this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
483 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18073 readers
4487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LOS ANGELES (CN) — The FBI informant indicted on charges of giving the bureau false information about President Joe Biden and his son Hunter which was subsequently used by Republican lawmakers and pundits to try to discredit the administration lost his bid to stay out of jail.

U.S. District Judge Otis Wright II, at a hearing Monday morning in downtown Los Angeles, remanded Alexander Smirnov to jail to await his trial.

"There's nothing garden variety about his case," Wright said in rejecting the arguments of Smirnov's attorney that he wasn't a flight risk.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] normanwall 71 points 4 months ago
[–] Evilcoleslaw 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Awesome. Otis Wright ftw. I've seen quite a few cases where his decisions have been excellent. I remember his decision on sanctioning the Prenda Law attorneys for their porn copyright shakedowns that was peppered with Star Trek references.

[–] cm0002 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Prenda Law attorneys for their porn copyright shakedowns that was peppered with Star Trek references.

What? I'm gonna need a link to share with [email protected] lmao

[–] asteriskeverything 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Uh you follow judges?? How, or does he just pop up in the news a lot? It is the most frustrating part of voting for me because I often have to vote for judges and all these small but meaningful positions and I can search far and wide and still not able to make a more meaningful decision than flipping a coin. I hate it so if anyone knows some sources that cover conviction rates or SOMETHING. Anything.

[–] Evilcoleslaw 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I follow a lot of copyright law stuff and general law stuff on YouTube. So he comes up in that kind of news every so often. It helps that a friend of mine was a party that was shaken down by those Prenda Law attorneys. Basically, you torrented porn, settle for $3-5k now or we drag your name through the mud. Only it turns out they were doing a lot of fraud as well as the extortion.

But anyway he's a Federal District Court judge so he's appointed though. And my state is one where the judges aren't elected either so I don't really follow that or have any resources.

[–] MushuChupacabra 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago
[–] cabron_offsets 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hominine 0 points 4 months ago

Deputies!

Just going to assume that this is the translation.

[–] Fedizen 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The FBI informant program has always been such a joke.

[–] FenrirIII 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure there have been plenty of success stories, but any information on politicians I would consider suspicious

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Which is of course part of why the information was on a form for unvetted / untrustworthy information, but the red team wanted an official form to wave around regardless of trustworthiness.