this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
681 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59881 readers
5148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hesusingthespiritbomb 3 points 1 hour ago

Jesus Christ it's like the SNL Pongo skit in real life.

[–] A7thStone 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

See there's the problem right there. They shouldn't have sold the robot. It should have been a subscription model, with micro transactions. That would have kept the investors flocking in.

I'd like to say this is sarcasm, but unfortunately it's the most likely lesson these ghouls will learn from this.

[–] ATDA 3 points 11 hours ago

Daily slot check in, pull the arm and the eyes display the slots. Ez money make me a CEO.

[–] LiamTheBox 5 points 11 hours ago

Its 2024 and you cannot use a product the way you want to. Can't you just use openAI api as the backend??

[–] Beardsley 14 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

What's the opposite of "eating the onion"? I thought this was satire for sure.

[–] maniclucky 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Pooped the onion? Honestly, I've only ever seen these kinds of stories as notTheOnion.

[–] TseseJuer 1 points 11 hours ago

wouldnt it be not eating the onion? or shoving up your rear end

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

winning a vickrey auction

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Onionphobia I guess.

[–] werefreeatlast 20 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Buy anything that must login to a web server not located at your house and expect it to get bricked when that server doesn't work anymore. Simple....don't. Plus they are clearly gaining something from you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Shit, I've a house?! Where have you been all my life? /s

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Klear 4 points 11 hours ago

So does the startup.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Wait, you can refund your kid?!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

thanks for the good laugh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

You can do anything if you complain loud and long enough

[–] kokesh 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It is sad to give your child emotional support robot to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 17 hours ago

I get the feeling, but tools come in many shapes and forms. If this was truly helpful for any kid, it's a fucking tragedy that's bricked.

I assume it relies on external servers for processing, so it was a matter of time though.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 21 hours ago

But the short-lived, expensive nature of Moxie is exactly why some groups, like right-to-repair activists, are pushing the FTC to more strongly regulate smart devices

Which will be harder in the next 4 years. On the other hand, maybe it sensibilizes more towards cloud-indepent operation and Open Source.

[–] SkunkWorkz 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Will it also brick for kids with refunds?

[–] moseschrute 2 points 15 hours ago

Will it brick the kid?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago

Nothing like this should ever rely on an external server.

[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 day ago (14 children)

All companies should be required to release their entire codebase under the GPL if the product is no longer going to be maintained by them.

That way a community of people who actually care can maintain and improve it.

I play several games that run on 20+ year old engines, long since abandoned by their original creators. The community reverse engineered the games and server infrastructure so they can still be run and enjoyed today. Same for all the folks who develop emulators and the entire ecosystem of ROM dumpers, readers, and handhelds that surround them.

Capitalism is a cancer. So amazing that, at least in certain parts of the software world, we have something better.

This is also a friendly reminder to donate to and support your favorite FOSS projects! they need all the help they can get. ❤️

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago

I'll do ya one further: Copyright should have the same lifespan as a patent. 20 years max. No extensions, no exceptions. I'd even cosider less time than that.

If you retained the unilateral rights to copy your idea for 20 fucking years and you haven't made your healthy profit on it already in that time, tough. Your work will forcefully enter the public domain so people who were likely actually still alive when it was culturally relevant get a shake with it.

There is no reason why something created during my childhood ought to still be languishing locked up in trust of some dead man's corporation by the time I've withered away of old age and my grandkids have done the same. The severe generational lag of culture and accessible technology created by copyright in its current form is absurd.

If you want to chase your golden goose forever, keep making new iterations of it that have their own copyrights that fairly compete against everyone else's in the marketplace of ideas. Get off your laurels. Get on your toes. Keep making new, inspired things. Earn your goddamn right to continue being seen as the rightful creator to follow up what you've previously made in the past.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Not just Foss, but also open hardware.

And Lemmy mods: stop banning open hardware projects. Just because we happen to sell stuff doesn't make us spam

[–] ilmagico 13 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

They are considering it making it open source, among other options to keep the robots alive

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

OpenAI started as open as well. Sadly

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

Awesome if that ends up happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] peopleproblems 99 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Man those parents. Oof.

I do not wanna be in their shoes.

Telling your kid that needed an emotional support robot friend that the robot friend is going to take a nap for a long time and might not wake back up? Ooo boy.

Helping a kid through a divorce is hard enough. This seems like a terrifying nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago

A parent with autism is probably seeing it as another "could've been" that they get to toss out now, likely paid for by insurance.

I wonder how big that pile of products is, failed crap marketed to insurance companies and parents for autistic kids.

Big business.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be fair, electronics break all the time, and living pets die eventually - both things everyone needs to learn how to cope with, including children. This is just the Venn Diagram of those two pieces of reality.

[–] peopleproblems 5 points 16 hours ago

I imagine the children with these things are emotionally disregulated in some way shape or form. A small group of children sometimes don't learn to self soothe when they are very young, others in ASD struggle with it for a lifetime. Some with ADHD have a very difficult time when their medicine wears off and their emotions kick back in to overdrive.

For all those groups I mentioned, the whole concept of this thing was almost brilliant. Something that they can go to knowing it will be able to help them guide through emotions while mom and dad are doing something necessary like cooking or fixing something outside, or in the bathroom.

If you haven't had to deal with a child that has emotional regulation problems, then it is hard to explain the difficulty that the failure of this device will make. It is true that they will adapt it, they always do, that's how things work. The problem is that the emotional disregulation leads to broken things at home, aggressive behaviors with peers, getting kicked out of preschool and day care, etc.

It truly is a nightmare scenario. The parents have to prepare for all of these things and a new way to help their child through the limited existing means.

[–] [email protected] 170 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Welcome to the "brand new world" of IOT hardware where you are the product and continued service depends entirely on how you can be monetized.

[–] shalafi 46 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I'm assuming it runs on AI and the company has to provide the backend. So yeah, if you purchase something that requires a company's infrastructure, it can certainly be bricked.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

I would like to think the community could work out the API's and replicate them on a free server, but if this was just a glorified Alexa box, there is probably a lot more server-side processing that needs to happen to keep it running.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No thanks. I'll get an emotional support cat and you can't brick my cat. Take that, big tech!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (29 children)

you can't brick my cat

Is this a challenge

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Careful with that one. Big pharma killed my cat once.

My cat came down with Feline Infectious Peritonitis which is a coronavirus that is lethal to cats when the virus mutates and becomes FIP. FIP is 100% fatal without treatment, and there is now a treatment (originally developed at UC Davis) that is now owned by a big pharma company. They shut down the feline clinical trials in 2020 because they also make Remdesivir, and there was a concern that if there were any problems with the feline drug trial, the FDA might not approve Remdesivir for COVID. You can buy the drug on the internet from China, but it's a 12 week course of twice daily injections, and you're gambling on whether you got a good batch every time you get a shipment.

By the time we found this out, it was too late to save our kitty, so he crossed the rainbow bridge.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What are the genuine use cases for such a robot? For when the kid has issues communicating with other people?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A robot has infinite patience and will never get mad or bully a child for fun. Ideally, this should also be true of a parent, but it's not. From a less grim angle, a robot doesn't have other responsibilities like work.

For a kid who feels too shy to talk to people, a robot can be good for practice. But it requires a lot of attentiveness from parents to make sure the child doesn't become dependent and moves on to taking to people once they get their confidence.

Back when drag was a kid, we used imaginary friends instead of robots. But a lot of parents and children don't believe in imaginary friends, which is a shame, because robots are a lot more expensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EnderMB 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's also probably a developmental aid also. As someone with a child, you'd be surprised at how laser-focused parents can be with regards to developmental delays or issues and ensuring that their kids have every opportunity to meet specific milestones.

IMO while it's absolutely not a replacement for human interaction, something like this with the right backing could be very useful to a lot of kids that need additional help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nucleative 19 points 1 day ago

I guess this device needed to connect to some remotely hosted server that enabled its functionality. And the company was losing money and hoping that sales would eventually pick up enough to make them profitable. But their latest investor decided not to put any more money in, and the company ran out of cash and can't pay its bills anymore.

The entrepreneur thought he could get more investor cash and ran the business in such a way that it would fall off a cliff if he didn't. And... He failed to secure more financing.

I have mixed feelings about products like this... If the device somehow needed to host an entire internet's worth of data to function, it certainly wouldn't have cost only $800. But when you buy a product that depends on the ongoing viability of the seller, you're in a position of caveat emptor - You better vet them out yourself, especially if they're new.

Hopefully the founders feel some emotional attachment to their product and the trust bestowed upon them by their unknowing customers, and release whatever on the back end makes the thing work so that motivated customers could reactivate their devices somehow.

load more comments
view more: next ›