How... How did it break up in orbit? It should be effectively weightless, and depending on the altitude it shouldn't experience much, if any, atmospheric drag, right? Did they forget to fasten the bolts on it or something?
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
149 points (99.3% liked)
News
23599 readers
3518 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh no, orbit is actually quite hostile. Specially unexpected torque forces from spinning in unplanned ways. And there's very little but definitely present atmospheric drag. Not so much from the density of the air but from the extremely high speed it's moving. Then there's orbital debris. Also extreme and fast changes in temperature from the sun. Not to forget cosmic radiation.
This thing was in geostationary orbit, that's a long way away where there is no atmospheric drag. There's also very little orbital debris there because there is less stuff launched that far out and the orbit is much bigger, so the chances of a collision are vanishly small. Temperatures are an issue, but this thing lived out there for years, so it probably was designed pretty well for that. Same with unexpected movement, any leaks or software errors would have presented way before now.
Something like this breaking up is very strange. It could be a software patch that went wrong and sent the thing tumbling, but there are usually a couple of safeguards against such a thing. Plus any recently patched satellite is monitored very carefully.
So either an extreme fuckup or some kind of foul play. This could be a test of a satellite weapon, a deliberate sabotage for some reason or a software patch that went very wrong. It could also just be extremely dumb luck with it hitting some kind of debris or piece of rock, but like I said in geostationary orbit that's not likely.
Edit: I just read this thing has had issues early in life, so it might be related to that. So that makes malfunction likely.
China's always dicking around in space, really wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't a "test" gone "wrong". Doubt we'll know the truth anytime soon.
"On Saturday an “anomaly” caused it to unexpectedly break apart, a statement from Intelsat said, bringing a halt to communications.
The Intelsat IS-33e satellite’s approximately 20 pieces of debris from the craft now in orbit is being tracked by the U.S. Space Force."
they don't know and they're trying to find out what happened
Space junk is flying all over the place above our planet at super-high speed. Even a small fleck of paint is moving faster than a bullet and can do serious damage. If the satellite got hit by something bigger, it could lead to a complete structural failure. I'm guessing things like the solar wind would take care of the rest.
I could also have been foul play. We are going to see more of that in the near future.
I'm not sure chickens can make it into orbit unless they're frozen first.
I'm suspecting you of fowl play here!
bagErk!
Possibly, but considering where it says it is serving, it would be an odd target IMO.
Most satellites are in low-earth orbit where drag is minimal, not nonexistent. Further out adds too much latency and weakens the signal too much for most commercial applications.
Are most communications satellites in LEO? Can you do a geostationary LEO? I thought you had to be higher. This definitely sounds like a geostationary satellite if it is affecting a specific part of the planet.
Can you do a geostationary LEO?
No, those are mutually exclusive.
But you can have communication satellites in LEO, see: Starlink.
I knew Starlink was in LEO, but I don't think this satellite was based on the description.
Orbits and their height are determined by the speed the object is moving at. Getting into orbit isn't about getting something very high, it's about getting it moving very fast. Geostationary height is the height that the object is moving at the same rotational speed as the body it's orbiting. Any lower or higher and it won't be geostationary anymore.
Pretty sure that means there was a whistle-blower on board.
Might be hard to keep a person on the tiny thing, but they probably uploaded the proof of their law breaking there thinking it'd be safe in space.
Eh, you'd be surprised how compact a human body can be with 16k psi!
I didn't have 'Boeing causes Kessler Syndrome' on my 2024 bingo card, but I probably should have.
I'm pretty sure i did actually, i think it was on a thread about the astronauts who are still stranded
The hits just keep on a-comin'
Boeing killed John Barnett