this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
237 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18242 readers
5909 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ganksy 73 points 3 months ago (2 children)

...and finally something not completely fucked happened. Hope we meet again.

[–] elbarto777 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Actually, no. I don't hope we meet again. I want that bunch of clowns be replaced by normal functioning human beings, with differing ideologies but willing to work for the wellness of the country.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They passed a huge amount of aid for Israel like 2 minutes after

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The worst option was funding Israel and not Ukraine, but Israel can genocide Palestine just fine without any more American aid.

The only way to change that reality is to force a regime change or invade.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As a small silver lining, about a third of the Israeli aid package was humanitarian aid for Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

We'll see how much of it Israel actually lets them have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

They don't need the money no, although we did for some fuckin reason just give them an amount of money equal to about their total yearly defense budget.

However, they desperately need the diplomatic cover we give them on the world stage. The western world is well capable to make life miserable via sanctions for any country that isn't playing ball to what we want them to do (Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc), to say nothing of getting hauled to the Hague to stand trial. Without the US shielding them from diplomatic consequences I think the theoretical ability to do their killing in a physical sense wouldn't be something they felt nearly as free with.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 months ago

112 Russian assets we need to purge this November

[–] negativenull 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Members voted 311-112 to pass the $60.8bn package, which the Senate had previously passed.

passed by the skin of the house's teeth

[–] Rapidcreek 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This bill was not passed by the Senate. The Senate is scheduled to begin voting on this bill on Tuesday.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Remember a couple years ago when we gave Ukraine tons of shit immediately and for a split second it felt okay to be an American?

[–] Rapidcreek 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"I don't need a ride, I need ammo." Was perhaps the wisest thing to say to the American people.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Remember "The leader of the party is here. The head of the presidential administration is here, Prime Minister Shmyhal is here, Podolyak is here, the president is here. We are all here, the soldiers are here, the citizens of the country are here."?

I remember going to sleep expecting to wake up in the morning and learn the guy had been killed or captured, and the Russians had taken Kyiv.

Shit was wild. There's a reason the eastern front line hasn't budged, with them outnumbered the whole time and outgunned by 10:1 for as long as it took to finish the first Gulf War.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

It’s no surprise they stayed, can you imagine finding an airplane that could carry the balls on those guys?

[–] Ensign_Crab 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if they have the votes for cloture on the inevitable filibuster.

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 3 months ago

I don't believe that's a problem. Remember, they already passed a bipartisan iteration of these bills. Rand Paul has promised to slow it down, but they'll run him over if they have to.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He should threaten to switch parties if they vote him out. That’s like 2 retirements.

[–] FenrirIII 10 points 3 months ago

Democrats don't want him. He's a loon

[–] transmatrix 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Two things: I bet this just saved Johnson’s bacon. Democrats will likely reward him by not voting against him when MTG raises the vacate vote. I’ll also bet that this only happened because Trump didn’t back Johnson even after he went and kissed the ring.

[–] Triasha 15 points 3 months ago

I think Johnson got into briefing rooms with the white house, the CIA, and the Joint Chiefs, and realized that the maga games have the potential to spiral into world war 3. Death and destruction beyond anything humanity has ever seen.

And he started figuring out how to givern like an adult. McCarthy had already burned too many bridges with Dems. They hated him. Johnson was a fresh face and Dems were desperate for someone they could cut deals with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mike Johnson giving off some strong Simon Barron from 30 Rock vibes in that pic