this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024

485 points (98.6% liked)

News

23619 readers

4226 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

485

Speeding Seattle officer who struck and killed student will not face charges (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave to c/news

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Death of Jaahnavi Kandula, 23, from India, ignited outrage after fellow officer was recorded making ‘appalling’ remarks about case

Prosecutors in Washington state said on Wednesday they will not file felony charges against a Seattle police officer who struck and killed a graduate student from India while responding to an overdose call – a case that attracted widespread attention after another officer was recorded making callous remarks about it.

Officer Kevin Dave was driving 74mph (119km/h) on a street with a 25mph (40km/h) speed limit in a police SUV before he hit 23-year-old Jaahnavi Kandula in a crosswalk on 23 January 2023.

In a memo to the Seattle police department on Wednesday, the King county prosecutor’s office noted that Dave had on his emergency lights, that other pedestrians reported hearing his siren, and that Kandula appeared to try to run across the intersection after seeing his vehicle approaching. She might also have been wearing wireless earbuds that could have diminished her hearing, they noted.

For those reasons, a felony charge of vehicular homicide was not warranted. “There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Officer Dave was consciously disregarding safety,” the memo said.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BrotherL0v3 180 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Something you hear a lot from EMTs is that they take a lot of care not to make a medical emergency worse by adding to the number of victims. "Scene safety" is a big thing, the logic being that if you try to help someone in an unsafe way, you may end up just adding to the problem.

You'd think the same would apply to cops? Doing 75 in a 25 seems like the same kind of thing, especially in an area with pedestrians around. Doing 50 over to get to someone that needs help and hitting someone along the way isn't actually helping.

Oh, also:

Kandula’s death ignited outrage, especially after a recording from another officer’s body-worn camera surfaced last September, in which that officer laughed and suggested that Kandula’s life had “limited value” and the city should “just write a check”.

Jesus Christ, fuck the police.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That second cop is the vice president of the Seattle police union. The person he was talking to on the phone when he minimized the death and talked about how worthless she was? The president of the police union.

[–] Tujio 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seattle PD is pretty fucking bad.

Seattle Police Officer's Guild is even worse.

The leadership at SPOG is about as bad a it gets in big cities. Look at anything that Mike Solan has done in his career, but especially look into his words and actions around the BLM riots and CHOP. It's fucking embarrassing that a city of our caliber has a police force of their caliber.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Seattle was also under an injunction from the Department of Justice for repeated rights violations as was Portland Police Bureau. It seems the police in many leftist cities are exceptionally heinous and I'm sure both of these departments are full of Proud Boys and their ilk.

[–] bibliotectress 5 points 10 months ago

It seems the police in many leftist cities are exceptionally heinous and I'm sure both of these departments are full of Proud Boys and their ilk.

You're right. I'm from Chicago and the cops there are pretty bad. New York is bad, too. Maybe it's their safe space? Or it's cops everywhere. I'm not really sure.

[–] bl4ckblooc 30 points 10 months ago

I’ve seen this in the way that police drive in my city compared to other emergency responders.

About two years ago, there was an incident in a town south of me that required the strategic response unit or whatever term they are calling themselves. On my way home from work I see some huge police vehicles start coming down the highway behind me, so I pull over. But this is an 8-lane highway in town, at an intersection that is red so there isn’t a lot of room for everyone to pull over.

Usually when this happens (this is the main highway/road through town, and the ambulances need to use it all the time) the emergency vehicle will slowly weave its way through traffic, as people who couldn’t pull over the the side of the road made space however they could. If that means driving on the wrong side of the road for 100 metres, they will.

These ‘specially trained’ police officers however, came to a complete stop multiple times behind vehicles, then starting blaring their horns to make the vehicles move even when there wasn’t really a spot they could move to. These cops refused to drive in any other lane other than the left most lane.

The next day an article came out, saying that the incident was resolved without this special unit because they didn’t get there in time.

[–] Coreidan 20 points 10 months ago

The difference is that EMTs mission is to help people. Cops aren’t there to help anyone. They are there to keep poor people in order

[–] ocassionallyaduck 69 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Will not face charges in a court of law.

The law exists to avoid mob rule. When the law completely abandons any pretense of justice, that's when mobs become emboldened by necessity.

[–] Soggy 11 points 10 months ago

I wish we could get some mobs organized up here. If one tenth of the stuff Fox said about Seattle protests was true we might see some actual change.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago (13 children)

In a memo to the Seattle police department on Wednesday, the King county prosecutor’s office noted that Dave had on his emergency lights, that other pedestrians reported hearing his siren, and that Kandula appeared to try to run across the intersection after seeing his vehicle approaching. She might also have been wearing wireless earbuds that could have diminished her hearing

It's possible this was her fault, but there are an awful lot of caveats in there. This looks like a kitchen sink of possible excuses. But also, we should have definitive answers to those questions before deciding not to prosecute, shouldn't we?

"He might not have been at fault."

"Oh! Case closed."

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Apparently wearing headphones means it's your fault? Sucks for the hard of hearing.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

Deaf? Straight to suicide by cop.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

With them saying she tried to run across the road, she likely saw him coming but didn't realize he was driving 3x the speed limit and would cover a ton of ground in a split second. Prosecutors refusing to charge this as vehicular homicide is a bullshit smokescreen as they should be able to charge him with manslaughter.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The one that makes it sound like the kitchen sink is the headphones, the others pretty clearly paint it as her carelessness, if true. It sounds like she wasn't really paying attention or looking while crossing the road, saw the car and ran. Meanwhile the officer could have also seen her and tried to avoid, unfortunately running into each other, like two people walking towards each other moving the same way to try and avoid.

The article says "appeared" but I think that's less of an uncertainty and more the technical language employed, like how a newspaper calls someone "an alleged criminal". The video itself may be far more clear cut - without seeing that I'd reserve judgement.

74mph in a 25mph sounds excessive, though, especially for a police officer responding to what should be primarily a medical emergency.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your answer reads the most reasonably here IMO. I have crossed a road at a run to beat an approaching car before, and had I been struck it definitely would've been my fault for not practicing proper safety. Thankfully, that didn't happen. A crappy situation all around, though, and I wish that other cop who made those dumb remarks would face some consequences for being so callous.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

I have crossed a road at a run to beat an approaching car before, and had I been struck it definitely would've been my fault for not practicing proper safety.

I'm with you on this, however, the speed of the cop is an issue. At three times the speed limit, an approaching car would reach you much faster than you would expect it too. This girl may have glanced, seen the cop in the distance, and never realized how fast he was going. Frankly, if an emergency responder if taking an action this far outside the norm, they should also be taking great care because innocent bystanders cannot be expected to anticipate the responders actions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Police are trained to drive at faster speeds for obvious reasons, but even they need to limit such higher speeds to the same constraint of reaction and vehicle performance times. I'll be positive and give the benefit of the doubt that he did try to avoid hitting her once he saw her (if he saw her at all), but I can't imagine anyone being able to react nor slow or swerve in such a setting if it was like most 25 mph zones I know of. People speed through our 25 mph subdivision at 35-40 mph and I'm just waiting for the day someone gets clipped.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So was she or was she not wearing headphones? That's something that should have been trivial to verify if true. Since it's a maybe I'm assuming she wasn't.

Also, why the fuck does a cop need to do 50mph over the limit for an overdose victim? Are we pretending he would have done anything helpful once there?

Fuck officer Kevin Dave.

[–] ikidd 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She got hit at 74mph. If you told me her ears had detached and couldn't be found, I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 15 points 10 months ago

Yeah, pretty much. The poor girl probably resembled hamburger meat.

And some people have been quick to jump on the “well why did she run across the street” talking point, but humans are really really bad at judging speed when something is coming directly at us.

Our brains perceive depth by measuring the difference between our two eyes. But when your eyes are only a few inches apart and the object is three hundred yards away, it basically looks stationary until it’s right on top of you. There hasn’t been any evolutionary advantage to being able to accurately gauge speeds from several hundred yards away, because for the vast majority of human history nothing existed that would chase you down that fast. Even when driving, you’re rarely looking directly at oncoming traffic; You’re usually off to the side slightly, so you can more accurately judge the speed of oncoming traffic by comparing it to its surroundings.

If she assumed it was going at a more reasonable speed, and couldn’t tell otherwise because it was heading right for her and depth perception failed her, then she literally wouldn’t realize her mistake until the car was right on top of her.

At the listed 74 MPH, a car would close a 300 yard gap in less than 9 seconds. That’s about how long it’d take someone to see it, go “it’s not going that fast! The speed limit is only 20 MPH and they’re maybe doing 40? I can make it,” and run out in front of it. At an average walking pace, it takes about ten seconds to cross a three lane road, so she’d probably end up riiiiiight in front of a car if it’s traveling way faster than she anticipated.

[–] spirinolas 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Someone was overdosing. If he was too slow he would loose his chance to fear for his safety and shoot him dead.

[–] vanontom 13 points 10 months ago

Exactly. There is zero chance that this guy was speeding (3x limit, in 25 zone!) just to help at an overdose emergency. We can only imagine why he was so motivated. ("Car loud, go fast?! People notice, feel special! Gun fun, maybe use!?")

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd say anyone choosing to drive 74mph in a 25mph zone can be said to have disregarded safety. And if you haven't realized you are going 74mph in a 25mph zone, you shouldn't have a license, let alone be an officer.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also, this was a police officer responding to an overdose call, I doubt he was going to administer medical assistance.

However it should be said that a 25mph road should really be designed as a 25mph road, with suitable traffic calming measures. Far too many low speed limit roads are big and wide open, practically encouraging people to speed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

However it should be said that a 25mph road should really be designed as a 25mph road, with suitable traffic calming measures. Far too many low speed limit roads are big and wide open, practically encouraging people to speed.

Sorry, but this is nonsensical. The wide road did not make that cop drive 75 miles per hour in a 25 mile per hour zone. That officer was responsible for his own actions, and would have found a way to drive at an unsafe speed regardless of how the road was designed.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hypothetically he would have been forced to go too slow to easily murder anyone with his car. He is a murderer, but traffic engineering works.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

The officer is responsible for his own actions, but responsibility isn't divied out into neat percentages.

The officer is 100% responsible for their actions and their gross excess speed. They are a highly trained driver, and they should know better. However, that doesn't mean there aren't other factors of responsibility: eg, the road being poorly designed for 25mph, while allowing 75mph as a practicable speed; the girl crossing the road without paying attention; the general attitude of police as a profession chasing drug calls as a source of point scoring, rather than serving the public good.

In particular, it is not illegal to be high on drugs. The crimes are possession and intent to supply. Having drugs in your system is not a crime, and having drugs in your system does not legally imply a crime has been committed. It might be somewhat likely that you'll find drugs with someone who has taken them, but that's just probable cause for a search, and not something an officer should be racing towards.

However, you should not be able to drive down a 25mph road at 75mph. It should feel wrong and sketchy well below that speed, and be completely impossible at that speed.

A 25mph road should not be a wide open straight road. It should force drivers to slow down to manoeuvre around traffic calming measures.

[–] ALilOff 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you ever doubt the power of unions look at the police Union.

[–] Soggy 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Most unions aren't supported by the government and given license to kill.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] FontMasterFlex 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“There is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Officer Dave was consciously disregarding safety,”

so as long as i hit someone who has ear buds in while doing 75mph in a 25mph zone, i'm in the clear. way to victim blame. what a fucking joke.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She might also have been wearing wireless earbuds that could have diminished her hearing, they noted.

Might? Really, Might? She did or didn't, and she was listening to something or didn't. Might is just guessing and just randomly throwing out accusations. She might also have been robbing a bank and the police officer might also be a pedophile. What the hell is this?

[–] Takumidesh 39 points 10 months ago

I don't see how it matters anyway, do deaf people deserve to die because they have diminished hearing?

[–] Donjuanme 22 points 10 months ago

The last two jury duty cases I was called for had the district attorney making very sure all the jurors knew that "even if the person the crime was committed to didn't want the charges pressed" and "if there's only one person saying what happened actually happened, that's all the evidence you need to know that it happened" while a non English speaking person sat in the defense side with a translator and a (I'm betting) court appointed attorney tried to defend them.

Meanwhile police are mowing people down at felony reckless driving speeds and the district attorneys are "lol, not enough evidence"

Get the fuck out of here with that cowardice.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

ACAB

Especially this guy

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It can be both: the officer could have been operating within the bounds of his responsibility, the victim could have been in a state with diminished hearing, and the tragic accident could be just that; AND the other officer could be a monumental racist shitbag who hates people and needs to lose his job and address that racism.

We can regret that this accident occured even as we hate the racist cop who disparaged the deceased and disrespected her as a person.

[–] blazeknave 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good comment. Fucking sucks in all ways, especially for her family. Poor kid.

[–] lledrtx 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kinda funny how you think she is a kid but the POS police officer thinks she was too old and therefore had "limited value".

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] BigBenis 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Over the last several years I've come to despise the police and consider them more of a menace to the general public than any criminal organization at this point. That's really all I've got to say here, I feel like there's not much more I can do other than vote for non-existent police reform policy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

ACAB

[–] Suavevillain 11 points 10 months ago

I fully understand why people find justice in their own ways outside the court system. ACAB.

[–] RaoulDook 4 points 10 months ago

Here's another relevant Guardian article:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/feb/15/us-homicides-committed-by-police-gun-violence

load more comments