this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
629 points (96.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26537 readers
3064 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draconic_NEO 24 points 1 day ago

The one on the left is a MAGA, they're unable to listen to logic even if the answer is right in front of them.

[–] Thcdenton 242 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Goddamn cardies....

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 188 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What it feels like having a conversation with conservatives

[–] GrammarPolice 51 points 2 days ago (25 children)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess it’s all a matter of cultural conditioning but growing up in Scandinavia this kind of rhetoric was always associated with right-wingers and other liberals whereas “both sides” was more common for progressives and leftists. The most common I saw was the one-persons-terrorist-is-another-persons-freedom-fighter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trolololol 11 points 1 day ago

There's 3 lights

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I can’t see four. I’m sure it’s there, it just doesn’t appear to me.

[–] ameancow 6 points 1 day ago

Originally it was supposed to be an optical illusion that looks like three or four rods from different angles.

This edit has changed it to be just literally three. It's a joke on certain people denying reality.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

I think the joke is that there's indeed unequivocally just three, and that one of them still says four despite that fact, contradicting the readers expectations who normally for this format expects the middle thing to be something that changes with perspective (eg. 6 vs 9)

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do you not see four? Your really missing out. I think some guys even started worshiping it. We even started selling a book about four. Once you see it, you can join out super cool club and four based economy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This thread is basically what modern politics feels like

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least there are no centrists in here claiming it's 3.5

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I see seven

Are my eyes fucked up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's obviously nine you pan-arab zionist !

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

People take your joke so personally lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I see the problem, the artist forgot the rest of the sentence:

“Four-sided objects, of which there are three.”

Boom. Done. EZPZ. Do better, artist.

[–] elrik 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rectangular prisms have 6 sides though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

You discovered "political nuance"

[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Is there a way to see this as four? I’m assuming so but legitimately can’t see anything other than three. Is that the joke and I’m overthinking‽ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Zombiepirate 211 points 2 days ago (7 children)

It's a riff on an old meme.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

alternative interpretation: it's only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I agree with you on that.

But alternatively: humans can only see a portion of the whole reality of a given situation, and that specific angle can often be misleading.

[–] tehmics 3 points 1 day ago

Thank you. I've seen the old one before and I knew there was an illusion but I obviously couldn't find it in the OP.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know why there's even a debate over that. The answer is clearly "Yanny."

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 12 points 1 day ago

no, it's blue and gold

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Typical. Both sides think theirs is the only correct answer, and that the other side is just wrong.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But in this case, the other side is wrong!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Do you even hear yourself? You sound just like them. /s

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Instructions unclear, I got my dick caught in the number 8.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›