this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
308 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19142 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If any voters had forgotten that Donald J. Trump was accused by multiple women of sexual misconduct, he spent roughly 45 minutes reminding them on Friday, eight weeks before Election Day.

At a lectern in the lobby of Trump Tower, Mr. Trump, flanked by seven of his lawyers, laid out years-old allegations from the women in detail as he denied that they were telling the truth. He had just attended a federal appeals court hearing related to a civil case in which he was found liable of sexually abusing and defaming a New York writer, E. Jean Carroll, decades earlier. Mr. Trump was not required to attend the hearing, but decided he wanted to.

When the hearing was over, he went to his eponymous building for what the Republican presidential nominee’s campaign called a “press conference.” But he ended it without taking questions, and the session — during which Mr. Trump criticized his rival, Vice President Kamala Harris, for avoiding reporters — was more like a venting exercise over his frustrations about his legal travails.

MBFC
Archive

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person 65 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Fucking wild. Absolutely demented. Hilarious watching him trash his own lawyer who was standing right next to him though.

These people that work with him and expect anything but to absolutely get shit on should be ashamed of themselves. First, for working with a wannabe fascist dictator and all around POS. Second, for debasing themselves and allowing him to insult them all so readily, frequently, and publicly.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves,” he told reporters. “Thank you very much everybody.”

Jesus Christ who ends a speech that way, let alone a presidential nominee. The press deserves all the shit they get for giving him the attention he craves.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I like the term I first read today, "sanewashing."

Journalistic neutrality standards are good things when reporting on ambiguity, but you can't give equal deference to both delusional and sane individuals.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

*actual fascist, wannabe dictator

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Any strategist who suggested this event needs to quit their job and rethink their life. Of course I am kidding, Trump’s strategists are awful and he won’t listen to them anyway. What an absolutely bonkers own goal.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

Frankly — I know you’re going to say it’s a terrible thing to say — but it couldn’t have happened, it didn’t happen, and she would not have been the chosen one

he literally uses half the narcissists prayer in one sentence

[–] fluxion 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is Trump trying to get sued for defamation again?

[–] snausagesinablanket 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter because he was never made to pay for the first one yet.

[–] mipadaitu 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was an official act as part of his presidency, he should be immune.

[–] jaybone 8 points 1 month ago

Also he can time travel to perform official acts of sexual assault.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With everything that has been going on with Trump, it's pretty wild to me that any woman would even consider voting for this guy.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any woman who eagerly votes for him in this election is: a) an idiot, b) lives in an impenetrable bubble of right wing media, or c) utterly loathes themselves. Though I guess those options aren't mutually exclusive.

[–] Furedadmins 3 points 1 month ago

Or is rich and selfish although those are usually one and the same.

[–] Etterra 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump's ego: If there's one thing women love, it's being insulted for having an opinion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

And if any of you women don't understand why I'm happy to sit down and explain it to you. I booked the conference room for two hours and have an in depth power point presentation on why you feel like you do - and I'll use really small words since I know you're easily confused. /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing gets women to support you quite like shouting at them for not supporting you

[–] FordBeeblebrox 3 points 1 month ago

Please clap

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

So the racist rapist with dementia that is really weird is upset he's losing the women vote to a women? This guy really doesn't have much of a brain left.

[–] SulaymanF 6 points 1 month ago

How is he still nearly tied with all of his idiocy on display?

[–] JeeBaiChow 6 points 1 month ago

That'll show em!

/s