this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
372 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2905 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)

America's and American media's acceptance of this kind of political leader is a sign of the country's mental decline

[–] Zacpod 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We're witnessing the decline and fall of the Roman empire in real-time. It's heartbreaking. Still time to recover, I hope, but when damn close to half the populace vilifies intelligence while embracing ignorance it's a petty thin hope.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

At least we're gonna get that sick-ass Roman meme culture!

[–] PostProcess 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How often do you think about the ~~Roman~~ American empire?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

How often do you think about the ~~Roman~~, ~~British~~, ~~Mongol~~, ~~Russian~~, ~~Spanish~~, ~~Abbasid~~ American empire?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

Raises questions? And I suppose Snoop Dogg might start smoking weed

[–] ArtVandelay 36 points 1 month ago

This headline could be 2 hours or 2 years old

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

I like to imagine that he has a team of doctors propping him up for each appearance.

Remember he wanted Biden drug tested? Yeah, that's projection.

His Drs carefully manage a cocktail of meds to maintain his virility. Uppers, downers, vitamins, protein, prophylactics, diuretics, the works. The thing is, they thought that with careful management if the dosage they could stave off the inevitable crash until after November 5th, sadly though his 78 year old mind just can't take it and he's falling apart.

That's what I like to imagine anyway.

[–] Raiderkev 18 points 1 month ago

That photo has great meme potential

[–] Red_October 10 points 1 month ago

It won't change anything. Nobody who still intends to vote for him is going to suddenly change their mind because he's lost his. People aren't voting for him because of his policies, they're voting for him because of either their impression of his personality, or because he's not a Democrat. There just aren't going to be people who see THIS mental decline as the deciding factor while all the rest of the evidence that the pants-shitting dementia-patient wasn't fit to manage his own medication, much less the country, just wasn't quite enough.

[–] PorradaVFR 9 points 1 month ago

“Illustrate” “Comfirm” “Demonstrate” “Verify” “Highlight” “Are a stark, clear and empirical evidence of”

There were better ways to frame the story.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tehfishman 2 points 1 month ago

Same as it ever was

[–] Etterra 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What questions? Any idiot can tell he's fucking senile.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

unfortunately I've come to the conclusion that nearly half of this nation is comprised of idiots.

[–] EvilBit 9 points 1 month ago

s/raise/answer/g

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

a man so covered, and publicized, and branded, and orange...and they are just NOW noticing?

[–] ripcord 4 points 1 month ago

Ive been seeing this headline once a week (or maybe month) for 8 fucking years. Stop raising questions and fucking admit the answer already

[–] JeeBaiChow 4 points 1 month ago

Colbert said he dances like he's jerking off two horses and enjoying it. I see it now. Cant unsee.

[–] Buddahriffic 4 points 1 month ago

But, but, he once took a test where he had to identify complex things like a man, woman, a camera, and perhaps other objects that were in his line of sight while he was bragging about it and the doctors concluded that he was indeed conscious at the time of the test! Has ~~Obama~~ Hillary been able to prove ~~his~~ her consciousness to doctors?? So vote Trump/Pence on November 5th and vote often!

Gets confused about who is talking to him before remembering the ear piece

Who the fuck is Harris and Vance? Biden's VP? But Biden is the VP. And I thought his name was Pence.

Guys, guys, get this, this guy in my ear says that the government is so bloated that even the VP has a VP! We need to build a wall to keep those VPs out of my swamp!

[–] RampantParanoia2365 2 points 1 month ago

How so? His mental decline has been well established for some time now.

[–] Coreidan 2 points 1 month ago

There is no mental decline. His mind has always been a dumpster fire.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 1 month ago

PBS News Hour - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for PBS News Hour:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trumps-rambling-speeches-raise-questions-about-mental-decline
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support