this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
547 points (98.8% liked)

196

16574 readers
2524 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Gaming on lower resolution because it's a pixel art game

[–] clearleaf 21 points 9 months ago

And then it's blurry because technology is amazing.

[–] rambaroo 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Gaming on 8K because it's a pixel art game

[–] Psythik 3 points 9 months ago

This person gets it.

[–] antidote101 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Gaming on low resolution because the game is premised on low poly fun, not high end graphics covering for mediocre gameplay.

[–] Maggoty 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
  • Gaming on lower resolution because electricity prices are high.

  • Gaming on lower resolution because it removes obstacles and gives a tactical advantage.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago
  • Gaming on a new GPU because it's faster
  • Gaming on an old GPU because it's VRAM is dying and sometimes the walls disappear
[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (4 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It ticks me off when i see twitch streamers with the fps displayed and its running at 300+ fps. What a waste of electricity, money and hardware.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Chriswild 5 points 9 months ago

Not only does this reduce GPU power usage but CPU as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Already set. I'm not that competitive player and my reflexes are worse than a sloth's. So I didn't even bother to buy a higher refresh rate monitor than 60.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sploosh 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

My 7800xt pulls about 230 watts at full bore, giving me my monitor's refresh rate in FPS, 144. Limiting the framerate to 72 results in no tearing and drops the GPU watts to 170. Worth it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Halving your frame rate is worth approximately a cent an hour?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

Just consider! If you're gaming 80 hours a week you could save $3.50 off your monthly bill. 12 hours a day gaming, such savings!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean for those of us who don't need anything higher than 60, yeah

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The comment I was replying to had a 144hz monitor

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dlok 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Adding a frame limiter and dropping the resolution a bit saves me 200W. Yay RTX3090

[–] taiyang 11 points 9 months ago

Retro gaming... Low res... CRT filter with the warped edges and blooooooom effects... this is the ideal way to play your SNES games. Try it with Super Metroid, that shit is straight up unnerving and beautiful.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Nice cucumber you got there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I have a Watt-Meter right on my PC plug next to my monitor so I can always see how much I consume. It's crazy how much the monitors alone take up, it's kind 40 KW/h each. I'm considering removing one of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Neither hopefully. The former at least is a unit of power, but 40 kW is enough to heat up a whole apartment building.

In reality a large and older monitor might use a couple hundred watts. A small modern 24" will probably use closer to 50 W (guesstimating), which is still a decent chunk of the power draw of a budget build.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sploosh 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

KWh is a measure of total energy, not instantaneous power. Your watt meter was saying that since last reset of the value it measured 40 KWh of energy use. That's not an insignificant amount - a Chevy Bolt can go around 180 miles on 40KWh. Watts, or kilowatts, are instantaneous power. That same Bolt can easily pull 100KW while accelerating and if it could somehow do that for an hour, it would have used 100KWh. It could never make it the whole hour as it has a 65KWh battery, so it would run out after 39 minutes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What you're describing is kWh, not kW/h. You need to multiply power with time to get back to energy. An appliance using 1kW of power for 1h "uses" 1kWh of energy. The same appliance running for 2h requires 2kWh instead.

kW/h doesn't really make sense as a unit, although it could technically describe the rate at which energy consumption changes over time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is why I do love that my PC is powered by renewable energy. It blows my mind how expensive power is everywhere else, plus I don't wanna game if it means I gotta roll coal like huge parts of the world.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Quebec / BC moment

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I game on lower resolution because a lot of modern games are too hyper detailed for me and I get lost in the crisp information density. That and I hate the sound of computer fans

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I get lost in the crisp information density.

Man you're gonna hate this thing called the real world. I hear the pixels are mere nanometers across

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the crisp part. A lot of modern games seem to be obsessed with making every single pixel pop out at you. Rummaging around outside is not like that it's softer. A real world comparison would be something like malls which are obsessed with making every inch of visible space distinctly pop. I also hate being in malls

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Oh like too saturated and colorful. Yeah I get that

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas 3 points 9 months ago

I've been replaying FFXIV recently and I had the game running at the maximum refresh rate of my monitor and it was making the fans run harder. it took me way too long to realise that I should just go a setting down for refresh rate instead of altering fan speeds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago
  • Buying Noctua NH-D15 because it keeps the CPU the coolest
  • Buying 360mm AIO because it is the most silent
[–] clearleaf 5 points 9 months ago

Gaming on lower resolution because 480p just feels like home.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

But seriously though, I cut off a good 30-40% from my GPUs power limit and would you look at that, I still enjoy the games I play.

Have to run most of them at low to medium settings anyway, so might as well.

Only thing left to improve it further would be undervolting, I should try that at some point.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hOrni 4 points 9 months ago

Gaming on a lower resolution because I'm playing a JRPG from the 90s.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Games that drop framerate when game loses focus are fun. Something like Wurm or RS don't need fancier framerate when I'm not even looking!

[–] Psythik 3 points 9 months ago

Every game can do this. It's a setting in your GPU's control panel.

[–] TechAdmin 3 points 9 months ago

Sometimes I'll lower resolution or quality just so a game loads quicker.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Current state of the world

load more comments
view more: next ›