this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
435 points (98.4% liked)

Work Reform

9424 readers
202 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Allonzee 61 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

But they worked so haaaaaard exploiting the labor of thousands of other humans to enrich themselves specifically!

It would be so unfair to punish the success the global owner class created all by themselves that had nothing to do with access to their society's commons like functioning utilities and roads, legal mechanisms for business disputes, and publically educated, pre-literate labor pools to draw and directly profit from but should never have to fund commensurate with the immoral levels of wealth it most certainly didn't facilitate them acquiring!

Wouldn't a just, compassionate society do the only fair thing and just let the worst off human beings and citizens of our respective societies die in the streets horribly of exposure and law enforcement brutality for the crime of not producing value well enough for our beloved job creators?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Allonzee 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If we switched to eating billionaires instead of eating beef for one day that would solve world hunger indefinitely, food for thought

[–] Illuminostro 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a big fan of veal, so eat their children first.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Dark.

Just the way I like my baby meat.

[–] disguy_ovahea 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

You do realize that their money doesn’t go back into the economy when they die, right? They have living wills. It just makes someone else a billionaire. It’s not like you can kill a billionaire and all their money spews out like Sonic the Hedgehog’s rings.

[–] Jerkface 22 points 2 weeks ago

You just keep eating the heirs until it all 'trickles down', you see.

[–] Lennnny 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds to me like it's a well stocked food supply then.

[–] disguy_ovahea 0 points 2 weeks ago

Or it’s a funny thing to write that distracts us from actionable solutions.

[–] RageAgainstTheRich 8 points 2 weeks ago

Don't worry. We'll make it a "Family Dinner" 🤫🔪

[–] taiyang 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure the contingency is eating the inheritors until no one is left. It's billionaires all the way down!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Billionaire day repeats anytime someone crosses over the threshold

[–] some_designer_dude 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You don’t eat them to liberate their money. You eat them to show others of their kind what happens to those who hoard wealth away from the needy.

[–] disguy_ovahea 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And that compels their peers to be charitable to the murderous cannibals how?

[–] Apollo42 4 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps a slight aversion to being the 2nd course.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool. How about 80 to 90%?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The 90% tax rate is the gold standard and we go even further.

[–] disguy_ovahea 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

We’ll be taxing billionaires heavily in the US next year if Biden wins in the fall.

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2169

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

B-b-but Biden hasn't done anything!

[–] disguy_ovahea 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You’re right in this case. He has to wait for Trump’s tax plan to end before his can go into effect. Trump’s tax breaks for the working class ended in 2022, but the breaks for the wealthy don’t expire until 2025. Tax proposals have to meet budget requirements, and someone had to pay for those breaks for the wealthy and corporations.

[–] taiyang 11 points 2 weeks ago

Funny how those dates timed out, almost like they wanted taxes in the working class to go up during a potential democrat presidency. Hmm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

One thing expiring for the middle class is the home office deduction. Up until Trump's 2018 tax changes, W-2 employees could take the deduction, but that changed to contractors only until 2025. Who would have thought that in between those two years, we'd have a pandemic that moved a lot of people into work from home? It's something that a lot of people got swiped away from them and they don't even know it.

[–] Illuminostro 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

He won't. The Heritage Foundation's long game has finally come to fruition. The SCOTUS is bought and paid for. Bribes of politicians are perfectly legal. They've already won. It's all downhill from here. Leave the US while you can. As soon as my Mom dies, which will be very soon, I'm checking out. I've lived 53 years, long enough, and I'm not married, no kids. I won't live in the United Reich of America.

[–] Num10ck 7 points 2 weeks ago

interesting that you think anywhere is safe if the US actually collapses.

[–] lath 11 points 2 weeks ago

If there's one thing I've learned observing bureaucracy in action is that trickle down corruption is very much a thing and whatever theoretical sum is achieved, the end sum reaching where it needs to go is quite often less than half of the initial funds.

When it comes to money, it's dirty all the way down, not just the top.

[–] cultsuperstar 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The government would just put that money into defense spending.

[–] okamiueru 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What a weird defeatist thought. We're already in lala-land with 5% tax added, albeit measly, on the ruling class. So, why not lala all the way to a positive use of it?

[–] cultsuperstar 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe, but the people of the country are not the priority. If we were the priority, Republicans wouldn't constantly try to defund social programs like social security and welfare. The people would have more to help them, corporations would be taxed more and the people (namely the middle and lower classes) would be taxed less. The country doesn't serve us, like it should. The country serves the corporations and military.

[–] _sideffect 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

None of that will go to people in poverty, that's the problem

[–] Allonzee 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I hear you, and it's tragic that the fight doesn't end with taxation but with its application and every politician wants to give it to their affluent bribers in some form.

That said, capital at the level of the owners is an expression of power, power to keep the world rigged, buy governments/regulators, protect monopolies, etc.

If that money was somehow (im not holding by breath) taxed/confiscated from the world's immoral owner class, transferred into paper currency and incinerated, it would still be a good day because the power dynamic between them the 10s of thousands of sociopath owner families, and us the billions, would still be measurably improved.

[–] Etterra 6 points 2 weeks ago

Good luck with it. You may need to use shotguns. The rich bastards in power will never agree to party with any money that they aren't literally forced to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

The first article linked in this article is the original, and better.

[–] iAvicenna 2 points 2 weeks ago

eh they will just open more charities and funnel their wealth there and still use their money to push agendas

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

And then some tax haven country will offer a tiny tax of 0.01% on a super specific kind of "investment", just to ensure its local lawyers and accountants stay employed by offering "investment consultancy" services to the rich.

[–] Tronn4 -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tax on the wealthy sounds good but the money would never trickle down to the people who need it. It'll find it's way to the coffers of people in power and even back to the same pockets from which it came from. We'd have to establish a completely open system showing what goes in and where it goes to and proper accountability. No contractor waste. This system is unheard of and thus wouldn't happen

[–] Badeendje 5 points 2 weeks ago

You mean government?