this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
249 points (97.0% liked)

News

23656 readers
3059 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The locomotive of a cargo train derailed in northern Colorado early Wednesday, spilling hundreds of gallons of diesel, authorities said.

The Great Western Railway locomotive did not tip over when it went off the rails at a switch in the tracks just before 1 a.m. but a fuel tank was punctured, the Loveland Fire Rescue Authority said in a Facebook post. The spill was contained and did not get into any waterways, it said.

No one was injured in the derailment, which happened near a sugar factory in an area not far from some homes, Battalion Chief Kevin Hessler said. The other locomotive and three cars carrying sugar did not derail, he said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MinorLaceration 54 points 10 months ago (25 children)

Not to minimize this, but could have been much worse. 100's of gallons instead of 1000's. Train remained upright. Sounds like they got lucky.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We should not focus on gratitude that it wasn't worse. Everything could always be worse. The point is to make things better.

Spilled oil is objectively bad, and to be harshly criticized, every time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To address this a bit further up, where more eyes can see it: yes, be pissed that this happened at all, but it's absolutely okay to be thankful it wasn't worse. To not be thankful it was hundreds and not thousands, tens of thousands, is psychotic. Don't let that keep you from your anger at these companies, though. The derailment still happened, fuel was still spilled, don't forget it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] JackFrostNCola 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You beat me too it! I was just going to link this since I just watched it.

tl;dw train regulations have been stripped back so much that government regulators inspect just 1% of train operations and have no idea where any trains are or what they're carrying, leaving following regulations up to the corporations. The largest corporation has placed "safety" as #4 in their list of priorities and runs their trains with just 2 overworked employees who regularly state they have no time to check that the train is running properly and warn that a derailment of a train carrying fuel will flatten a major american city some day soon if regulations aren't changed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

You know who owns the rails? Fucking Warren Buffet, like that cunt needs any more fucking wealth.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

It sure is a good thing we didn’t give those train engineers enough vacation time and sick days! /s

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

I guess they didn't see John Oliver's episode about this.

[–] psmgx 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Hundreds ain't great but the average train these days has 20000 tons of cargo behind it -- could have been a lot worse.

Derailments are pretty common, actually. Like dozens to hundreds a year depending on the size of the company. I suspect a few incidents last year have made the news extra sensitive.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most derailments are basically just the train falling off the track, very slightly. This was a full on train crash.

[–] MinorLaceration 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From the article and video, this seems to be one of those times it slightly came off the track. There doesn't seem to have been collision and the train remained upright.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, it's kind of borderline imo. It certainly suffered some damage, rather than a low speed step off that simply needs a crane to put things back into place.

If you do something with your car and it suffers damage, it's hard not to call that a crash. You might be able to drive it afterwards while holding the steering wheel at an odd angle, but you've still suffered crash-level damage.

[–] MinorLaceration 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, there's damage, but the train didn't crash into anything. If I drove into the shoulder of the road and ran over a piece of debris, I could easily damage my car, but I didn't crash the car.

There's not really anything subjective here, the train didn't crash into anything. It derailed and suffered damage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If I drove into the shoulder of the road

See that's technically a crash. You collided with the curb. It might not be a crash into another vehicle or into something like a tree or a lamppost, but you're still crashing into something.

In this case, the train collided with the ground, after falling off the rails. A low speed derailment would have no damage - akin to spinning out in an open road or something - but if you hit something and cause damage that breaches some threshold.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Roads with shoulders don't typically have curbs.

[–] MinorLaceration 1 points 10 months ago

Driving over the lane lines does not involve hitting a curb. As I said, in this hypothetical scenario I drove into the shoulder and debris damaged my car. I did not crash.

There's nothing subjective about this incident. The train derailed. The train remained upright. The train did not collide with an object. The train was damaged. Honestly, you're really doing some mental gymnastics to rationalize your decision to call it a collision. If you're just going to do whatever you need to do to convince yourself that it was a collision, nothing I'm going to say will change your mind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In the US, maybe. Last derailment we had in Czechia was in 2010. Germany had it last year, but it's still less than once a year.

[–] psmgx 3 points 10 months ago

I don't buy that. Unless you define "derailments" as "giant catastrophe". Trains regularly slip off tracks, fall over, and occasionally catch fire, even in Europe.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1128848/accidents-on-european-rail-networks-by-country/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am curious about the amount of rail in those countries vs the US. I know Europe likes their passenger trains a ton more than the US, but the US loves freight trains, and that seems to be where most of the derailments happen.

If the United States has, like, 20x the freight rail/trains, it would make sense for them to have 20x more derailments, essentially adjusting for population of freight trains. Not to give a pass to the States, for sure, but knowing this number would be a bit more helpful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

According to wikipedia:

Czechia has 9,567 km.
USA has 220,044 km.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow thanks for the information. I think this pretty well illustrates the point. The states have 22 times the rail as Czechia, so we'd expect Czechia to have 1/22 the incidents the states have. Now we need the number of incidents in each country and we can make a proper comparison.

I don't expect you to provide that, though, you've been more than enough help for a villain of such infamy miss Bonny ;p

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

You're welcome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Mainly because the corporations won’t invest in safety systems

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Or hire enough people for these super-long trains

[–] Nudding 8 points 10 months ago

Same as a school shooting, this isn't news anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I assure you diesel fuel is great for the environment, it makes it go faster.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't think that's true; diesel fuel isn't red.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

You see, the environment without fuel will not be able to go anywhere. By adding fuel to the environment it is now able to leave at highway speeds.

[–] squidman 2 points 10 months ago

It's got what the environment craves!

[–] moshankey 3 points 10 months ago

Where’s BoBo? It is Colorado. Is she still blaming Buttigieg for the woes of American transportation?

load more comments
view more: next ›