this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
66 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2116 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] makeshiftreaper 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's cute that the Democrats think they're going to be allowed to run in 2028 or that there will be an election at all

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think that's how it will go down. He's stupid and will just run the same play again, but with more stooges this time.

There will be elections, and Democrats will absolutely be able to run. But if Trump (he's already joked about running again) or his pick do not win, then Vance will not certify the election. Eventually that will land at the Supreme Court, and then it's anyone's guess as to whether or not they follow the constitution or just make up bullshit to support their agenda.

[–] makeshiftreaper 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You have far more hope than I do. Republicans are dogs chasing cars, they know what they want, they just don't know what happens after. They want a permanent Christo-fascist government and we just handed them all the power to make it happen. People keep saying "there's rules about this, there's procedures, we have safeguards" as if that impeded him at all in his first term. The only hope I have is that they're too stupid and incompetent to pull it off

[–] candybrie 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even Putin pretends to have elections.

[–] makeshiftreaper 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That sentence does not inspire hope

[–] candybrie 2 points 1 month ago

It's not really meant to. But there will very likely still be elections that have Democrats in them. It's just a question of how competently they make them a sham.

[–] AbidanYre 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It probably wasn't meant to.

But sham elections are still elections.

[–] Stiffneckedppl 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No...they aren't. That's the whole point.

[–] AbidanYre 2 points 1 month ago

The argument here seems to be completely eliminate elections like the British monarchy vs sham elections like Putin.

Either way it's bad for America.

[–] pigup 1 points 1 month ago

Hot is cold, white is black, up is down.

[–] ChocolateTeapot 1 points 1 month ago

And don't forget that they like infighting, I'm hoping they tear each other apart!

[–] Eldritch 8 points 1 month ago

If they assume that and pre-capitulate it may as well be. These are the right motions to be making whether or not any of these are even the right people. Whether or not there will be free and fair elections again. The only way there will be is if we fight.

[–] Ensign_Crab 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's gonna be Newsom. And he'll move to the right and lose. And centrists will blame the left and move to the right.

[–] dhork -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

No, Newsom has a chance to win, because he doesn't have a vagina. Apparently having one is a disqualifying factor for many voters.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Harris was beating the pants off of Trump when she was seen as a progressive. she lost because she went right.

The trumpists were right though. She went to the right to emulate Clinton, tried to flip Texas and lost. Just like they called out.

[–] dhork 10 points 1 month ago

If I recall correctly, back then Lemmings didn't want to vote for her because she was a cop.

[–] Ensign_Crab 6 points 1 month ago

No, Newsom has a chance to win, because he doesn’t have a vagina.

Anything to avoid admitting that moving to the right has failed.

[–] blattrules 27 points 1 month ago

How about stopping, doing some self reflection for a bit and then start running again at an appropriate time? Whoever becomes the front runner is going to be dragged through the mud for the next four years on right wing media. One of the things that worked well for Kamala was that the republican strategy was focused on Biden and they didn’t pivot well…ultimately it didn’t matter, but don’t give them extra time now.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Holy hell .. who cares ... the US is just turning into one giant never ending election campaign.

[–] Eatspancakes84 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree… but it apparently works. Somehow people vote for the person who is now on a 9 year long continuous campaign. I remember he had a campaign rally 3 months into his presidency. Would love for it to be different, but there are simply no penalties for running forever campaigns.

[–] dhork 3 points 1 month ago

He did that so quickly because he knows how to skim money out of campaigns. I bet he will start a campaign fund for 2028, even though he is ineligible, "just in case".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hope I'm out of the US by 2028. Fuck this dumpster fire of a country.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

2028…? 👌😆🤣 It’s all over but the crying.

You can thank Merrick Garland.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm gonna vote for who ever Shawn Fain tells me to vote for and I doubt it gonna be a fucking limp dick democrat or a cop

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The Democrats won't have absorbed the Guillotine Party by 2028.