this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
193 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19101 readers
4132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 138 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Can someone remind me when destroying evidence, whether real or performative, was a plus for someone running for ATTORNEY General.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 4 months ago

Well, when you're ~~virtue~~ corruption signalling for the MAGA nuts is about the only case I can think of.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pander to their audience. Immortal, crooked, and shady human garbage.

[–] Stovetop 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

God I hope they're not immortal.

[–] AbidanYre 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] ChronosTriggerWarning 4 points 4 months ago

Litch McConnell. Moscow Litch..?

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning 2 points 4 months ago

I just heard that Trump's mom is a member of the clan MacLeod from Scotland...

[–] Chee_Koala 40 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Hello, guys? You ok over there??

[–] Feathercrown 42 points 4 months ago
[–] Chainweasel 22 points 4 months ago
[–] PunnyName 18 points 4 months ago

If you have to ask, the answer is "no".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

We would appreciate it if Europe could liberate us from the Nazis this time around. We could really use some godless Scandinavian socialism over here.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 3 points 4 months ago
[–] CptOblivius 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm getting so tired of the Nazis...why are we at this point...why can't we be compassionate and reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

We can't because compassion and reason are antithetical to their plans.

Bob Chipman @the_moviebob

There can be no "unprovoked" violence against a Nazi. The sole aim and focus of their philosophical existence is violence. If you take up that identity, you've already declared violent intent - anything done in response is just varying levels on self-defense.

[–] Eldritch 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Just when you think they can't get worse than jogging Josh Hawley. They always find a way to go lower. I will be excitedly looking forward to voting against this candidate. I just hope Democrats can bother to field anyone that might even be interesting to vote for.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago

NOT investigating Criminals is called LAW AND ORDER!

[–] ATDA 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

...

Is this a marketing thing I need to nail down before some other fuck makes money on it? Surely the following advertising ideas would be terrible right?

Dentist that sells taffy as a teeth whitener?

Fireman that sells fireworks?

Teacher that teachers the Bibl... WHOOPS how did that one slip into a hypothetical?

[–] indomara 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is this timeline?

[–] Delusional 3 points 4 months ago

This timeline is great. Something that, in a normal timeline, would be a complete joke and would make the person extremely embarrassed to the point of never coming out of their home again because everyone knows that they're a complete imbecile.

Where in this timeline, the idiot does it unironically and isn't completely embarrassed by his stupid embarrassing behavior and in fact is proud of it.