this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
663 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59667 readers
3766 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 162 points 5 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 110 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Will use 4x as much electricity though, ugh.

https://www.cleanenergyresourceteams.org/your-old-refrigerator-energy-hog

Anyone know of any refrigerators today that are as durable as older ones and have today's efficiencies, but without the smart features and other junk?

Average refrigerator today still lasts 13 years though, and while they're made cheaply they also are cheaper (at least as a portion percentage of the average paycheck).

https://reviewed.usatoday.com/dishwashers/features/ask-the-experts-why-dont-new-home-appliances-last

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sub Zero, Thermador... High end refrigerators, just look at the price, we decided to forget the idea because of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

I've heard that in the US fridges are generally different, with stuff like active fans and nonsense like that. Is that true?

Because every fridge I've seen in Europe is mechanically extremely basic and I've literally never seen or even heard of one breaking. In my experience fridges are one of the only things that have remained phenomenally simple in design and extremely unlikely to break.

If someone told me their fridge broke, I'd genuinely assume they were lying. That's how reliable they are.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well there are evaporator fans in modern refrigerators in the US. They serve an important role though helping with defrosting, improving cooling efficiency, and evenness of cooling throughout the fridge.

https://refrigeratorguide.net/maximize-cooling-efficiency-best-refrigerator-evaporator/

Usually only very small refrigerators are without them now.

It is another point of failure though, but should be pretty easily repairable. I mean it'll still be able to cool without the fan, but it'll be running much more to try and compensate and keep things cool though.

If you know the YouTube channel technology connections, here's a fun video of him messing around with a fanless style refrigerator:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=8PTjPzw9VhY

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

Every LG and Samsung major appliance I've had has broken within 5 years.

Refrigerators, washing machines, and dryers.

Prior, I only ever had 80s era American tank energy hogs. Switched back to American brands in the last few years, so too soon to tell if they'll work out better...

Here's to hoping.

Oh, and having dealt with LG warranty for both electronics and major appliances, I'll never buy another LG product that isn't a monitor.

LG monitors are the only higher end LG product's I've owned that have survived well past the warranty date.

[–] barsquid 35 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I think Samsung is generally considered trash now. I certainly will never buy any of their "smart" objects either, especially not an ad-ridden TV.

[–] orclev 23 points 5 months ago

I can confirm Samsung appliances are complete trash. Every single one I've owned has either died or had a non-replaceable part fail within a couple years. We had a Samsung fridge at one point and one of the door switches failed. No big deal right, easy to replace? No, apparently Samsung used some kind of custom switch instead of the bog standard cherry contact switch that basically everything and everyone has used for decades, and it's no longer being manufactured.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Samsungs don't just fail; they are incredibly precisely engineered to fail on purpose not too long after the warranty ends.

I had a Samsung front-load washing machine that failed after maybe six years or so: the drum quit turning and it started making a terrible banging noise instead. I decided to take it apart to see what went wrong. Every single part in it was pristine and in perfect working order -- electronic parts, mechanical parts, rubber parts, plastic parts, even the stainless-steel parts exposed to the water and detergent all that time -- everything looked brand-new.

That is, except for the "spider arm," which is the large bracket that connects the axle to the drum. That one single part was made out of a completely different kind of metal and had corroded completely through. It was blatantly designed not to stand up to water and detergent. The excellent condition of the metal in the rest of the machine showed that they were perfectly capable of choosing the right material for the job, but deliberately chose not to. It was the most brazen, shameless instance of planned obsolescence I've ever heard of before or since.

(Not my pic, but it looked pretty much like this -- except mine was in three wholly separate pieces! And, as I mentioned, the axle and drum were shiny and brushed, respectively, with zero rust or residue of any kind at all.)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

We have a refrigerator from the '80s that runs like a champ.

Solved the energy problem by putting solar panels on the roof.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t looked at the statistical data on this myself, but there’s something to be said for survivorship bias.

[–] BurnSquirrel 29 points 5 months ago

Not to mention those old fridges are Horribly inefficient on energy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 132 points 5 months ago (6 children)

forever cars no make profit line go up

[–] Usernameblankface 53 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Time to make a billion dollars on something else, then start up a car company designed to fail. No investors, design a car for a 60-70k buying price, few bells and whistles, but built to last indefinitely with basic maintenance. Start the company planning to practically close it down just after the last preorder customer has their car delivered and become a maintenance company with a few employees to make replacement parts and install them. If demand rises, redesign for the new times, ramp up and do it all again.

[–] kescusay 18 points 5 months ago

"Why do you hate freedom? And America? And puppies? And apple pie?" -Republicans, probably

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Planned obsolence should be illegal

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (25 children)

Like the new LED lightbulbs. Buy one now and they last a year or so. I bought one of them WAY back when they were brand new and horribly expensive and the damn thing still works just fine.

Companies can't stand new technologies that just work. They have to build in planned obsolescence. See also: smartphones, especially iTrash that make you buy a new one every year or two because updates slow them down.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Good ones still last a long time. What fails is generally not the LED itself but the cheap-ass rectifier in a cheap-ass case that is optimised for production price instead of heat dissipation. The fixture can also be an issue as nobody designed for heat dissipation in the days of incandescent bulbs, you might be baking those poor capacitors.

And those kinds of bulbs will stay available because there's plenty of commercial users doing their due diligence on life-time costs. Washing machines, fridges? Yes, those too, though commercial ones aren't necessarily cheap. Want a solid pair of pants? Ask a construction crew what they're wearing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The problem with LEDs isn't the bit that emits lights. It's the power supply, specifically the electrolytic capacitors. Good designs either use higher quality caps, or use designs that avoid electrolytic caps altogether. Either one takes a bit more money, but the market is always in a race to the bottom.

Long term, I think we should be avoiding traditional light fixtures entirely. It's better to have a lot of little lights spread over an area rather than a few point sources in the room. That gives us the opportunity to separate the power supply from the lights entirely, like LED strips do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] _sideffect 66 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Seriously, no one is going to mention "Right To Repair"? If this was law, and companies had to divulge how there stuff worked and was assembled, as well as sell parts, things would last longer. If every trade zone had a repairablity index, competition would make things last longer still.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

All cars could last a lot longer if people kept maintaining them and - importantly - didn't damage them. Electric cars are not going to be immune to this, I can't see them lasting much longer on average than ICE cars.

Keep in mind that even when you change out the engine for something with less parts the rest of the car still remains and contains things which will eventually cause issues. For example I bought a cheap van a few months ago and here's some of the reasons it was cheap that are not ICE specific:

  • Steering wheel lock mechanism sticking
  • Air distribution flap cables kinked/binding so A/C only blew at feet
  • Central locking on side door sticking
  • Rear shocks leaking
  • Front strut mount bushings worn
  • Head unit not functioning

Presumably the previous owner just didn't want to spend the money on fixing these issues as they arose, and eventually it added up into a lot of potential expense (if you have to pay someone to fix it for you) and more reasons to sell the car. Such behaviour seems pretty common in my experience and I fully expect it to continue with EVs. It'll be hard enough to get people to even maintain their brakes and change the motor coolant considering the natural reluctance of people to spend money on maintenance and this unfortunately prevalent idea that EVs don't need it.

Funnily enough the main ICE specific problem with that van was just as much an electrical issue as part of the petrol engine - an intermittent secondary air injection error code which ended up being down to a combination of a sticking valve and a fuse with a hairline crack causing an intermittent connection.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A lot of this also comes back to asshole design, and EV's can be particularly bad for this. Switching to large touch "entertainment" displays is a major issue. With my last ICE (Honda) vehicle, it was integrated into the backup+side cameras and a few comfort/convenience features. I could still replace that with a new head unit, though only certain ones would still support the cameras.

My wife's EV (Hyundai) on the other hand, the console isn't really made in a way where it seems swappable, and even if it was there are major system functions - such as configuring charge/power settings - which can only be configured from that (or the dogshyte app that screws up often and requires a paid subscription after 3yr)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LordWiggle 35 points 5 months ago (16 children)

Friend of mine bought an EV. Didn't even last a month. He landed in a tree.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Goddamn planned obsolescence.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago

*planted obsolescence

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (13 children)

What was the issue? Do you know?

[–] [email protected] 61 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Handing out driving licences like they were sweets instead of actually testing people's ability to drive, maybe?

[–] LordWiggle 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is often the issue. Not in this case though. He had his license for 24 years, while driving from the south of Germany to the Netherlands back and forth twice a month. He never had an accident before.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

I think the tree didn't give way when it should have and damaged it a bit, hard to tell though

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] tibi 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

After ~20-30 years, rubber gaskets and seals and cable insulation start failing. Plastic becomes brittle, especially if exposed to the sun. How do they solve this problem?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Fake4000 32 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What about it's batteries?

They are still chemical so they wouldn't last forever.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin 55 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Batteries can be replaced. An EV that could run 1 million miles would still need maintenance - I think the point is that they could be designed to last.

Planned obsolescence is so wide spread we don't even notice it, but lots of products are designed to fail either through cheaper components or deliberately flawed design. That means we have to go and buy a replacement. It is also generally cheaper.

So we either have cheap products that will break or seemingly expensive products but they last for a very long time. But in the long run the cheap products generally cost you more to buy than one expensive product.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho 28 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Yes, the batteries would need to be replaced but that means designing them to be replaced.

Unlike the Tesla model Y which built the battery into the frame and filled it with foam so that it absolutely cannot get replaced. Musk said the way to replace the battery is to send the entire car to the scrap yard and recover the lithium from the shredder.

[–] barsquid 15 points 5 months ago

Another reason on my list why to never buy a Tesla.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago

Car manufacturers:

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (13 children)

I've been taught that capitalism is all about innovation... So I'm sure the perfect long life car is just around the corner, they wouldn't actually just build crappy cars just to force us in a never ending cycle of consumerism, right?... Right?

/S ... in case it wasn't on the nose enough

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] capital 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

I would love to see a car company create a vehicle platform with battery replacements central to the design of the car. Make larger packs out of smaller units so their larger models (or simply longer range models) simply use more of the smaller pack units. Recycle old packs back into making newer ones to reduce the need to mine more materials.

Sure, charge me enough on the replacement to keep this cycle going. Buying a car you know will get battery (and therefore range) upgrades as time goes on is a no-brainer.

Imagine the goodwill and free word-of-mouth advertising you would receive if you went the extra mile and open sourced all the software for the vehicle and allowed users to modify it if they wanted. Make the car not look like dogshit and I imagine you'd do well.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Surely the free market and competition will deliver what customers want, right? ... Right?!?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I mean most things can, it just isn't profitable...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (6 children)

My family bought an electric forklift for their factory in the early 90s. I think it is a Yale.

My sister has since taken over the forklift for her company and she has only replaced the batteries and the controller once.

These things are cheap to replace and not as much of a mystery as ICE engines.

I am seeing people replace old Prius hybrid batteries themselves with basic tools now.

I think the only thing I would be concern about is the crash safety for cars. Newer cars are safer. I think that would be the only draw to buy a newer vehicle.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Its really worth reading the whole Article. Im looking forward to long lasting EVs, but I really fear that, what the author also described in his article, may come true. I think we will see that car manufacturers will start to act like hardware company's and start to force you to regularly buy a new car by making your car incompatible to new features or by designing it to fail after a few years.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (21 children)

I bet smartphones could last 3 or 4 years even if companies let them 😏

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

so do most electronics.

but you know, line must go up.

[–] Etterra 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good luck with that. Planned obsolescence is a key ingredient in capitalism. I mean what better way to make line go up than to turn a one-time purchase into a repeat purchase? This shareholders and executives will never be able to step on the working class if they can't gouge customers. Won't anyone think of the shareholders?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›