this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
1305 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

6016 readers
3658 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MapleEngineer 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To be clear, it isn't free healthcare. In Canada we pay our taxes and the government administers the health insurance system. In Ontario where I live it's the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. It covers most doctors visits and most treatments. I have Hodgins Lymphoma and am nearing the end of my treatment. Dozens of doctors visits, CT scans, x-rays, an echo cardiogram, a respiratory study, two PET scans, and all the drugs and the only thing I've paid for out of pocket is parking, and the hospital where I'm being treated just put in free parking for cancer patients and gave me a parking pass. Our government negotiates the price of drugs at the national level and regulates drug prices. Companies aren't allowed to raise the price of a drug that is on the market unless there is a corresponding improvement in benefit to the patient. They can't add a coloured band to a capsule, rename the drug (Losec to Prilosec, for example) and double or triple the price. Generic drugs are the same. That's why epipens are $100 here and not $600 like in the US. There has been no substantion improvement in their benefit to patients so the price can't go up.

Universal healthcare isn't perfect but 22 of 23 highly developed countries in the world have it and the US profits before people system is grotesque.

[–] spicytuna62 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think many Americans in favor of universal healthcare think it's going to cost nothing. Of course, taxes will increase. But we already pay for private healthcare. Most of us via a payroll deduction.

[–] mojofrododojo 1 points 2 days ago

we not only pay for healthcare, compared to what the world pays, we pay for gold plated health care and get delivered garbage that bankrupts us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I don't like the term "free healthcare", because most of us would be paying for it in taxes, it would be more accurate to call it "socialized healthcare".

Saying "I want free healthcare" allows the media to twist your words and make you look like some "entitled brat" that "want everything for free".

[–] dohpaz42 59 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Keep it simple and call it “healthcare”. No need to qualify it with anything.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The ones who still think Obamacare and ACA are different things definitely need a catchy label and marketing if they're gonna vote for it.

Or just lie to them, their own leaders have learned it doesn't matter what you tell them. Call it the "everyone gets a puppy" Bill or whatever. Then tell them they got a free puppy. They won't know they didn't.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

This is exactly what we need to do. Its literally the only way to combat a populace that simply does not want to be educated. Just fuckin lie, then post your actual platform online. People who actually care will read it, everyone else will think that the dems are campaigning on eliminating the sun to cool the earth during the summer, and during the winter well just tow a new sun to orbit.

[–] halcyoncmdr 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They won't know they didn't.

We have concepts for a puppy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Counter-point: calling it universal/single-payer distinguishes it from what we have now. Which I would argue isn't actually healthcare, at least by modern standards in other countries...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Yeah, we don't have healthcare. We have profit-motivated health insurance. We pay in case we get injured or sick, and they only profit if they find a legitimate way to not cover us when we get injured or sick, so they try their damnedest to do that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But that sounds like socialism! We can't have that!

[–] spankmonkey 9 points 3 days ago

That would be like having some kind of socially based security!

[–] withabeard 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Single payer healthcare is fine.

The single payer is the government

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Freedom Care! Patriot Care!

Name it whatever. How do we get it?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] surewhynotlem 6 points 3 days ago
[–] Demdaru 6 points 3 days ago

Or ya know, simply Public Healthcare. Because it's for public. End of topic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Universal healthcare

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thats the problem. The media and too much of the usa wouldnt accept "socialized healthcare" becuase that sounds like socialism and enough people arent educated enough to know what that really means

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Medicare For All

Universal Healthcare

Single-Payer System

Whatever, someone needs better PR

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] credo 4 points 3 days ago

Insurance is already a socialized program- just a private one. Creating public health care simply removes the profit incentive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Charity is the bandaid covering a societal failure

[–] gAlienLifeform 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A bandaid that lets wealthy people get an ego boost and a tax write off

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

Let’s not forget that they create charitable ‘foundations’ which then work with lawmakers to create legislation, thus giving themselves greater influence over the relevant laws as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

I once tried to explain this to someone Christian, they just called me selfish.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think their issue is everyone getting it. In American culture and Christianity, love must be conditional.

Only correct behaviour would mean you get rewarded/supported.

Their issue isn’t giving it away for free, their issue is not being able to classify certain members of society as a underclass that don’t deserve anything unless they conform to their values.

So it’s about power and control. Universal health care means you have no power over these individuals and what values they live by.

[–] Agent641 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There's no virtue signalling in paying taxes

[–] captainlezbian 11 points 3 days ago

But there could be

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't call it "free", it sounds like you are so out of touch with reality that you don't know that healthcare has costs.

The word is "universal". In my country, I paying for healthcare, but not as much as wealthly people here do. That's the main argument for it: the rich subsidize healtcare for the poor.

[–] myplacedk 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In my country I pay for health INSURANCE through income tax. I get healthcare for free. I call it free because I don't pay to go to the doctor or the hospital. ** So why is this distinction important to me? Because this means I don't have to worry about paying for healthcare. I don't save any money by not going to the doctor. I don't loose access to health care if I loose my job. As long as I am a citizen here, money and healthcare are two unrelated concerns.

I know that money is going from my salary and in some way to the hospitals etc, there's no way around that. But this way I don't have to worry about it. Not when paying my bills, not when needing health care.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Exactly if it comes out of tax technically it isn't free but at the same time you also don't really notice it.

Saying that you pay for health care through taxes it's a bit like saying that you pay to walk down the street through taxes, technically of course you do pay to walk down the street through taxes, but it is such a bizarre thing to say.

[–] myplacedk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's actually a really good analogy. Most people would accept that going for a walk is free, and that tax money (in most cases) paid the path.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

In the UK everyone would say that healthcare is free. Obviously it isn't but it's not like you get a breakdown on your taxes so you don't really notice the fact that you're paying for it.

Even the belligerent idiots that try and move us over to a US style insurance system don't really articulate that healthcare costs money. It's such an abstract concert here.

[–] HowManyNimons 23 points 3 days ago (6 children)

In countries with government provided healthcare for all, we still do dance marathons to pay for bits of it. Ugh maybe it's just the UK.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

The marathons and stuff are to raise money for research more than to raise money for healthcare.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

She just wants to dance

[–] 2ugly2live 6 points 3 days ago

They don't want the possibility of helping everyone, there could be someone they don't like in there!

load more comments
view more: next ›