this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
129 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3332 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

After Donald Trump’s 2024 victory, many politically engaged Black women are reassessing their role as key organizers in U.S. democracy.

Despite 92% supporting Kamala Harris, Black women expressed disillusionment over their contributions being met with indifference.

Historically at the forefront of social change, some are now prioritizing rest and mental health, shifting away from the “backbone” role in movements.

While some fear this withdrawal could leave gaps in advocacy, others argue it’s time for other groups to step up, as Black women grapple with the nation’s lack of solidarity with their concerns.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] verdantbanana 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

“It’s like the people have spoken and this is what America looks like,” said Smith, the Los Angeles-based founder of the advocacy social media agency, Get Social. “And there’s not too much more fighting that you’re going to be able to do without losing your own sanity.”

definitely a real feeling

it is what America has been looking like for far too long

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago

I've seen it described as when you spend time and energy helping a friend get away from an abusive ex, only to see them get back together

[–] errer 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

“Giving up” when you lost the last election by a measly 1.5% seems like exactly the wrong thing to do…

[–] PugJesus 48 points 3 days ago (7 children)

1.5% in an election by a well-spoken (relatively) young and intelligent experienced government official, running against a psychotic retiree-age fascist with apparent dementia, a room-temperature IQ, with a history of sex scandals and rape (as confirmed by the courts, no less) while running as the candidate for Christianity and moral purity, running in stark opposition to both the free market and the welfare state, openly despising women, ethnic, religious, and gender minorities, advocating for genocide, bootlicking our national enemies, and corruption... all with a prior four-year term with all of that on display, so we all could be certain it wasn't 'just rhetoric'.

There are only a few realistic conclusions one can potentially draw from that.

  1. Most of America simply does not give a shit about what happens to minorities.

  2. Most of America wants bad fucking things to happen to minorities.

  3. America was so freaked out at the prospect of a mixed-race woman becoming president they decided what happens to minorities was less important than stopping that.

  4. Any combination of the above.

There's not a lot of room for "Well, I get that they wanted a 2.5% lower tax rate on the rich..." This was an election against outright fascism. And most voters said "Yeah, let's go with that."

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Many people that voted for Trump did so because Fox news said to, or Newsmax, or their family, or Joe Rogan, or Elon Musk, etc. The right has a vast disinformation network that hand waves or disputes all of those facts. It's all bullshit of course and anyone who digs into it at all would realize that. Nobody has managed to put a dent in that disinformation silo. People who were super into conspiracy theories ignored all of the actual shenanigans and chose to believe stupid shit that fit their bias.

At this point their entire identity is built around a pack of lies. The cognitive dissonance is layered on so thick they have a sound bite dead end for any question. If they chose to believe the truth it would mean that they're the worst kind of idiot and have actively been a puppet and a piece of shit for at least 8 years. They can't admit that kind of failure. The moral injury is too great.

So what would have to happen is some sort of scandal that exposed all of their media silos and revealed something unbearable by their dear leader. That would give them the escape hatch to admit being fooled, but fooled by a masterful conspiracy that nobody could have seen through. That sort of event is such a high bar I don't know what would do it.

A lot of his supporters won't survive him breaking both social security, Medicare, and most other federal institutions. They'll have a maga flag at the funeral too.

Maybe his inevitable demise will happen sooner than later. You'd think they planned for that, but they've been pants on head stupid at everything else and blundered into success for so long I doubt it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Trump got more votes in 2020 than in 2016 by a large margin. Don't forget the pandemic was still in full swing in 2020. In 2024 more people voted for him than 2020.

Whatever their reasoning, people are looking at this guy and they like what they see.

[–] errer 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not disagreeing with anything you’re bring up, I just feel that 1.5% is small enough that the next election could easily swing the other way, unless the organizers give up en masse. Then we’re surely fucked.

[–] PugJesus 3 points 2 days ago

I'm only saying that being demoralized by this whole shitshow is an entirely reasonable reaction, especially from minority groups.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

You're leaving out election tampering. At the very least there was rampant voter suppression, but there's data being found that points to actual fraud.

[–] nifty 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The win wasn’t about any culture related stuff, don’t spread that idea.

People voting republican will always be stupider on average, and they genuinely believed that the tariffs were going to help them.

All of this is related to the economy, which retail execs helped worsen because of price increases. It’s all economic pressures being painted as cultural stuff.

The culture war is a distraction, the only real thing is the class war. Once people have better economic conditions, they’re flexible on sorts of social progress. Look at the Nordic countries ffs.

Countries which want to save themselves from fascism and oligarchs should implement the Nordic model at scale.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/06/10/european-elections-far-right-on-the-decline-in-nordic-countries_6674410_4.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model

Edit to remove judgmental tone

[–] Ensign_Crab -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are only a few realistic conclusions one can potentially draw from that.

You would rather believe conclusions that suggest the party should abandon minorities entirely than consider for an instant that Democrats' decades-old strategy of moving to the right has failed.

[–] PugJesus 3 points 2 days ago

Yes, abandoning minorities is definitely what I suggested, good going, top-tier literacy. /s

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That 1.5% would probably be explained by Harris's very real flaws you're ignoring right now. Harris's campaign was a massive middle finger to the working class, so she didn't get votes. Trump was at least saying he'd do things for the working class, so he got votes.

This was an election against outright fascism.

Most voters demonstrably don't care about that. They care about what candidate will do for them and to that Harris said "haha nothing get fucked".

[–] PugJesus 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most voters demonstrably don’t care about that.

Yeah, so

Most of America simply does not give a shit about what happens to minorities.

Thanks for agreeing with me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You are right on that count, however the comment you were replying to is right that Harris's campaign had serious flaws when it comes to connecting with the material needs of working-class and left voters.

Her position on Gaza, her position on fracking, her following campaign advice from her brother in law and advisors to the MIC, not pushing for higher minimum wage or universal healthcare, etc etc.

And she wasn't really a progressive candidate outside of her race and gender. She was a right leaning centrist running against a regressive. That doesn't make her progressive, just better than the other option.

So I would add DNC messaging and campaign strategy to your list of four things above. But to be clear, I think it's a combination of many factors, including everything that you mentioned.

[–] PugJesus 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So I would add DNC messaging and campaign strategy to your list of four things above.

No, the DNC fucked up bad, but their failure still proves point number 1 - if the DNC being fuckups is enough for a voter to vote for or allow fascism, they don't give a fuck about minorities.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Nah you're right.

The US was okay with seeing a black woman as vice president, but they were never going to let a black woman take over the master's house.

Ate some mushroom and remembered some things I had been forgetting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

You are acting like no minorities voted for Trump or stayed home.

And even in this post you admit that the DNC ran a bad campaign. So how is messaging not a major factor in how people voted? Or why they decided this election wasn't important to participate in?

And there's also a thing people do when they are in an abusive relationship with somebody, and I believe the country is in an abusive relationship with Trump, where they minimize.

I've seen a lot of that post-election, oh he didn't do that much damage his first four years we will be fine. Oh, you know he talks a lot but he doesn't do half of the things he says. Etc. etc.

I guess what I am saying is that we don't need to chalk up to malice what can be attributed to ignorance. Especially considering the propaganda bubble most Americans live in.

[–] Carrolade 15 points 3 days ago

It's not too different from the oxygen masks on an airliner: secure your own mask first before you help others. You always have to make sure you're healthy and well first, and then you can focus on taking care of business.

Given the blow to morale this had, I have nothing against people that need to take a break for their own wellbeing. I don't think most are permanently out of the game though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

That's probably a seriously bad sign for the continued visibility of the Democratic Party...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

They are always called to help but never get help in return. They are used as political pawns, tossed aside after the oligarchy extracts what they need from black women

[–] just_another_person -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The colors are of the oldest black sorority AKA. Maybe the letters are from a slogan or her local chapter.