Madrigal

joined 2 years ago
[–] Madrigal 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] Madrigal 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought it was Oracle, the company of “our products are designed for one purpose alone: to tick boxes on RFPs.”

[–] Madrigal 3 points 3 weeks ago

The Y9999.999999871K bug

[–] Madrigal 1 points 3 weeks ago

Then your only challenge will be converting to and from human-friendly formats and cleansing user input. Easy.

[–] Madrigal 5 points 3 weeks ago

I asked ChatGPT for some potential solutions to the Y10K issue. I particularly enjoyed this suggestion:

Plan for Y10K Early: Build flexible and extensible systems now, with modular design to incorporate future changes seamlessly.

[–] Madrigal 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's what happens when James uses the good dining forks to unjam the cupboard door again.

[–] Madrigal 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, that was certainly the peak of human artistic achievement.

[–] Madrigal 59 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

Imagine thinking that’ll be the biggest date-related computing problem for a galactic society.

If you really want to make programmers despair, point out:

  • massive variations in day, month and year lengths on different worlds.
  • some worlds may not have “months” (no moons, or many moons).
  • ambiguous definition of “year” for multi-star systems.
  • days may be longer than years (hello Venus).
  • communication latency across interstellar distances.
  • tine dilation.
[–] Madrigal 16 points 3 weeks ago

Also tells us how frequently we need to issue “reminders”.

[–] Madrigal 4 points 1 month ago

Google isn’t a search engine any more. It stopped being that some years ago.

Now it’s more accurately described as a shitty content feed that can be weakly filtered using key words.

[–] Madrigal 35 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Standard conservative mindset. Swimming against the tide.

They might slow things, but the inevitable progress of technology plus equally inevitable increase in gas prices over time will shift the market to EVs anyway.

view more: next ›