this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
255 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18073 readers
3061 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But, but, but he's a do nothing president because [mental gymnastics intensifies]!!1! (/s)

[–] AbidanYre 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You'll have to be faster than that if you want to get here before givesomefucks starts complaining that anything Biden does is actually bad.

[–] someguy3 18 points 2 months ago

Oh I missed the username, yeah that fits.

[–] baru 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hahaha, apparently someone is really predictable.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 7 points 2 months ago

Pro Tip: Clicking on the username usually gives the option to block that user.

[–] BigilusDickilus 10 points 2 months ago

This is undeniably good and I would like to see more. I would really like to see the federal government seriously look at the issues with power transmission and storage as those are the main hold ups in green energy right now and a lot of that is regulatory hurdles.

We could pretty easily hit all of our renewable goals in 5 years if power transmission projects didn't constantly get bogged down in NIMBY lawsuits.

I am not saying that the apparatus of government should be used to run roughshod over people with concerns about this, but we cannot let individuals stop vital infrastructure projects.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 2 months ago
[–] buzz86us 5 points 2 months ago

How about immunity from tariffs, and federally backed installation so people can afford them?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden is marking Earth Day by announcing $7 billion in federal grants for residential solar projects serving 900,000-plus households in low- and middle-income communities.

Solar is gaining traction as a key renewable energy source that could reduce the nation’s reliance on fossil fuels, which emit planet-warming greenhouse gases.

But solar energy can have high costs for initial installation, making it inaccessible for many Americans — and potentially meaning a mingling of environmental policy with election-year politics.

It was established in 1936 as a summer camp for underprivileged youth from Washington, part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Civilian Conservation Corps to help create jobs during the Great Depression.

Biden officials counter that GOP policies benefit highly profitable oil companies and could ultimately undermine U.S. efforts to compete with the Chinese in the renewable energy sector.

He said the programs can “unlock economic opportunity to create pathways to middle-class-supporting careers, to save people money and improve their quality of life.”


The original article contains 812 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I’m trying to follow the money down, and in my state it appears to be for municipalities for small to mid size power grid use

[–] mlg -4 points 2 months ago

Dammit I made it too late to the post to mention the absurd solar panel tariff that preceded this because "muh China bad"

It won't be as bad as the domestic chip production, but this stuff is gonna get wasted just like the totally 100% legit for real this time national rail program 2 electric boogaloo.