this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
124 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43866 readers
1278 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Getting people to pay for digital media in the era of mass piracy (Spotify, Deezer, Netflix)

Starting a taxi company by ~~ignoring~~ frauding all the regulation related to taxi operation, ( Uber)

Tons of pseudo science like energy therapy which are not much different from straight up witchcraft.

A thought also for real estate developer who buy land in high-flood-risk area, and still manage to sell the houses, these ones also should be in jail

[–] 9point6 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The first one is pretty much down to, as Gabe Newell puts it, "piracy is a service problem". Spotify came along and (initially) provided a much better service compared to pirating your music at the time. Once they created the market segment, competitors started their own streaming subscriptions. I'd also say the Google music "upload 50,000 tracks for free" got a lot of former pirates to jump.

Now the services are going through the same enshittification that most popular online services seem to be going through, we can see piracy increasing again. Someone will notice and fill the gap in providing a good service again at some point and the pendulum will swing once more

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dasnap 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Starting a taxi company by ignoring frauding all the regulation related to taxi operation, ( Uber)

TBF people also enjoyed parts of it that aren't regulation related, such as upfront cost calculation. Scamming customers is harder and even in those events, it's possible to get refunds.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah even in countries where Uber only works with normal taxi drivers, it's still much better than getting a cab from the street. It may have started with fraud but these apps actually provide a needed service.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With Uber, they started with ride sharing and slowly nudged its way towards being a car-for-hire business. The reason it worked was because no one really liked taxis and didn't want to defend that monopoly.

Today, cities are trying to regulate places like Airbnb to reduce their presence in major cities, but the only real hate towards Uber and Lyft has more to deal with employee pay.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The difference is that Uber's model of using an app to show you the route, give driver feedback, be able to report problems and monitor and track the driver, etc. is actually a huge improvement to both rider safety and experience compared to calling a cab company and then waiting who knows how long for someone to show up and hopefully bring you where you want to go.

Not saying that their model of gig workers, or dodging up front training is good, but they legitimately offered up a fundamentally better taxi experience than anything that came before, which I think encouraged regulators to really drag their feet on looking into them.

[–] Carighan 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah yeah, lots of pseudo-medicine falls into it.

Of course water has memory.

Of couse physically abusing your kid is healthy for it.

Of course this quartz will help you.

And then you actually strike gold with this shit and years later a well-known actress is selling candles that smell like her minge. Unbelievable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Running a conservative podcast that was more than 90% funded by RT while proclaiming a deep patriotism.

[–] weeeeum 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Netflix killing password sharing despite how easy piracy is. Massive increase in subscriptions

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Piracy is not as nice for average people. It requires effort many won't want to put in to discover what they want (and not in a shitty quality), and then managing and accessing that which you found takes a lot of effort as well to set up in a manner as easily accessed as a Netflix app.

Most people can't/won't bother wasting their time and effort. They'll just pay for a service for the convenience. And before people interject with their anecdotes, convenience is subjective.

[–] Whelks_chance 8 points 1 month ago

Honestly in my younger years I had the time to hunt around for the right streams, rips, subtitle files etc, but it does take time and effort. For the price of a few sandwiches or a handful of coffees I don't have to spend the time doing that anymore.

What's annoying is that it's not a single subscription anymore, it's 4-5 subscriptions which really adds up over the month.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Younger people don't know how to use computers...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Keep 'em dumb.

I brought an DSLR to my office which caught the attention of some of my younger peers. They complained that the screen was not working. I was like "What did you guys do in 2 min? How did you mess it up?"

Then they said "no no, the touch screen isn't working". I'm like "this isn't a touch screen device. You have to press buttons". They were mildly annoyed by that. I suspect this is the fault of iPhones and Android.

Dumb down technology as much as possible but make people dependent on your ecosystem. Don't let users repair it. Keep it closed-source. No one-time-fee. Everything should be a subscription.

[–] TehBamski 12 points 1 month ago

I suspected Netflix to lose sub counts for two years after they enacted their 'No Account Sharing (outside the household).' policy. But it seems that they have been able to bounce back quite quickly, compared to my guess.

[–] kometes 54 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Someone once made a mountain of cash selling pet rocks.

[–] davidgro 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have an official USB pet rock I got from a thinkgeek back in the day. Has a little box with air holes and everything.

Exactly as functional as the original pet rock, but has a short USB cable attached.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] it_depends_man 49 points 1 month ago (12 children)

All the ones where the idea was to "just start something, grow grow grow, then figure out monetization later" is wild to me.

E.g. reddit. It worked. CEO is rich, site is still online. Somehow they got investors probably, presumably.

I get not having profit. I get not having income, if it's in some prototype phase. But having no plan or idea whatsoever for how to monetize and still getting VC? Wild.

[–] TehBamski 8 points 1 month ago

I get not having profit. I get not having income, if it’s in some prototype phase. But having no plan or idea whatsoever for how to monetize and still getting VC? Wild.

It's called "growth-first" or "growth-at-all-costs" strategy. I don't recall what video I was watching when I learned it, but it's a dying strategy for business now (IIRC). It had its rise in popularity in the late 2000s to about 2018. Think Netflix, WeWork, Uber, etc. These are huge businesses to prop up, so they (literally) bank on the idea that with a huge user base, they can sooner or later, make a profit to make it worth all of the risk.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Taking off the pedals and training wheels of bikes and selling them to kids.

Wish I thought of that

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For real. I've seen kids years younger than when I started pedaling scurrying around on these, and it instantly clicked why it's a much better way to learn to stay upright on two wheels.

I wish my first bike had been something like that. Training wheels stop a bike from leaning into turns, so they don't teach you anything about what it is like to ride without them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

When I was learning to ride, my dad bent mt training wheels up so the bike would still turn and the wheels would only touch if you started to fall over a fair way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Strider wasn't the first to come up with balance bikes for kids specifically, they have been around for decades and balance bikes themselves, for a few hundred years.

[–] QuarterSwede 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Balance bikes were the OG bicycle so they have it backwards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Fwiw these days balance bikes are considered better than training wheels for people learning to ride. Training wheels are ok if you actually need to go somewhere accompanied by an adult on a bike, but they’re terrible for learning. They don’t teach you how to steer or balance properly; a balance bike does. In fact, training wheels can teach bad habits that are difficult to unlearn.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

The original SMS version of Twitter.

Later, the name hashtags, in American English this symbol #️⃣ was ~~always~~ best known as the pound key. It was also known as an Octothorpe.

Actually I still don't understand why anyone wants to use Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Not always, it was an octothorpe before phones

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The software company I work for is killing all legacy on-prem software in 2025 and replacing it with a modular AWS based system of single-page websites. Many customers are old-school and hesitant about anything cloud-related, but it worked out beautifully so far. The shutdown hasn't happened yet tho, so we'll see how many lawsuits roll in when it does lol

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hey, as the saying goes, nobody was ever fired for running up an astronomical AWS bill.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

I’ve seen the exact opposite happen a couple of times: β€œHow the fuck did you not realise you were spending 70 grand in a month?!”

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Food delivery.

I never imagined a delivery service for restaurants with drive-thru would take off .

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I kinda get it, if you want takeout food and you can't or won't drive it could be convenient. But it's just so expensive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I realised that it was my bias as car owner.

A good lesson about how all can have blind spots.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Linktree. It's just links on a page. How do you get people to pay a monthly subscription for that?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Folks literally have no conept anymore that you can just slap HTML on a page. & with the advent of needing TLS, it starts to become more technical than a lot of folks want to bother learning & maintain versus the days of raw FTP uploads.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] QuarterSwede 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Roblox. If you were there in the beginning then you know how empty it was. Now, that’s mostly what my son plays to what just make the most money/things? I don’t get it myself (I’m old, lol).

[–] TehBamski 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They knew what they were doing. They knew that Minecraft needed a strong competitor in the video game market, and bet big on the 'long game.'

Noticing that you are a parent of a person who plays Roblox, I feel obligated to share two investigative videos about Roblox Corporation practices or lack thereof, the exploitive practices they have to paying third-party in-game content "developers" (that are often kids/tweens/teens), and the issues Roblox have had with pedophiles/adults grooming young people/kidnappings.

The following videos are from People Make Games on Youtube.

Investigation: How Roblox Is Exploiting Young Game Developers

Roblox Pressured Us to Delete Our Video. So We Dug Deeper.

[Just so we are clear, I am not telling you how to parent your son or person. I am just informing you to the best of my ability, about the issues that have arisen on and off Roblox.]

[–] QuarterSwede 5 points 1 month ago

Appreciate the heads up. Will watch.

[–] multifariace 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Buying rights to provide telecom service to an area and not actually providing service.

[–] TehBamski 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wait that's a thing? In TV broadcasting?

I've heard of how Comcast Did New York state dirty many years ago. IIRC, they walked away with nearly half a billion dollars, which I believe was about 2/3 of all the money the state had given them to connect small towns and clusters of rural communities to DSL internet.>

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Making a social network where people can send pictures to each other, then selling it to a big corporation for billions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Buying massive amounts of primetime commercial time to sell useless products by screaming their name over and over in the ad.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I never thought WeWork would succeed. Reasons:

  • the library was free to work at
  • they leased the property and then subleased it after rebuilding the inside
  • they offered free drinks, snacks, some places had gyms and showers too.
  • expanded very quickly and in LA had locations within a block of another.

They are still around. It's still around the same price to rent a desk for the day. But Regus, the actual property owner has their own desk rental service too.

[–] QuarterSwede 7 points 1 month ago

Makes sense to me. Open office designs SUCK. I share an office with 2 other people and I’m much, much more productive in my home office with 3 kids in the house because I can shut my door, be alone with my thoughts, and be productive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

there was this online bookshop that started selling, like, not books. and then they started selling their excess computer capacity?? and now they have rockets. from a book store. wtf.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί