this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
192 points (98.0% liked)

World Politics

789 readers
97 users here now


Political news from around the world.


No U.S, U.K, Ca, Aus, E.U politics

Posts must be related to Conflict, Politicians, Nation-states, Electoralism, or International Relations

Posts and Comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Volodymyr Zelenskyy has suggested a ceasefire deal could be struck if Ukrainian territory he controls could be taken "under the NATO umbrella" - allowing him to negotiate the return of the rest later "in a diplomatic way".

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That would really suck for the people under Russian occupation. But be really good for all the other people...

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 days ago

Probably the best option left now that Trump will just throw him to the wolves

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641 1 points 3 days ago

I can only watch

[–] x00z 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It would probably come with the safe passage to Ukraine...

[–] Mirshe 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It won't. Russia ABSOLUTELY needs those people because they've thrown hundreds of thousands of able-bodied men (and, reportedly, a lot of less-than-able-bodied men as well) into the meatgrinder for this war. That's part of why they've taken the old imperial strategy of deporting a LOT of the people in conquered areas to areas away from the fighting - it's part to get them out of the way, but also part to divorce them from that area, and make it a HELL of a lot harder to get back there (if there's even a "there" to go back to).

In other words, "we know we shoved you and your family into a bus at gunpoint and dumped you in Siberia, but if you wanna go home, you'll need to find your own way. Also don't forget rent is due the 1st."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and Russia was already facing a demographic crisis before the war. Its part of why they're kidnapping children.

[–] CitizenKong 8 points 4 days ago

Yep, they have an ongoing drug and AIDS crisis, and lost a lot of people to Covid since they only had their own vaccine, refusing other ones, which only worked in about half the cases though and which people were very sceptical of since the anti-vaccine propaganda on social media started by Russian bots to weaken the West backfired since Russians believed it as well.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fuck. I knew things were going badly for Ukraine, but not this badly.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

The US is providing a lot of resources to Ukraine and the second Trump takes over the White House, Ukraine loses that support.

[–] Maggoty 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is one of several things he's said in the last couple weeks. He essentially threw it out there during an interview to let NATO and Russia know that's a deal he'd take. He's also said they're going to fight until the Ruble reaches the center of the earth. (Not his exact words)

It's political messaging. They still have a lot of levers they can pull.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

That’s good to know. Thanks!

[–] Thcdenton 5 points 3 days ago

Erdogan just gonna veto it lol

[–] Blue_Morpho 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think he is being idealistic about Republicans' support for NATO. When Russia attacks Ukraine again, Trump will not support NATO.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Europe will, though, in full force. European Union even more so when Ukraine is a member

[–] nomous 4 points 3 days ago

This was my interpretation as well. Zelenskyy sees the writing on the wall, U.S. support has an expiration date. He needs to make his case now so he's part of NATO before Trump tries to hang Ukraine and NATO out to dry.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (4 children)

So is the parts of Ukraine under foreign occupation not gonna be part of NATO?

🤔

🤔🤔🤔

How's this gonna work?

[–] Maggoty 8 points 4 days ago

Ukraine would agree not to militarily contest those areas and would basically give up the ability to call on NATO in respect to them.

In return they'd have NATO troops, actual British, French, and German troops on the border of what is NATO daring Russia to do anything else. If it was anyone other than Trump in the White House the US would put a base in Ukraine and maintain an entire armored brigade in the area.

Kind of like China in the Korean War. Except we'd be getting a cease fire first instead of second.

[–] CMDR_Horn 12 points 5 days ago

That’s how I interpret it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Not unless Ukraine diplomatically gets it back from Russia, rather than through fighting, which is unlikely. It would effectively be Russian territory at that point.

[–] Badeendje 5 points 4 days ago

It would be part of the negotiations, so the most likely way it will work is that to cease hostilities, they agree on a line on the map and everything left of the line is NATO. Anything short of that would mean Putin crosses the line in a few years.

Then negotiate with Russia about returning occupied territories in exchange for... Lifting sanctions, returning cash, trade agreements, whatever.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anything where Ukraine doesn't end as a full NATO member I suicide for Ukraine and zelenski personally. Putin has shown he doesn't care, he won't stop, and any agreement made will be broken the second people turn their heads around.

Ukraine becomes a full NATO and European Union or they're dead, and I'm sure zelenski is VERY aware of this

[–] Maggoty 2 points 4 days ago

EU Defence pact would be a similar level of security, especially with Trump in the White House.