this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
414 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While Dick Cheney has endorsed Harris, there have been no comments from other senior Republicans from Bush’s era

The MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell this week hit out at George W Bush, the Republican former president, for refusing to weigh in on America’s looming presidential election.

“All any decent person wants him to do is to say, ‘Don’t vote for Donald Trump, and here’s why,’ and he won’t even do that,” O’Donnell told the Fast Politics podcast, of the Republican president who was in office from 2001 to 2009.

Increasingly, Bush – and some other top Republicans from his political era – are looking lonely in their ongoing refusal to take a side in an election in which many have warned that US democracy is under threat from Trump’s open sympathies with autocracy.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 140 points 2 months ago (6 children)

big fucking tough guy when it comes to sending other peoples' kids out to die for a bullshit war based on outright lies

but when it's time to actually take the correct stance on something, he buckles like a lawn chair under the average cod cosplaying maga chud

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was living in NYC before and after 9/11.

The Ground Zero pit stayed undeveloped until 2007 because that's how long it took the money men to decide which insurer would pay for what. George W. never bothered to push them to hurry things, because it was vital that every single penny be accounted for. No problem with starting a war with lies, but money must be guarded to the utmost.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They wanted it to stay an open wound because it let them be more jingo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

He's super busy painting dog pictures.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarkCloud 99 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, Bush and Trump are in direct competition for worst presidents in living memory.

...and they both kinda jimmy with elections. They have a lot in common really so it makes sense he'll be averse to calling out someone whose not that dissimilar to himself.

Also Bush has a generational bonding to the GOP, so there's probably some level of moral compromise in that.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I had Bush ahead of Trump for a long time, but now I have to give it to Donnie.

It's one thing to lie about a war, and a whole differnet level to plan to kill citizens with Covid.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Both were awful. At least you don't fall for the rehabilitation so many in our media have been doing of Bush

[–] Eatspancakes84 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Both are incredibly incompetent. However, I think if Bush had not become president he would have been seen as somebody who is a bit stupid, and easy to influence, but otherwise a pleasant personality. Trump on the other hand was a criminal long before he saw the Oval Office.

[–] AbidanYre 10 points 2 months ago

Bush was terrible, for sure. But it was at least believable that he was doing what he thought was best for the country (Cheney, Rove, and Rumsfeld, not so much). But there is no way you'll ever convince me that Trump cares about anyone or anything other than himself.

[–] PlantJam 7 points 2 months ago

But look, he paints! Just like Bob Ross, so that means we can just forget about all that other stuff, right?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 12 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I had Bush ahead of Trump for a long time

Presidents in the rear view mirror rarely carry the emotional weight of ones at the forefront.

I'd argue Reagan was worse than both of them. We had all the nightmarish bellicose foreign policy of the Bush Administration, the disastrous neglect of health care leading to multiple epidemics from the Trump Era, and dogshit fiscal policy that gave us massive recessions and enormous new debts to accompany our contracting quality of life at the end of his last term.

But who still remembers Iran-Contra or the '87 bank collapse or our deplorable environmental and civil rights policies or the then-extremely-lethal AIDS epidemic?

Buchanan and Andrew Johnson are still largely considered the two worst historical presidents. Truman and Nixon are routinely cited as 20th century flops. But its very difficult to remember how shit America was before most of the folks doing the rankings were even alive. Harder still to have enough of a historical baseline to make an objective measure.

As soon as Trump is done, we're going to be on one about how DeSantis or Cruz or Matt Gaetz is the actual worst person to run for President in our lifetimes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Depends on what "recent" memory is for you. I've got Reagan and Trump neck-and-neck. While Bush should be tried for war crimes, he's nowhere close to as bad as Trump. I'd put Bush and Clinton in the cage match.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Hilarious to me that all the media spent time rehabbing Bush's image and he can't even manage to match Dick fucking Cheney?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 33 points 2 months ago

Cheney is pissed at his daughter losing her family-guaranteed sinecure in Wyoming to a Trumpie, because he's invested in his family's political legacy.

Bush has no real beef with the Trumps and isn't trying to give his daughters a leg up into the next administration.

Totally different set of political incentives to endorse.

[–] 5h17h34d 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Second worst president ever.

He's considered a war criminal in most countries outside of North America and Europe.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Still waiting to see W, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz convicted of war crimes for all the torture they oversaw at those cia black sites, among other things. Absolutely villainous.

[–] finitebanjo 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Bush and Cheney basically fabricated the entire Iraq War and the only people to come out on top were Exxon Fucking Mobil who took majority control of the Iraqi oilfields, and then the executive in charge of the operation, Rex Tillerson, got appointed to the Trump admin.

Thousands dead for greed. America's hands stained in blood and grease for generations.

Still only second worst tho, no disagreement on that.

[–] Ensign_Crab 10 points 2 months ago

Bush and Cheney basically fabricated the entire Iraq War and the only people to come out on top were Exxon Fucking Mobil

Be fair. Halliburton did pretty well for themselves as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kescusay 35 points 2 months ago (13 children)

I mean, who's surprised by this? Dubya was always a dumbass, and essentially the beta version of Trump.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

W was always a tool, a blank slate for his owners to use. The guy has no thoughts of his own so I'm not surprised.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He may not have been a genius mastermind but he's smart enough not to be absolved of the evils he committed. Blank slate is a juuuuust a bit too far for me

Just saying

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] NoSpiritAnimal 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why did anyone ever think he was any good? The folksy paintings? The aw-shucks friendship with Michelle Obama?

This dipshit has the blood of millions on his hands. He gave us Alito. He destroyed as much of the administrative state as he could. His CIA daddy stole his election.

Can you imagine our world today if Gore had gotten in?

Fuck Cheney too, he only cares because Trump was mean to his shithead daughter.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Can you imagine our world today if Gore had gotten in?

It's not very well-remembered today that Clinton's administration ended with a budget surplus of hundreds of billions of dollars or that Gore was by far the most prominent voice in the world sounding the alarm about global warming. With a Gore victory we could have been debt-free as a nation by now and actually taking significant steps towards ending our dependency on fossil fuels; instead the debt is $35 fucking trillion dollars (which is so enormous it sounds like a joke) and the only reason this isn't a bigger problem is that we're cooking ourselves off the planet anyway and no amount of debt is going to matter.

Somewhat tangential, but "global warming" was always a weak formulation of the problem and "climate change" even more so. I prefer "anthropogenic runaway global heating" which more accurately frames the actual problem and has the handy acronym ARGH.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NegativeInf 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Bushes are morally bankrupt anyways. Two war criminals and one of them, Laura, killed her friend in a car accident where she ran a stop sign.

[–] Thrillhouse 27 points 2 months ago

I wonder if this is because W benefitted from the same ratfuckery that Trump uses (Roger Stone, Brooks Bros Riot, etc.)

[–] WhyFlip 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Choose a side you fucking coward, Bush.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

I've never seen a Bush miss an opportunity to be on the wrong side of history.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He wants Republicans policies but not Trump. He's stuck like a lot of other people. Unfortunately, most of those people will hold their noses and vote for Trump and hope for the best. That's the two-party system for ya.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Trump is the only chance gwb has of someone else having more war crimes than him; making him look less evil.

These are Republicans, they only ever serve their own best interests.

[–] aluminium 14 points 2 months ago

Now watch that drive

[–] NineMileTower 13 points 2 months ago

Oh, now everyone is surprised when he acts like a piece of shit? My good friend growing up died in Iraq in 2008. For what?

[–] nemonic187 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lol. Why are we still pretending to give a shit about W?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its Bush, that war criminal can go to hell

[–] BradleyUffner 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, but it would be nice if he took Trump with him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SassyRamen 10 points 2 months ago

He's a war criminal at large who is running from the Hague, he's obviously going to be on the bad guys side.

[–] Ensign_Crab 9 points 2 months ago

Centrists are so disappointed that senpai didn't notice them.

[–] Bonesince1997 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aww, he's just a painter with a soft spot for traitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Notserious 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t he start the stacking the supreme court? Could have been his dad. Jr was just stupider.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 8 points 2 months ago

To Bush, being morally indefensible is a plus.

[–] cybersandwich 7 points 2 months ago

Former presidents dont typically get involved in presidential politics(especially of their own party ) after they leave.

They'll typically stump for candidates in their own party if they were a popular former president.

You could argue that his lack of involvement with Trump's campaign is pretty telling.

[–] LEDZeppelin 7 points 2 months ago

Morally indefensible but thank the Lord we don’t have any morals to worry about

load more comments
view more: next ›