this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
603 points (97.3% liked)

Today I Learned

18092 readers
712 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I always assumed credit scores were an integral and historic part of the American financial system.

They were not, they are very recent,most of your parents didn't have credit scores growing up, and as you can probably tell or at least intuit, it's mostly just a b******* scheme for those with capital to accrue more capital by invading your privacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 136 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It sucks but things were worse before, especially if you were black.

[–] [email protected] 123 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or an immigrant. Or a woman (especially if you're pregnant). Or if you lived near black people or immigrants. Or if you had long hair. Or maybe the local bank manager just didn't like you. These were all acceptable reasons to deny your loan application prior to credit scores.

They literally made decisions based on things you can't control. Banks are now legally prohibited from even asking these things. If you notice, people working at a bank will never ask "where are you from?"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck I sound like a bootlicker but the net result was that it took away some control of the rich to influence social mobility.

But rich people are living organisms and their think tanks are the smartest. They’ve already found ways around it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As time moves on, a lot of things containing racial bias have gotten more abstract. For example, we don't segregate schools by law anymore, but African-Americans do tend to live in neighborhoods together, those neighborhoods tend to have lower property values, and schools are funded by the taxes on property values. Segregation is still there, but you have to go a few layers deep to find it.

However, as its been forced to get more abstract, it's also become less effective. Without absolute prohibitions against African-Americans attending the same schools as white people, there has been more upwards mobility of African-Americans to live in better neighborhoods with better schools and end cycles of poverty. Still, it would be better if we got rid of this dumb property tax system for schools altogether.

Credit scores are the same. It abstracted away the racism. It's still there, causing unnecessary hardship, but not to the degree previous systems did. There is more room for upwards mobility, but that doesn't mean we should leave it as it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Came here to say this. Credit scores are meant to remove some of the racial and social bias from the decision making. That was the idea anyway.

[–] MotoAsh 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't mean this is how it has to be. It can be improved further.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While true, don't let perfect be the enemy of the good.

[–] MotoAsh 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Yes, and I'm only making the opposite counter-point: Don't stop doing a good thing, like fixing broken systems.

I love it how everyone enjoys pointing out the negative interpretation when it's in response to something that makes it utterly clear I mean the positive interpretation.

You may as well be saying, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", which I'm sure is not what you mean, but that's exactly what responding with a counter-view implies at this point.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's not like they didn't look through your financial history before then - they just didn't have to show their working publicly, which meant you could ne discriminated against for any number of things

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So the same now, except now all personal data is located in one place according to the rules they set, from which they can sell your data and preemptively block you or refuse to meet you to discuss your practical repayment capability.

[–] Carighan 24 points 10 months ago (9 children)

All of those could be and were done before, only it wasn't public so you had no way to also know your score.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

You're not wrong - I was just pointing out it's always been that way. The rich never played fair, they played to win.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Do they show their work now, or just a score based on a bunch of non-public calculations?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I tried to open a bank account at a credit union while homeless. Had $42k on my direct express card, finally on SSI, lump sum was for the previous year while unable to work.

No debts, never used a credit card. Couldn't open a bank account. Had to go thru a program that assigned me a fake credit card debt that I had to pay off for 6 months to get my credit score high enough.

Credit scores are a scam.

[–] stoly 16 points 10 months ago

Sorry but that credit union sucks and you needed to move on. Credit unions should never deny someone an checking or savings account if they do not have a history of abuse.

[–] morgan_423 11 points 10 months ago

Indeed. As evidenced by the fact that doing things that are money-smart (in general, stuff that amounts to avoiding debt) is actually harmful to a credit score. The powers that be want you to consume on borrowed funds.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

This is my point, thank you for sharing your story.

If you are injured, not lucky or born into less fortunate circumstances, this credit system will stop you from taking control of your life.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

It's depressing what happens when we give corporations the leeway to do whatever they want, isn't it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] markr 55 points 10 months ago (33 children)

It’s our version of China’s social credit score.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] sosodev 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Credit scores didn’t exist but credit bureaus date back to the mid 1800s in the USA. Also, as others have mentioned creditors would do their due diligence and try to assert that you would be able to pay back your loans by doing many of the same things they do now.

This really isn’t some new, crazy concept like you’re making it out to be. The score has only simplified the process.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Got_Bent 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Back in the seventies/early eighties, I remember my grandmother getting financial privilege by showing the check numbers in her checkbook, which were in the high thousands.

If you ran around bouncing checks, you would get cut off long before that and have to start over at the dreaded check number 101.

Such simpler times.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Remember when there wasn't a proprietary algortithm giving everyone a social credit score and instead you had to get a letter from an existing member to signify your trustworthiness?

I dont like the proprietary nature of credit algos, but I'm not a fan of the letter system either

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Tbf personal credit cards have only been around since a couple decades before that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But they primarily use credit scores to deny mortgages to people. Getting a CC with a bad credit score is very easy. The rates will just suck. And we've had mortgages, car loans and business loans a lot longer.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Just wait till you learn what they used to deny people mortgages before the invention of credit scores.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hperrin 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Correct. Credit scores are bullshit.

The idea is fine, but when they’re run by the credit bureaus, they’re subject to extreme corruption. Even if run by the government, as they should be, they’d be subject to extreme corruption.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dohpaz42 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

What will blow your mind is that there is now an insurance score that insurance companies use similar to a credit score.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Trashcan 15 points 10 months ago (17 children)

In Norway having loads of credit cards is negative for getting a house loan as it is potential debt that goes against your payment ability for the house loan.

Meaning we do have a credit score system for getting loans and more stuff on various credit solutions, but credit cards works against larger loans.

Which can be a pain in the ass when you want to buy a house/apartment and have credit cards that might deny you the last bit of money to win the bidding war...

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] jadedwench 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I will just leave this here. Your employers can snitch on you as well and just give all of your paystubs to...Equifax. It was shocking to see which ones did and which ones did not.

https://employees.theworknumber.com/employee-data-freeze

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The first time I saw this I was shocked. Every single paycheck of mine is there and there's basically nothing you can do about it without having negative credit impacts for having manually disabled it. Why on earth is this opt-out rather than opt-in? Then it wouldn't look like you're trying to hide something if you value your privacy at all.

It's crazy this is legal. So dystopian.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack 11 points 10 months ago

The whole financial system is only about 50 years old

[–] stoly 10 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Credit scores have existed for decades, as the article states. It's specifically the FICO system that was started in 1989.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DesertMagma 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] steelrat 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wait until you hear about Dunn & Bradstreet and Moody's

[–] LemmyIsFantastic 8 points 10 months ago (10 children)

FICO is kinda stupid in some ways but with responsibility it's not hard to get a decent rate/favorable score. Yes at the top end is dumb you need to open more credit but in practice that's not hard to do assuming you aren't just forced by circumstances to just live off credit.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›