this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
313 points (88.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

34303 readers
227 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 month ago (18 children)

You chose to buy it at that price. What does it matter what the original price was or how much the seller made? You thought the price was fair, had the choice to not buy it or buy it somewhere else.

This isn't like scalpers buying up items, creating artificial scarcity and driving up prices for profit. This is just plain old capitalism.

Presumably the price also included shipping and handling fees, since you bought it online. So in the end the seller probably made just a couple of quid, he deserves to get paid for what he does no?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Illuminostro 75 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait until you learn about the CEO of Goodwill bragging about all the idiots who give him free shit to sell.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

Even worse, how much his wife was paid in the 90's, and the percentage of Goodwill income that goes to helping people.

Fuck good will.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like I'm gonna fucking spend my time trying to sell my old t-shirts for $2.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I do to get back at them is to take all our decent donation stuff to local thrift stores and all the bulky crap that's barely hanging together goes to Goodwill for them to dispose of.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah I actually hear they're a shit company, but the idea that they're somehow pulling one over on the people who donate is fucking rich.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is tacky to leave the sticker on there with the lower price, but you are the one who paid 12£. How does it matter what they paid? If they search for books to resell at a profit, that's time spent, risk taken, and money earned.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It always sucks to know you paid more than the seller did - but that just means Oxfam undervalued the book.

Having worked in one, charity shops tend to have a habit of either really undervaluing or overvaluing their donated goods - cause the people who actually set the prices mostly just guess based on looks and nothing more. Only if an item looks expensive will they do any research, and even then never really enough.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Our local shop has a database of values.

Granted, it's not perfect, but I would assume since they have one it's a publicly traded commodity (that is someone maintains a DB and sells it to such organizations).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

With the rise of ebay thrift resalers, I feel like all the charity/thrift stores around me price rather aggressively.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, don't buy it online then go get it from the thrift store yourself. Oh that takes valuable time and effort? Guess that's why it was marked up, peoples' time is worth money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because I live in another country, a non English speaking one, so there's zero chance that thud book will make it to my country thrift store

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

My case rests, the seller of the book provided you a valuable service then by making a product available to you that you otherwise wouldn't be able to get, and you're mad that they made a little money for their time?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So you're annoyed that someone (who took the time to go to a charity shop, list the book online, and ship it to you) charged you the RRP for the book, that you didn't have to buy from them?

I hope you have the same kind of energy for when mega-corporations charge anything from tens to thousands of pounds for products that often cost single pounds or even pennies to manufacture (due to underpaying for labour and materials that were in turn manufactured by underpaid labour as well), and the snowballing impact they have on the rest of the economy (by pricing out smaller companies, monopolising industries, avoiding tax, and so on).

The person you bought this from likely works for themsleves, trolling charity shops all day for bargains, and almost certainly pays tax on their income. I'm as anti-capitalist as they get, but even I can't take issue with this. If they had charged you more than the RRP, sure, that'd pushing it, but if you didn't want to pay full price, you should have spent your own time looking for the bargain. ¯\(ツ)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

You should definitely spend time trawling through Oxfam shops for books, if this annoys you.

[–] Wrench 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Rofl. Imagine being mildly infuriated that someone marked up a bargain bin purchase by $10 to cover their time and effort to make it available to you to buy from the comfort of your home.

Why don't you spend your own day rummaging through thrift stores for it next time?

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We shit on 'upselling' all the time. If you cleaned those pages, pressed them back and touched up the spine of the book, sure. But I'd be annoyed too if there was a 500% markup on a resale of used material

[–] Wrench 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You see 500% markup.

I see 10 pounds for the time and effort to shop around for bargains, then storing your haul, list the items online, and the cost of the other dozens of books that never sell, and then time and effort to package and ship, and whatever customer service along the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

listen, you paid what you thought it was worth to you that's how retail works they buy product, then sell them at a markup you buy products from them only if you think it's worth the price they're asking you get the product, they get the money

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think about the price, It's about reselling something you got at a charity.

Plenty of stores sell cheap, used stuff that everyone can fit in their budgets. More and more of these resellers are picking the stores clean, leaving a lot less available for those who "need" it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

charity shops aren't for those who "need" the products, their sole purpose is to generate funds for the charity. have you lost your mind?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] menemen 18 points 1 month ago

A used book for 12£ is maybe 8€ more than I normally spent on used books.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Putting the £ sign after the value is in itself mildly infuriating.

[–] ClockworkOtter 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mildly?

I'm going to assume they're not British...

[–] waz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe they just typed it out how they would say it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bokherif 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most book sellers on the Internet roam around, buy used books, cut them to make them look new and then sell it as new.

[–] jonkenator 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cut them? What does that man?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

They take a bit off the edges, which, when done right, can make them look new at a first glance

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Using a paper cutter, aligning the worn pages along the outside edge of the book into a nice looking rectangle

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Bought where on the internet? I think that context is quite relevant tbh.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Costs money and time to package and ship stuff. They should've at least removed the sticker though.

[–] meekah 4 points 1 month ago

Takes time and money to do that as well though, and I kinda feel like op would not have appreciated that markup

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›