this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
529 points (98.7% liked)

Space

8760 readers
270 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yokozuna 93 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Turns out rocks are rocks. (I'm a geologist I an I approve of this message)

[–] hakunawazo 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)


Interesting that Dean Norris was on Mars and has a special interest in ~~rocks~~ minerals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Hey you show some got dang respect. He knew it was an ugly planet, a bug planet, and he did something about it. No more bugs on Mars. You're welcome.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those particular rocks seem to be sandstone, though... which would pretty much be proof of liquid water having existed at some point.

Rocks are rocks, sure... but rocks tell stories, and these ones are telling a story that, while common and somewhat uninteresting on Earth, is quite interesting indeed when told on Mars.

[–] Yokozuna 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You are totally right. I was going to make a big post about how they actually formed but I deleted it halfway through. These rocks are definitely significant in that the same processes on earth happen on Mars so we can infer how they were deposited and formed. Hence my shitty first comment, rocks are rocks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Aren't the layers in the rock showing that water was definitely present on Mars, and that they're formed by sediment being deposited and forming into sedementary rock over time?

[–] j4k3 16 points 2 months ago

I could be wrong, but I don't think so in this case. Water would likely create more variation in banding where some groupings of layers is present and distinct. What I see in the differences at higher levels appears to be from exposure to wind and solar temperature fluctuations due to exposure. It looks too linear from top to bottom. With water I expect those more distinct sections of banding like you see on the Earth pic side. Maybe there was a lot more or less rain for a time due to a mountain range that came and went, or a local sea or large water basin. Those layers are deep time and more like the slow accumulation of an average dust before wind patterns shift significantly or some event shifts the composition like exposure of a different large rock unit to winds regionally. It is hard for humans to grasp deep time like this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I’m not a geologist but I’ve read up on it a fair bit.

This Mars photo appears to be sandstone.

On earth sandstone is usually associated with ancient rivers, lake shores, and sea shores. But also sand dune fields.

The thing with sandstone though, is it’s not just sand. Rather, it’s sand plus time plus pressure plus cementation.

Now, the time part is obvious. What’s sandstone now was sand a long ass time ago (usually).

Pressure? That’s a little harder to understand for me here. Has mars ever had tectonic stuff going on to bury it (and hence have pressure applied), followed by erosion and uplift? Or am I incorrect and pressure is not a necessary condition? Maybe sandstone without pressure is a thing it’s just weaker and/or less dense? Maybe layers of volcanic basalt or something could have a similar effect? I don’t know and would love to have someone more knowledgeable fill this part out.

Cementation? This part, I’m nearly certain, REQUIRES water. On earth anyway, this happens when ground water absorbs chemicals from other rock/stuff (for example carbonates from sea shells, but there’s lots of other chemicals that can do this), then flows through the beds of buried sand, and some of those chemicals are deposited along with magical chemistry stuff happening, and your sand becomes sand stone.

So I don’t 100% know that the short answer to your question is β€œyes”, but I’m leaning towards a solid β€œyeah, probably, but I’m not a real geologist and Mars isn’t a real Earth so I dunno”.

[–] cynar 14 points 2 months ago

Apparently, sandstone takes FAR less time to form than most people think. Apparently, some sandstone deposits have been found with roman artefacts inside. They were normal sand at the time and turned to sandstone since then.

Basically, it would take far less time than you would think to form sandstone on Mars. It's still proof of liquid water, but the lower end of the time estimate can be FAR shorter than you first think.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Yup!

Sediment gathers at the bottom of a lake or sea. Builds up deeper and deeper layers. Each layer is formed by a sediment deposition event. Each layer you go down is going further into the past of that former water body.

Because sedimentary rock requires standing bodies of liquid to form, they are only found on Earth and Mars (and maybe Dragonfly will find sedimentary deposits on Titan which would be very different in chemistry).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Think so. That's what I came here to ask

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I came to ask which picture is which then noticed the blue sky duh πŸ˜‚

[–] braindefragger 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

OMG I'm being leftright-shamed

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] ByteMe 6 points 2 months ago

It's just the ray tracing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 6 points 2 months ago

Looking for a big rock

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 1 month ago

I've been to the Vasquez Rocks where that was shot. It's right by a freeway that definitely also existed in the 60s. They had to use some very creative camera work in terms of where they pointed it. It's kind of impressive.

[–] Klear 4 points 2 months ago

They're gorn.

[–] FlyingSquid 19 points 1 month ago

Looks like a nice day on Mars. Apart from it being -70C out.

[–] Donjuanme 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Those clouds are doing a lot of talking in the picture on the right

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If only he would tell us why he had to hide away, for so long :(

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Where did we go wrong?

[–] bandwidthcrisis 10 points 2 months ago

Mars has blue sunsets though.

[–] Death_Equity 11 points 2 months ago

Aeolian erosion do be like that though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mmmm that's some good choss! Do you happen to know where the photo on the right was taken? My geoguessr brain wants to put a pin on Kanab, Utah

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe it's the Atacama desert in Chile, according to a reverse image search.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Woah, cool, I never would have guessed! I should have thought to use reverse image search, haha. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont know what camera they used but that zoom is crazy

[–] glitch1985 9 points 1 month ago

Captured on my Samsung Galaxy s22

[–] forrcaho 11 points 2 months ago

If you find this interesting, you would probably enjoy the Mars Guy youtube channel. Weekly updates on the latest rovings of Perseverance.

[–] GladiusB 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mars looks like Southern California in Star Trek in the 60s.

[–] frigidaphelion 5 points 1 month ago

Says a lot for how much they were able to accomplish thematically with environments like that. Iconic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

i wonder if humanoid aliens would be a common thing throughout the universe

like a mass effect sorta thing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i was thinking more on the convergent evolution side, since the worlds seem to be similar? but panspermia is a cool concept too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it's gonna be convergent evolution, all the aliens are probably crab people

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

crab people crab people

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί