this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
96 points (98.0% liked)

News

25063 readers
4549 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] capt_wolf 79 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was obviously the plan all along.

Bullshit...

[–] disguy_ovahea 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think Merchan would’ve sentenced him had he lost the election.

[–] capt_wolf 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Perhaps...

Giving him the benefit of the doubt, the pressure was huge. Like the rest of his cases, nobody wanted to be the one who threw an ex-president in jail. However, he instead decided to play chicken to see if his job would get done for him, and it was. Now he gets to wash his hands of it.

Regardless, this is a complete failure of the justice system and he needs to step down or be removed. We don't need biased judges who are too afraid to do their job.

[–] gibmiser 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Noone wanted to be the judge who stood up and loudly declared that a president is not above the law? That seems weird

[–] A_Filthy_Weeaboo 8 points 2 months ago

I second this...

But with these MAGA wackos, his life would have been on the line...

Now that I think about it, aren't judges sworn to uphold the law and the constitution over anything else, let's say their life?

Almost like he may not have been qualified to uphold that part of his job...

(End of rambling thought)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Nothing has been decided yet, the prosecution has asked that the case be frozen until the end of Trump's term, and so he has given Trump's team their legal right to submit a motion for dismissal. He is likely to take to pausing the trial as the prosecution has asked for. And I do believe if Trump had lost we would have gotten a sentence, but him winning makes him "quasi" immune until the end of his term.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 4 points 2 months ago

Cool. I think Merchan is a fucking traitor.

[–] themeatbridge 37 points 2 months ago

Our entire justice system is a kangaroo court.

[–] danekrae 35 points 2 months ago

Just keep sitting on your ass america and let it happen... Just like you're used to...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Hey this is totally fair, it would be the exact same for anyone who became president

/s

[–] FlyingSquid 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Did any of you really think he was going to face any consequences?

[–] FlexibleToast 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only if he wasn't reelected.

[–] gofsckyourself 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlexibleToast 4 points 2 months ago

I didn't say appropriate consequences, but there would have been something.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I admit I got got. But I figured fines and "probation" were it.

[–] CaptPretentious 4 points 2 months ago

I had hoped. But I also hope to win the lotto. And of the two I felt like me winning the lotto was more likely.

Elected or not, I seriously doubted anything would happen. Via he bribes the right people, the people who were literally worshiping him do what they can to get charges dropped, or the whole proceeding would take so long he just dies old age.

[–] NocturnalMorning 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We treat everybody the same in our legal system

[–] Late2TheParty 5 points 2 months ago

Hahahaha... Oh, wait. Ah, fuck! 😞

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

This just PROVES that the ONLY Way to Beat the Court system is to THREATEN TO MURDER THE JUDGES FAMILY and IGNORE the Judge no matter WHAT he says like Trump did!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

What the absolute horse-riding gigafuck?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

any decision about whether the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision applies to Trump's criminal hush money case.

IANAL but I'm also not a fucking moron - he was a candidate for president, not president. This case has nothing to do with presidential immunity.

On Wednesday, Trump's attorneys argued in a letter to the court that the criminal conviction must be dismissed "to facilitate the orderly transition of Executive power."

The incumbent president has no responsibility "to facilitate the orderly transition of Executive power" but some criminal case judge in NYC does?