this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
1296 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6017 readers
2046 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeLookBehind 96 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The working class people are the only reason the CEO has a title or any money at all. Take the janitor out of the building and it fills up with trash. Take the CEO out of the building and wonder why they were even there in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm reminded of the Irish Bank Strike, where the banks threw a hissy fit about some law and decided to close until it was repealed.

Life went on pretty much as normal, with pub owners becoming the new arbiters of credit worthiness, and eventually the banks had to give up.

[–] z00s 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's actually pretty smart because if someone has no money for booze, then you know they've really got no money

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Plus, at the time, the pub owners basically knew everybody in town even if they didn't know each other.

[–] deweydecibel 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The CEOs are absolutely overpaid for what little they actually do, but I'm not sure I willing to say they do literally nothing. It's not exactly being a capitalist boot licker to acknowledge that there needs to be somebody steering the ship.

Or are you talking about literally just the building? Because frankly there are a lot of working class people who don't actually need to be in the building at all and nothing would change if they weren't there.

[–] z00s 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] captainlezbian 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Coordinating a plan and orchestrating the various parts of the organization towards it. Listen I prefer janitors to CEOs, but I’ve had some really bad executives and I understand that worker owned coops often have management and executives for a reason

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The CEO... sorry, ALL the management should answer to the workers first. That or pull the work by themselves without the workers.

[–] captainlezbian 3 points 9 months ago

Fully agree, though I’m a syndicalist so if course I think that

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 9 months ago

CEOs would literally refuse to come to work if their offices weren't clean.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] linearchaos 42 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It depends on the Janitor and CEO in question

I've known some nice hardworking nice dedicated janitors.

I've known some punks that got there by being miserable to everyone around them.

Come to think of it, the same two conditions apply to various CEO's I know as well :)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

The main difference was probably who their dads were.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How dare you to suggest not all CEOs are exactly the same. Do you have any idea how difficult concept that is to fit into my black and white worldview?

[–] FlyingSquid 8 points 9 months ago

Not all CEOs are the same. All CEOs are less necessary than janitors.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] z00s 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The janitor sees what's in everyone's rubbish bins. That motherfucker knows things.

[–] Agent641 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He does not understand why I use sugar free sweetener in my coffee to cut down on sugar but eat dangerous amounts of normal sugar black jellybeans. Neither do I.

[–] menemen 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Try drinking your coffee without sugar and milk. Might take a few weeks, but at some point you will start hating coffee with sugar and start enjoying the real taste of coffee.

(Then you'll find out how perfect black unsweetened coffee fits to milk chocolate and gain 20kg.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Or hating coffee. Then return to water

[–] Agent641 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sorry my friend, but I drink instant coffee. It's going to taste shit no matter how I have it.

[–] RGB3x3 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to live that way.

[–] Agent641 3 points 9 months ago

It's too late for me, br¤ther, but you can still save yourself!

[–] menemen 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Get a handheld milk frother to mix your instant coffee to improve your instant coffee game. (You don't have to use the Nestle stuff, any good tasting instant coffee is alright.)

I actually enjoy instant coffee, but I use this crazy invention. Sadly it is not made anymore.

Tbh though, I prefer the French press, the Moka pot, the Cezve or the portafilter espresso. But if I am lazy, I actually prefer well prepared instant coffee over fully automatic coffee machines or filter coffee and you can hunt me with this Nespresso shit. Maybe I am weird.

[–] NounsAndWords 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Every time I feel overworked I think about how many additional employees my boss's excessive salary could pay for.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

It's really fun if you do non-finance work at a finance place.

You've got the internal accountants trying to deny a request for $500 a year for a piece of business critical tech/software that you need to support the people who swing around half a mil in investments like it's nothing.

I really shouldn't complain. I'm paid quite well for what I do and I have a shit ton of flexibility. But there's a lot of times that the absurdity is so thick it could be cut with a knife.

[–] FlyingSquid 33 points 9 months ago

The janitor makes sure the building is clean and smells okay and that the toilets don't look like they're in a sewer rather than just connected to it.

The CEO... makes themselves richer. Even if the company goes under.

[–] Dasnap 28 points 9 months ago

A janitor knows how to clean up a mess.

[–] EfreetSK 19 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Listen, every time you work with say 10 or 20 people, people start to disorganize. You can have a Fishing Club or organize a LAN party and it'll probably happen. And it becomes kind of obvious that it'd be good to have a person that would have general overview of the thing and they'll focus to keep the thing on the track, resolve conflicts etc. You want to call that person a leader, boss, cheff, CEO, captain, whatever, but at certain group size it becomes kind of necessary.

This person needs certain skills to be good at it. Is it more complicated than janitor? Probably yes. Should you respect them more than a janitor? No. Should this person have astronomical sallary? No. Should you guilotine this person? No.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Nobody is complaining about the concept of leadership, it's that the CEO is responsible to the shareholders, not the workers.

[–] agent_flounder 3 points 9 months ago

Nor to the customers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A manager is a role precisely like that of a janitor and should get the same respect.

They both keep the workplace clean and operational. They don't actually make the business any money, but are both necessary for ideal operations.

However, only one of them has delusions of grandeur that they're irreplaceable and ilis generally willing to maim or kill people indirectly to better their personal station. And it isn't the Janitor.

[–] GlitterInfection 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] EfreetSK 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know, I know and I know Lemmy's history with far-left and I know this is memes community. But everytime I see such oversimplified thing it becomes kind of scarry to me. I mean the worst human attrocities in the history started with oversimplified "this group of people = BAD! Even worse, they're daemons! Kill them!". So I'm just trynig to calm things down and bring some ballance to the force

[–] GlitterInfection 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

I don't disagree.

Lemmy makes me feel like a centrist despite being much more of a democratic socialist on the issues.

But it's a battle I try not to fight here since people are extremely intolerant to opinions they disagree with, much more so than Reddit was. I haven't seen a single nuanced conversation about anything deeper than "how is your day going" since joining up with this place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

The fact that even my most heavily downvoted comments usually have some upvotes too tells me that I'm not shouting into a void. If me trying to make sense of things out in the public makes even one person reconsider their position then I see that as a success. The mobbing and ad-hominem attacks haven't ever made me change my mind about anything so it's just wasted time on their part. It's also a good way to lure out the meanest commentors so that I can block them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

My days in Reddit (and by extension, Lemmy) pulls me over from the left side. I remember when r/LSC still seems profound to me.

I'm only here now for funny memes with hierarchical comments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641 4 points 9 months ago

Lefty lemmy, righty reddit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is questioning leadership, but CEOs ain't there to lead, they are there for the bottom line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Whom then do I guillotine?

I didnt sharpen this bad boy for nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes, but what happens when you have fifteen of these groups? You need a person with the general overview of those groups.

And how about fifteen of those level 2 groups.... does the person over those groups have any clue what is done on the actual work level? Should they be guillotined for claiming that without them nothing would be done and therefore they need as much as the cumulative pay under them? (Hint:Yes)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Look, all I'm gonna say is I know which job is easier.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest 18 points 9 months ago

It's CEO, isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

9 times outta 10, I am the janitor so of course I respect myself more.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›