this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
539 points (99.6% liked)

196

16766 readers
3558 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carvex 81 points 1 month ago

"I love the poorly educated" - You know who

[–] krigo666 65 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Three big things:

  1. Compartmentalization of media (echo chambers)
  2. Tribalism (thanks Russia!)
  3. Macho culture (treating politics like a college football game except being LESS informed)

We'll never recover from this. This is the United States of Ignorance now. I'm deeply sorry to those who did their part and will be victims in the future, but it HAS to get worse before it can get better. We need a great reset in some form. Revolution, world war, alien invasion...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

This is sort of my train of thought, however, historically, when that sort of thing happens, very rarely is the resulting government a unfucked democratic nation.

I hope there are enough people with actual core American values that rise to the top if/when it happens.

My hopes aren’t high, but they’re not high with the status quo either.

[–] NikkiDimes 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] 5oap10116 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That would be amazing!

[–] LovableSidekick 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

LOL neither the media nor Russia created tribalism or echo chambers. They're just the digital equivalent of immigrants creating ethnic neighborhoods. People are more comfortable around others who speak their language and share their background. Give them all the variety in the world and most of them will flock to their own kind.

But I totally agree America is the United States of Ignorance and won't recover from it. Not just ignorance but incapability - in spite of a flourishing DIY culture, Americans in general can't DIY their way out of a WalMart. They don't even think up to them to solve anything, because every problem is either somebody else's direct fault or was inevitable because of conditions somebody else created. It's a nation of spectators whining that all the shows suck.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Well that went well didn’t it

[–] poplargrove 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I can guess what he means by the other points but I wonder how being more educated means being more free?

[–] PugJesus 49 points 1 month ago

Liberty consists of the capacity to make meaningful choices; those ignorant of their choices cannot possibly make them. Ignorance itself is a kind of tyranny which chains people.

[–] ChocoboRocket 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Harder to be taken advantage of if you know the means by which one takes advantage of another.

Knowing the wealthy need you more than you need them lets you make stronger demands and form unions.

Being knowledgeable gives you job security and independence, you have intrinsic value as a capable resource - and if spurned can become a troublesome enemy because you understand your opponent and can take advantage accordingly

Knowledge is absolutely power, and power gives you opportunity for freedom to choose how to live your life.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

one way is, that if you do not know the impact of policies, you cant make informed decisions about them and thereby lose control over your life and environment.

[–] thedirtyknapkin 10 points 1 month ago

because uneducated people are easy to lie to.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not strictly: he says only an educated people can be a free one, meaning that all free peoples are educated ones, but the inversion of that is "No uneducated people can be free". By that, I assume he means that uneducated people are far more susceptible to deception and manipulation compared to the educated that will be better able to detect lies, point them out and understand explanations of why that's bullshit.

As an example: If I tell you that the "vaccines cause autism" study was a) just a pilot study, not an actual one at scale, b) heavily fudged to the point that one scientist was kicked off the project for refusing to falsify results, c) only examined a specific vaccine, the MMR combination vaccine usually given to infants and d) led by a guy that had financial stakes in a company trying to sell individual vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella, you can probably smell the bullshit.

If I tried to explain that to someone who's not educated enough, they'll probably stare at me blankly, then shrug and say something to the effect of "Well, you never know what to believe these days" and change absolutely nothing about their stance.

Things get far worse when someone tells their base that some group is capturing and eating their pets and ends up inciting violence by people who take him at face value.


Edit: I don't know why I said "harmless" there. Anti-Vaxxers aren't harmless, even when compared to incitement of hate crimes.

[–] PugJesus 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I tried to explain that to someone who’s not educated enough, they’ll probably stare at me blankly, then shrug and say something to the effect of “Well, you never know what to believe these days” and change absolutely nothing about their stance.

Wow, I never knew I had conservative-related PTSD, but here I am having vivid and terrifying flashbacks to just that scenario.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I could try to come up with some bullshit home remedy solution and insist "That's what my pa alwys did, helps every time!" and when it doesn't work for you, double down angirly "Well it works for my pa, you're just doing it wrong"?

Or I could acknowledge that I'm not actually qualified, and all I can do is say "Sorry to remind you of that"

[–] LovableSidekick 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

We've now seen what the ignorance of 10 million who don't bother to show up can do.

That's how many Democrats voted in 2020 but not this year, and are blaming the results on "the party". Nope, it was you fucktwats.

[–] PugJesus 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Don't worry. Plenty of blame to go around. The fuckwad voters who enabled fascism by staying home, and the fuckwad party elite who couldn't find their own asses with both hands and a map and lost a lay-up election to fascism through their own venality and incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They suck at campaigning, but they aren't the worst at governing. An informed voter doesn't require razzle dazzle, but alas we are in short supply of informed voters. I don't see that turning around anytime soon, so buckle up buttercup!

[–] TotallynotJessica 6 points 1 month ago

Nah, they suck most at governing. People were tired of things getting worse every year under Democrats. Things get worse faster under Republicans, but the Democrats didn't do enough to prevent our societal decay into feudalism. They're corrupt as fuck, especially where they have supermajorities. Every law to address problems is another scheme that helps the rich. They never take a stand against business, not understand that there is currently no way to serve both capital and labor.

[–] PugJesus 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm looking forward to get my crippled ass Aktion-T4ed in the coming years, so you could say I'm buckled up

[–] NikkiDimes 11 points 1 month ago

Well, ooooobviously that's because the democrats cheated in 2020 and then inexplicably, while in power, decided not to cheat in 2024. Obviously.

Massive /s.

[–] bestagon 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No I voted and still blame them. People were vocal about their concerns and intentions to not vote months before the election and the campaign ignored them and somehow that isn’t their fault.

Also the 10 million, like you said, were ignorant. It wasn’t the ultra-impassioned grandstanders that affected an election. It was people that saw the last 4 years relatively boring politics as a license to tune out and figured this election wasn’t something they needed to worry about. Those people exist in far FAR higher numbers than anybody actually paying attention

[–] LovableSidekick 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think repeatedly telling people how important voting is and pleading with them to vote and to get other people to vote is "ignoring" it. What I blame the Democratic party for is not cultivating younger candidates for years and years. There should have been a broader field of viable candidates to narrow down based on public opinion, or at the very least grooming Harris as a likely candidate throughout Biden's term instead of swapping her in as an emergency backup. Having said that, there's no excuse for "I'm not voting because there isn't a good enough candidate!" is the mentality of petulant high school sophomores who refuse to brush their teeth because they're mad at mom for making them miss soccer practice to go to a dentist appointment - I mean, she's such a bitch, I'm just gonna let my teeth rot in protest!

[–] bestagon 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For sure, but if you tell that kid to just fall in line because you know better, you’re going to get an even more obstructive petulant response to your request. You have to meet people as individuals and let them in on the vision if you want them to be invested in it. Most of the messaging I saw however, was people taking any and all opportunity to display their superiority to anyone that doesn’t immediately fit into the plan

[–] LovableSidekick 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We're talking about voters not kids, and if you think the message was, "Just fall in line because I know better," you weren't paying attention. The Harris campaign bent over backwards to warn people about the dangers of an impending Trump dictatorship. Some people just didn't listen, or they can't see significant differences between the Harris and Trump. I can't even engage with any of that, because to me it's as stupid as insisting the Earth is flat. Whatever, we are where we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder why he ended up with a bullet in his head.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because.......

Grandpa Joe worked with the mob rum-running, in order to amass the family fortune, and fhey in turn delivered several major cities in the election, but then JFK let RFK Bobby loose on an aggressive anti-racketeering rampage

Among other reasons ofc

[–] LovableSidekick 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Kennedy's adult audience had lived through an economic boom they felt was the direct result of education and information. In the 40s millions of Americans received free education and training, either in the military or for skilled war production jobs, and/or were put through college with the postwar GI bill. The 50s saw an economic boom that heavily promoted education as the key to prosperity and national security.

Today's audience thinks it's the smartest, best informed generation in history because pretty much all of human knowledge is available with a few clicks, but instead of exploring that limitless pool spends its free time scrolling through arguments about uninformed opinions and who should be demonized for Liking the wrong posts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkCloud 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think the educated do know that last part anymore. i spent a decade (2014-2024) in rightwing spaces mostly on reddit... I didn't see too many other lefties in them arguing against the alt-right.

Most lefties ignore the majority rightwing places like the plague. They're not out there trying to save democracy by educating one voter at a time. They're just not.

[–] PugJesus 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

In the defense of the left, going into right-wing online spaces to try to change someone's mind is probably one of the worst uses of one's time possible. At least at a protest you can't get banned by an assmad mod.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ChocoboRocket 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you're trying to reason someone out of an opinion they didn't reason themselves into, you're not gonna do anything but act as a straw man for people to make into whatever they want to attack

Yes, it's absolutely vital to reach across the isle and offer understanding and share knowledge, but you're also up against a national propaganda system that is universally accessible.

The only two real avenues of change are

people getting negatively affected enough that the wealthy may potentially lose their status quo so they're willing to capitulate to the middle class in a small way that keeps their illusion intact

Or, you are able to humanize yourself and your views in a way that successfully removes the difference between left/right culture war and reframe it as a top/bottom class war.

Usually best accomplished by demonstrating that most people want the same things and aren't as different as Media tries to make us. This realization will also be worn down over time in the face of (now) every media source available inventing realities to explain how everything is correct, going to plan, and paradise is just over one more horizon of tax cuts, austerity, and diminished rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›