this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
226 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18879 readers
3906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Once a court decides that you're not guilty, the answer should be "you're free to go" and for those who have been incarcerated for a significant amount of time, "here's how we're going to support your re-entry into society." Keeping the imprisoned is completely antithetical to any reasonable sense of justice.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ccunning 13 points 1 month ago

It’s fucking weird

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Innocent people should be kept in jail of couse weirdo.

[–] SuckMyWang 5 points 1 month ago

Weird losers

[–] hperrin 31 points 1 month ago

So republicans want innocent people locked up and guilty people in the White House. How is this a serious political party?

[–] just_another_person 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Archer 7 points 1 month ago

Honestly surprised Mississippi didn’t swoop in with a plan to start The Purge

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I was going to guess Louisiana.

[–] RizzRustbolt 1 points 1 month ago

I'd take offense at that, but I've seen our candidates for Governor.

[–] worldwidewave 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was not the first time that Mr. Bailey had sought to upend an exoneration, and his intervention in the Dunn case came at a critical point in his tenure, with the Missouri primary election scheduled for Tuesday. Mr. Bailey, who took office 17 months ago to fill out his predecessor’s term, is trying to fend off a formidable challenger as he seeks a full four-year term as the state’s top law enforcement officer.

Weeks before trying to block Mr. Dunn’s release, Mr. Bailey moved to keep Sandra Hemme locked up after a judge ruled that she was innocent. Ms. Hemme, who had been in prison for 43 years, spent another month behind bars before the state’s highest court stepped in and ordered her release.

And in June, Mr. Bailey tried unsuccessfully to quash a motion by the St. Louis County prosecutor to exonerate Marcellus Williams, who was convicted of the 1998 murder of a local journalist and faces execution in September.

It’s political imprisonment, and it’s fucking disgusting.

[–] APassenger 6 points 1 month ago

He needs to be imprisoned. Seems fair enough.

[–] LavenderDay3544 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He should be disbarred at the least.

[–] linearchaos 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Disbarred, dismembered, any of the disses are probably being just fine

[–] lemmyseikai 3 points 1 month ago

Eh, he's already disimpassioned. We need to pick more radical disses.

[–] RizzRustbolt 2 points 1 month ago

He'll most likely lose his job tomorrow.

[–] cabron_offsets 13 points 1 month ago

Republicans, ladies and gentlemen. Unencumbered by morals, empathy, or virtues of any sort.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This guy should be thrown in jail for one (1) year for every one (1) hour these innocent people are held.

[–] TrickDacy 1 points 1 month ago

BoTh SiDeS tHo!! UnIpArTY ANd StUfF