this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
46 points (63.9% liked)

politics

18830 readers
5533 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

At least one donor who attended the event and listened to Mr. Schiff’s remarks said he left dejected, believing that Mr. Biden’s chances of winning were now slim and that they should concentrate giving their time and money to downballot candidates in the hopes of salvaging something for the party.

I wonder how many prospective/Democrat candidates the party starved for funding and soundbytes that actually dropped out or stepped aside?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

in the hopes of salvaging something for the party.

one would hope that salvaging something for the fucking country is what should be first on their minds.

i understand the sentence is second party reinterpretation, but it is still funny. or sad. or something.

[–] Cosmonauticus 12 points 1 month ago

This is legit a leopards ate my face moment for Democrats. We need a new candidate!! Like who? One of those guys we told to get the fuck out of the way!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Frankly, I'd kill for the Dems to pour money and resources into down ballot races.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There go the Democrats, shooting themselves in the foot again.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's only fair since the Republicans got to shoot themselves in the ear

[–] frog_brawler 3 points 1 month ago

Crooks on crooks crimes have always been the Republican way.

[–] Buffalox 10 points 1 month ago

No the Republicans shot themselves in the foot, and the Democrats took it as a challenge, and shot themselves in the head.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In this thread: people who don't know how poorly this went every other time they switched.

[–] gAlienLifeform 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Correlation isn't causation, the switches happened because they were doing poorly

[–] Wogi 9 points 1 month ago

One time the switch happened because the popular candidate was assassinated.

One time it was partially because of, and partially the cause of the Civil War. (Contest only resolved after Southern delegates walked out)

One time it was because neither candidate could get the support of the KKK. No that's not a joke.

And another time it was because of the civil rights act. The guy who ended up causing the contest really, really hated it.

In every single case, the party that had a contested convention lost the election. Generally by a pretty wide margin.

[–] mojofrododojo 5 points 1 month ago (22 children)

do they know we automatically lose Nevada, Georgia and Wisconsin if we lose Biden/Harris?

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-joe-biden-presidential-race-replacing-biden-georgia-nevada-wisconsin-1919531

I can't fathom the circular firing squad mentality at work here.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Suavevillain 17 points 1 month ago (11 children)

This isn't like other elections in the past. But at the same time there is no clear full proof solution for another person to take the wheels. They should do whatever it takes to make sure Trump and Trumpism is defeated long term.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Mr. Schiff, who has been among Mr. Trump’s most outspoken critics, said at the fund-raiser that Mr. Biden and his campaign staff had been generally unwilling to engage the views of outside pollsters and political experts and urged them to do so, the people with knowledge of his remarks said.

At least one donor who attended the event and listened to Mr. Schiff’s remarks said he left dejected, believing that Mr. Biden’s chances of winning were now slim and that they should concentrate giving their time and money to downballot candidates in the hopes of salvaging something for the party.

Mr. Biden’s campaign pointed to statements that it and the president’s allies had repeatedly made in recent days that he maintained strong support from members of Congress.

Only a relatively small number have publicly come out against Mr. Biden’s candidacy, the campaign said, noting support from members of groups like the Congressional Black Caucus.

Mr. Schiff rose to national prominence in 2019 as the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee when he led the impeachment hearings against Mr. Trump for withholding aid to Ukraine.

The impeachment proceedings began after an intelligence community official seeking whistle-blower protections told lawmakers about a phone call Mr. Trump had with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine.


The original article contains 678 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›