this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
445 points (93.4% liked)

News

23608 readers
4069 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 117 points 5 months ago (20 children)

Out of the 151 breast reductions that were performed in 2019 on American minors, 146 (97 percent) were performed on cisgender males.

The thing is, growing up in an evangelical church they don’t want these people getting breast reduction surgery either. they firmly believe that any change to the body is going against God’s will regardless of the physical or mental harm it may cause.

[–] FuglyDuck 85 points 5 months ago (2 children)

pretty sure they're okay with women getting boob implants, though.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Idk, the #1 thing people said behind Dolly Parton's back and held against her was that she had fake tits.

[–] FuglyDuck 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People are awful. If there’s nothing that they can be mean about, they’ll make shit up. I suspect most of that was more because she was rich/famous/influential in her own right rather than being tied to a husband.

(though she’s married. I looked it up outta curiosity. He doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page…

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Dolly's husband has never been a part of her public persona. He's always been in the background and almost everyone has respected his/her choice on the matter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

absolutely true but Dolly Parton did not have to face transphobic harassment and violence

very very very important distinction

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] friend_of_satan 43 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Except male genital mutilation, aka circumcision. (Please don't take this as me saying FGM and MGM are equally bad. FGM is much, much worse.)

[–] Madrigal 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are other forms of MGM too. Fortunately most of them are rare these days. Castration, subincision, penectomy.

And then there’s intersex people. That are routinely subject to “corrective surgery” in infancy. As adults they tend to be firmly of the opinion they should have been left alone and that the surgeries were harmful.

IMO bodily integrity and autonomy is a fundamental human right that should be absolutely respected for every human being.

[–] friend_of_satan 10 points 5 months ago
[–] TheBananaKing 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are five grades of FGM; MGM is equivalent to hoodectomy, which is grade III.

The worst FGM is much, much worse that MGM, but the least-worst FGM is much less-worse than MGM.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

where do you cite this five grade model?

the world health organization is not quite in line with you here (CW, hopefully obvious explicit discussion of mutilation) thanks !

[–] TheBananaKing 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hm, it's been a while since I've been active in this space, I'm quoting from memory. I'll look up some stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 months ago

this should hilight to us the outsized effect transphobia has on discourse.

if we were to believe the line that “we’re just concerned about people getting mutilated” we must naturally expect to see that 97% margin of outrage at breast implants, hair implants, weight management surgery etc. for cis folk.

and we don’t. here and there you might hear an evangelical getting upsetti spaghetti avout Ozempic et al but transphobic talking points dominate, in vast disproportion to actual individual cases.

[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 5 months ago

Although they're usually fine with things like wearing glasses and getting stents. Odd, isn't it?

[–] whostosay 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well except for giant fake titties, God wants those. If we can get those on some minors, I'm pretty sure Republicans would shut the fuck up for decades.

[–] drislands 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My mother is fond of saying "God doesn't make junk". Easily disproven whether or not you believe in a god, but she's a "if I don't like it, it didn't happen" variety of Trump supporter, so I err on the side of changing the subject over arguing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm so sorry you have to deal with that.

There's no way I could continue having a relationship with anyone who is a trump supporter.

[–] drislands 5 points 5 months ago

Thank you. It is really difficult. It's especially hard to find the line. (Un)fortunately for me she's always been unreasonable per se, so I already had her at arm's length before Trump flopped onto the scene.

[–] captainlezbian 13 points 5 months ago

Oh they absolutely do. The alternative is men with breasts. They’ll say they don’t, but when the time comes to accept cis men’s bodies when they fall outside “male” expectations they won’t.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My mother (religious) once told me my tattoos make her sad. There are only two that are visible on a forearm (the third is under my shirt). I told her that they make me feel happy. She’s never brought it up again. But hers is less fervent, still rooted in the same origin.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing that's because the Bible says no tattoos in the same book where it says not to eat pork and shellfish, but Christians only believe the passages in the Pentateuch if they're okay with them.

Bible says no pork, pork is ok.

Bible says not to be gay in the exact same book, being gay is an abomination unto the lord.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Gender affirmation only counts to them if it defies the sex or gender binary. They're completely fine with people modifying their bodies to affirm their masculinity or femininity so long as they were assigned male or female at birth accordingly.

Trans people pursuing medical transition are such a small percentage of the population that cis people getting hormone therapy or affirming surgeries will always dwarf the number of trans people who are. Throw in all of the ways we affirm the gender of cis people, through language and fashion and culture and so on, and it's evident what their gripe is. It's never been about children receiving gender affirmation, merely their conviction that transgender people do not exist or are immoral and evil and shouldn't exist. There's a reason modern transphobia is highly intertwined with fascism. To believe that an entire group of people, based solely on their gender, is immoral and evil is only possible through a lense of dehumanization and conspiracy. Something they are especially good at. We are too few in number and too disparate to counteract the efforts of fascists, who by themselves outnumber us in every way.

[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They may be fine with it, but the laws they are passing are not.

And I won't be shocked if they decide that it's actually a good thing like the anti-IVF stuff that happened as a result of the anti-abortion laws.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You know damn well as soon as some politician needs some work done or their wife does, the laws will be changed to adjust the definition to "affirming a gender other than what was assigned at birth"

In no world does America ban boob jobs or any of the whatever the fuck insecure men get done.

[–] bobzilla 4 points 5 months ago

Easy enough to get around for everyone then. Are you male to female trans? You're not getting a vagina, you're getting a penis reduction.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (11 children)

Why are so many cis males getting breast reduction surgery tho?

Edit I didn't know that many dudes had boobs. Makes sense, thanks :3

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Especially when you can get them enlarged! C’mon fellas. Have fun with it.

Seriously though, I get that this could be terribly embarrassing if you have boobs as a man. I feel bad for kids in gym locker rooms getting teased.

[–] VelvetStorm 33 points 5 months ago

Now, imagine how bad it would be if you were a man with breasts and a vagina and woman's name and you were forced to stay that way. Truly sounds like a nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes you just need some round things in your face, even if they are your own

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snowclone 28 points 5 months ago

Dude, I saw that picture of Elliot Page after he got his breasts removed. He looked HAPPY. Rejuvenated. I want to get rid of mine to. I've never wanted gender affirming care as much as I do now as a cis gender man, these guys are getting it done. It's clearly making them feel better.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because the alternative is a brossiere.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I believe the options were the manssiere or the bro.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

All dudes have boobs. They have nipples and breast tissue. They can lactate (small amounts) and get breast cancer.

This is because, in mammals, the default sex leans towards more female. An XY-chromosome 'male' foetus that doesn't respond to androgens in the womb will not develop male external genitalia, and will probably be assumed to be female on birth.

Sex is not binary, because biology isn't simple. Gender, which is more complex than that, is not, either.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 5 months ago (10 children)

I believe that male lactation, while possible, is rare.

[–] Snowclone 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Rare cam be a deceptive term, with the current population of the human race 'one in a million' is still 8,000 people.

But also, male lactation, other than infants at birth who have a high exposure to their mother's hormones, is always a significant medial concern, so it isn't something that just sometimes happens.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Males are born with breast tissue, hence the fact they can get breast cancer.

One or more hormones (I assume prolactin is involved) are required to activate lactation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Because of dem tiddis fool.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] IzzyScissor 26 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I was wondering when they would start to figure out that maybe it's a bad idea for the government to get between people and their doctors.

[–] MehBlah 19 points 5 months ago

Most will only realize its a bad idea when it affects them. Just like they can only empathize with someone who is experiencing the exact same thing they are.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Easy, they don't see trans folk as "people".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainlezbian 23 points 5 months ago

Well they do vastly outnumber us and have a ton of their own gender based insecurities so it makes sense

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

This is ABSURD! Somebody needs to AMEND these laws to allow little girls to get Breast Implants!

-Republicans that totally aren't Sex Offenders like DRAG QUEENS ARE!

load more comments
view more: next ›