this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
883 points (99.8% liked)

196

16511 readers
3022 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrJameGumb 76 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I often have to close out of Lemmy for a while when there are too many political posts because I realize it's just making me angry lol

[–] [email protected] 115 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

I definitely understand; but it’s good that you are angry, because that means you are human.

[–] MrJameGumb 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That is the exact face I make right before I've decided that's enough Internet for today lol

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Saaame 😫

[–] kamenlady 5 points 8 months ago

And after making that decision, comes the realization that i went to bed like 8 hours ago and have to be in the office in 2 hours sigh

[–] NielsBohron 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're not angry, you're not paying attention.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And that's why many people don't pay attention; they don't like to feel angry all the time.

[–] NielsBohron 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I understand. I feel that way occasionally, too, but honestly, I think that's irresponsible. Apathy and an unwillingness to pay attention to injustice are huge contributing factors to why the world is as fucked as it is today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

No it’s not doing anything about injustice that is making the world as fucked up as it is today. And that isn’t happening because we are being disempowered.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Choosing to not pay attention, is not irresponsible.

It's torture, that we've been gaslit to think is "easier".

It's not easier, the people who do it are victims, methodically traumatized to turn off their empathy, and they are metaphorically drowning.

This is no reason to necessarily try to save them (they pose a real danger, thinking it's "everyone for themselves"), and many of them are drowning while being rich and powerful as fuck, causing huge damage along the way down. So don't feel guilt for not breaking bread with them. Do fight them, and do tell them to fuck off.

But we shouldn't turn our empathy off either. Feeling alone enough to justify being violent to others, is Hell. And part of the solution to our situation is to make a world where it's harder for people to end up like them.

[–] jaybone 10 points 8 months ago

I was hoping they could make an AI that would be angry for me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Thanks. I've been very angry out of a feeling of complete helplessness. I'm reading a book about data bias in relation to gender (invisible women) and it's hitting a lot of sore points that come up being in an office that's 10% female... There's four of us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Aaahhh, there's the juice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Yes. I read too many as it is, but sometimes I think “This isn’t educational. It’s just ragebait. No thanks.”

[–] BuryMyHorse 4 points 8 months ago

You can block things or switch instance, become a social nomad. The fediverse is your oister!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I've just filtered out the political keywords and it's made it a lot better for me lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I had a good four year stretch where I just had to filter out everything political. I figured it's better to be ignorant than to be constantly stressed and angry.

[–] Kase 1 points 8 months ago

Hey, if it was good for you, then good for you. I've done the same for shorter stretches of time, about two years one time. It helped my mental health a lot, and then I came back having the energy to actually get involved and do something.
In case anyone needs to hear it, it's okay and normal to take a break. Or seek support, or whatever you need to do. No lemming is an island, or something like that.

[–] MrJameGumb 1 points 8 months ago

I like reading some political posts, especially it they're about something that's actually good lol Now I mostly just scroll past them all unless something really catches my eye

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I'm the same way with meditation subs.

[–] _number8_ 46 points 8 months ago (2 children)

the really stupid thing is that i feel like if i go and watch a film or read something for a few hours, that's an isolated experience. i'm disconnected from the (vague) sense of community i feel online; i feel like i'm missing things.

but then i go back online and it's the same garbage. even just 10 years ago it used to be good garbage, now it's just stuff that irritates me

[–] BuryMyHorse 18 points 8 months ago

Present day, present time hahaha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Movies have objectively gone to shit.

It's like our culture got permanently constipated around 1985. The writers born before that are aging out about now.

A creative culture is a relaxed culture with lots of free time. Now it's common to work 2 jobs and never afford a house.

Maybe a meteor will hit us. I hear there's an "eclipse" coming soon.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

idea for lemmy: sort by awful

it's just the highest proportion of downvotes to upvotes (with some minimum upvotes/comments)

yes I do hate myself

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That’s basically sort by controversial, no?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

No, it would be the opposite of the top filter. Controversial is posts that have a similar amount of downvotes to upvotes.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Denathor doomscrolling on the Palantir.

Meanwhile Saruman is a LoL whale.

[–] DrDominate 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What champion would Sarumon main?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Doesn't matter, he'd afk halfway through the match

[–] petersr 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Who would have thought that Tolkien would be 100 years ahead by depicting smart phone addiction. He even got the fact right that you become invisible (ie isolated in your room, not going out) when you use it.

[–] applebusch 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To me the ring feels more like heroine or cocaine or something, you know one of the drugs that just make people feel good. The hobbits had no real ambition for more than a good life, and they pretty much all already had that, so when Bilbo or Frodo used the ring it was like "heh, nice" and then they went back to their great life with no desire to use it again. Of course they're basically microdosing while they carry it so they eventually start to incur the cost. Frodo only really starts to get corrupted after months of grueling travel and suffering, and losing hope of ever returning to his life in the Shire. Everyone else has all these obligations and ambitions that weigh on them, and much like regular people they've given up varying degrees of their happiness to further those goals, so the ring would feel like getting back everything they've sacrificed and being happy again, or for the first time for some. The metaphor is a bit of a stretch, but I think it fits broadly with these magical artifacts that corrupt people. Just like cocaine, heroin, meth, morphine, or whatever, they give people a feeling that they can't just get over. It's biology, they hijack the reward system so we have no choice but to push the feel good button unless we can overcome the urge through willpower or getting whatever feeling the drug or magical artifact is replacing naturally. Some people only get so corrupted but some just keep going, chasing the dragon and replacing more and more of their life with the fake feelings of the drug or magical item.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

It does not take ambition to enjoy cocaine.