this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
118 points (91.5% liked)

Games

32928 readers
2068 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rumors of a February release just got shot down :(

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echo64 29 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Honestly, at this point, they should really just save whatever for a sequel. It's been two years. As a reminder (though there are extenuating circumstances here), Dark Souls 2 was 2014, and Dark Souls 3 was 2016.

I guess the new reality is that it takes six years to make a game and three years between expansions. I think I'd just prefer smaller games and smaller dev cycles.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They released armored core 6 since elden ring but no one cares for some reason.

[–] Viking_Hippie -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Probably because 90% of Western gamers and 99.999% of humanity never heard about the Armored Core series in the first place?

That's the one about hard apples right? 😛

[–] Sanctus 11 points 10 months ago

Armored Core is one of their oldest running IPs and a series I have been playing since 2nd installment. AC6 was without a doubt the best one. Highly recommend.

[–] Daveyborn 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This, but wasn't dark souls 2 a different team than 1 and 3?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Different lead for sure

[–] FooBarrington 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Why? With a DLC they can expand on weaker areas and introduce interesting advanced mechanics, whereas a sequel needs a lot more groundwork and can't expand on existing story threads as easily without some repetition.

It's such a good game that I'd prefer more of it to a sequel, at least right now. Make the sequel it's own thing that's not burdened by having to finish all the unfinished stories.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Nintendo took 6 years for a mere DLC for BotW.

[–] rambaroo 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd prefer a bloodborne remaster over ER DLC

[–] LolcatXTREME 2 points 10 months ago

Fromsoft probably wouldn’t be the studio remastering bloodborne anyway, so they could happen concurrently

[–] Sanctus 20 points 10 months ago

Thats okay FromSoft, you go when you feel like it. I will instantly pick ER back up.

[–] De_Narm 17 points 10 months ago

They probably need some more time to make the new swamp extra swamp-y.

But in all seriousness, Miyazaki hasn't disappointed me yet. He can take all the time he wants to, I'll be there to get it once it drops. Be that tomorrow or in several years.

[–] dinckelman 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A delayed game/dlc is always better than a rushed one

[–] jroid8 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A delayed game/dlc is always better than crunch time (sacrificing your humanity and working 18h a day)

[–] dinckelman 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s a whole separate can of worms. I don’t have any respect for studios, that actually force people to work hours like this, just to hit some arbitrary deadline, that they imposed on themselves

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Larian really knocked it out of the park having 3 studios around the globe so they can still have a 24hr workflow without pushing everyone to do overtime. I really want to know what their handover procedures are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I kinda figured those rumors were bullshit. They may be secretive, but Fromsoft still wouldn't just quietly release a major dlc for one of the biggest titles they've ever made.

Shit must be massive for it to take this long, though, without much news other than a title, and two updates that they are still working on it.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 8 points 10 months ago

I'm currently playing Elden Ring and it's so freaking massive. It's incredible what From soft choice to include. There's whole areas that are completely gated for a hard-to-find side quest, that you'll only discover if you happen to follow a guide.

Any other company would have chopped the content and put it in a DLC.

And here they're like, "We got more just wait."

[–] Suavevillain 6 points 10 months ago

Take your time. There is no rush.

[–] _sideffect 4 points 10 months ago

Sounds like it'll be pretty big and worthwhile

[–] Krudler 3 points 10 months ago

I played ER 3x no-wiki... I am fine with a decent break, it will hopefully make the new content that much more savoury

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I just finished it the first time and hoped to play the DLC soon, because I usually don't come back to a game for DLC. Quite disappointing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Something makes me think this is not going to be your typical DLC. I wish they would have given the entire industry the middle finger and said something like, "This will be an expansion pack, in contrast to all the half-hour extras that piss producers push as DLC."

Because honestly, this long of a development time for anything less than an expansion, like the old days where you get 50-100% more game, seems crazy.