this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
102 points (100.0% liked)

196

16509 readers
3096 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some more pictures:


all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Psythik 13 points 2 hours ago

Firefox is Netscape; this makes no sense and shouldn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 hours ago

AOL is so stupid that they didn't have the guts to use Firefox as a base.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How is it that so many companies can literally skin another company and wear its skin as a bodysuit and we do not collectively recoil in psychological horror?

How are so many people germane to this concept?

This is invasion of the body snatchers but for companies that determine the livelihood of essentially every human being on the planet. It's fucking terrifying.

[–] ScruffyDucky 21 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

Aeh perut merh HAUNDS. Onen merh HEAURD

[–] univers3man 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like some kinda eggar suit

[–] SpaceNoodle 1 points 44 minutes ago
[–] Sanctus 46 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

It kinda just looks like Chrome forked to change the Google logos to Netscape and thats it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 hours ago

That's almost every chromium browser out there, most don't even bother to change the skin and user interface from the chromium default.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps there's extra tracking ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 hours ago

Now you can get tracked by Google and Netscape! It's a 2 for 1 deal!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Didn't Netscape basically become Mozilla?

[–] NickwithaC 15 points 4 hours ago

Yes which makes this even dumber. They could just as easily have launched a Firefox fork.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Just before Netscape was purchased they open-sourced their browser, and the Mozilla organization formed to continue the open-source Netscape codebase as the Mozilla Suite. So, basically yeah, the actual Netscape code became Mozilla and the Netscape legal entity just became a Yahoo subsidiary that they did fuck all with

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds like Yahoo alright

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

It honestly blows my mind that yahoo is even a thing anymore. I can't think of the last time they got something right, yet they keep shuffling along.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Data harvesting is a lucrative business. You don’t need to have a good product with todays internet, you just need to have access to a lot of insanely personal data, and yahoo has both an expansive advertising network and hosts hundreds of millions of email accounts. They're just Google except they don't pretend to care about anything else

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

They can keep shuffling along, though. If you don't have to pay for active development of features, maintenance of their existing product lines is relatively cheap.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

you missed the bit about aol buying netscape in 1998.

netscape continued but under aol's structure. aol disbanded the netscape group in 2003, which is when mozilla foundation launched and took over development.

aol continued to release netscape on its own until v9 in early 2008. last two versions were based on mozilla's new firefox, not the legacy browser suite.

yahoo got mixed in when verizon bought aol in 2015 and most of yahoo in 2016, and combined them. later sold verizon media (the aol/yahoo combination, fka oath, nka yahoo) to vultures (apollo) in 2021. apparently the netscape trademark remains with the remnants of aol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Ah, I felt like I had forgotten a few parts. My bad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

Looks like just a shitty theme but everything Chrome retained. What a waste.

[–] perviouslyiner 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Sorry, I already annihilated the VM.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I vaguely recall its last version was an internet explorer skin too. So, 2 steps forward 1 step back?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Had to refresh my knowledge of that era.

But it was Netscape version 8 that let users use the Trident engine (internet explorer).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trident_(software)

Under use cases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

to render web pages in IE mode

Sounds like a separate mode for compatibility reasons back when websites had that "Best viewed in Internet Explorer" badge

Plus, 8 wasn't the last release either

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a separate mode for compatibility

Yeah it was, I don't know if they kept the feature in v9. It stopped being relevant a long time before that either way.

I never made a claim to the accuracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

i was just saying that i don’t think they ever became an ie skin lol