this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
199 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19286 readers
2499 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Republican Party is poised to hold a historically narrow House majority, with current projections showing 220 GOP seats to Democrats’ 215.

This would be the smallest majority since the Hoover administration.

Resignations by three Republican representatives, including Matt Gaetz, could further shrink the margin to 217–215, allowing a single defector to block legislation.

The tight results undermine Republican claims of a 2024 electoral landslide, as Donald Trump’s popular-vote margin over Kamala Harris has narrowed significantly since election night.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 79 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This would be the smallest majority since the Hoover administration.

Coincidentally, we're going to have a tariff war just like the Hoover administration. One that sucked so much they named a vacuum brand after it.

(Not really.)

[–] partial_accumen 53 points 1 month ago

we’re going to have a tariff war just like the Hoover administration.

We all learned about the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act in the wildly popular 1986 documentary Ferris Bueller's Day Off. source

[–] Today 30 points 1 month ago

You should add that to the Low Quality Facts community.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aw man, can't we still call the Sanctuary Districts?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Bell riots are so last season.

[–] Botzo 7 points 1 month ago

Trump Tower will be what you call the bunk bed you have to get to have another roommate!

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 2 points 1 month ago

Trump mansions!

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 month ago (4 children)

more infighting amongst republicants hopefully means nothing gets done for two years.

what would be really entertaining is a few of them jump ship and vote with the minority... giving the gavel and committee chairs to democrats.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But we’re in the bad timeline, so a congressional logjam means that he takes lots of executive actions, the bought SCOTUS lets him and Congress can’t pass anything to stop him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I've been disappointed enough this past decade. I'll call it the Trump Rule: Things will always be worse than you imagine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

The jumping can happen both ways

[–] Eatspancakes84 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I worry a lot more about Dems appeasing the GOP at this moment. Unlike Trumps first election, there is now basically no resistance, and there’s already infighting among Democrats. Someone who unites the party must stand up now, or I don’t see any improvement in the midterms.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

If you're expecting resistance, don't look at the Democratic Party. Resistance will come from the grassroots or not at all.

[–] Ensign_Crab 4 points 1 month ago

more infighting amongst republicants hopefully means nothing gets done for two years.

They're not Democrats. They don't campaign on one thing and discover just enough votes to block it.

[–] CharlesDarwin 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

What is that margin down to now, by the way? Calling donvict's "win" a landslide is absurd, IMHO. And that's without even engaging in any of the suspicions about the vote...

[–] Today 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Last time i checked he was at 50.00% of total votes.

ETA- yeah, AP shows him at 50; her at 48.4.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

1.6% more votes than Harris.

[–] PumpkinSkink 9 points 1 month ago

It's continuing resolutions all the way down

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's 3 or 4 convictions from flipping the House, in the unlikely event that the Dems can maintain solidarity.