this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
530 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60012 readers
2565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In June, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) signed an acquisition plan for a 5-year, nearly $5.3 million contract for a controversial surveillance tool called Tangles from tech firm PenLink, according to records obtained by the Texas Observer through a public information request. The deal is nearly twice as large as the company’s $2.7 million two-year contract with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Tangles is an artificial intelligence-powered web platform that scrapes information from the open, deep, and dark web. Tangles’ premier add-on feature, WebLoc, is controversial among digital privacy advocates. Any client who purchases access to WebLoc can track different mobile devices’ movements in a specific, virtual area selected by the user, through a capability called “geofencing.” Users of software like Tangles can do this without a search warrant or subpoena. (In a high-profile ruling, the Fifth Circuit recently held that police cannot compel companies like Google to hand over data obtained through geofencing.) Device-tracking services rely on location pings and other personal data pulled from smartphones, usually via in-app advertisers. Surveillance tech companies then buy this information from data brokers and sell access to it as part of their products.

WebLoc can even be used to access a device’s mobile ad ID, a string of numbers and letters that acts as a unique identifier for mobile devices in the ad marketing ecosystem, according to a US Office of Naval Intelligence procurement notice.

Wolfie Christl, a public interest researcher and digital rights activist based in Vienna, Austria, argues that data collected for a specific purpose, such as navigation or dating apps, should not be used by different parties for unrelated reasons. “It’s a disaster,” Christl told the Observer. “It’s the largest possible imaginable decontextualization of data. … This cannot be how our future digital society looks like.”

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240827115133/https://www.texasobserver.org/texas-dps-surveillance-tangle-cobwebs/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qooqie 98 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This is something that was going to happen eventually it’s just kind of ironic that it’s a deep red state going for government surveillance like this

[–] [email protected] 103 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nothing says "small government" and "freedom" quite like mass surveillance.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

They need mass surveillance to put down the protests for ~~freedom~~ ... errr to protect freedom (~~white people freedom~~ rich white people freedom).

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Every accusation is a confession. Always.

[–] SlopppyEngineer 13 points 3 months ago

Red states have more poor, desperate people with guns so better keep them from getting uppity.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Totally on brand really. Republicans want to eliminate white collar crime (by never prosecuting it) and catch 110% of blue collar crimes.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Should gather Abbott's device id and his families, and post all of their data in a constant stream of location, search results, and such. Soon as his and his families families data is being posted they'll rethink it as a privacy issue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But doxing is illegal 🤪

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bacano 74 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ahh yes, the freedom loving state. Texas. That's right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Big brother in action. Got to keep those women in line. /s

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 12 points 3 months ago

I know what you mean by /s but seriously that's gotta be one of the drivers behind this decision. If Republicans control the state after the next gubernatorial election I could totally see a new law to punish the patient of a abortion (it just targets doctors for now).

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago

Remember that one time in Batman where they built a mass surveillance program using phones and decided it was so morally objectionable they immediately destroyed it after?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

I'm fairly in tune with my privacy but didn't even know about this one. I assumed I had disabled all this when I setup my phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ATDA 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Will they finally see or hear me say

FUCK GREG ABBOTT

I hope they can, I'm doing it as hard as I can ...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is there anyway we can open source this technology? I'd love to surveil police and politician phones if possible.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Government know people love to keep track of police and politicians so they are making it illegal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_security_law

[–] TropicalDingdong 32 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Weird ass fcking state. Can we pawn this one off to Mexico?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Make sure to support the government in the next elections so they can spend more public money on "security"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

And they'll "catch" just enough "criminals" (read: non-white people) to give Fox News some metrics they can blow out of proportion for the gullible, rural rubes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

nobody has ever said "remember that good thing that came out of texas".

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it's not food, then yeah, we're setting all the wrong precedents.

[–] BeardedBlaze 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Y'all aren't exactly known for great food either lol

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

As a Texan who has no pride in their state at all and is actively making plans to move to a different state, I strongly disagree.

[–] gAlienLifeform 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not a Texan but I also disagree about this. Also, Austin has produced some amazing music over the years (for example, random Austin band I've been in love with recently is Being Dead).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] doodledup 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Isn't the US already a surveillance country?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes 16 points 3 months ago

Small government.

[–] Snapz 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Freedom rations are going up this week from 10 to 8!

[–] braindefragger 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Texas reeks ~~of freedom~~

ftfy

[–] rottingleaf 10 points 3 months ago

So they only needed to say that all this shit is completely depersonalized and so on for the time being, until they did this like thieves they are.

Typical.

It's also really funny when people say "oh but it's a democratic country with institutions and rule of law doing this, so it's fine", because this is how a country stops being that. Well, people don't say this about anything in USA, they usually say this about the EU.

This is why we the humanity can't have nice things.

Because when we build a nice thing, some jerks decide that we can break it and still have it, because we "already have it". Completely illogical, but all proponents of government control against freedom and rules-based order against humanism are like that.

[–] 800XL 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Don't worry, it's AI. It won't work properly.

[–] glnpf148 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This might be good for the false negatives but not for the false positives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›