes it to more government servants who do all the work before hand delivering it back.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

PSA: If all you have to do is wait in line, you're privileged af

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

You think that's bad? Every April I have to hand the country I live in a bunch of papers with numbers on them just to exist. If I don't, they send men with guns. How crazy is that?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί