ggppjj

joined 2 years ago
[–] ggppjj 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Those bastards! Lmao, glad you got it.

[–] ggppjj 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They killed your channel!

[–] ggppjj 4 points 2 days ago

That's called a sneakernet. Although, if you're talking actual pigeons, you may be interested in RFC1149.

[–] ggppjj 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm gonna teach you a lesson on improv: "yes, and".

[–] ggppjj 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] ggppjj 3 points 1 week ago

For me the main benefit would be that I really like 3D printing and I'd rather not have the waste, so I get from my end it's more of a niche request and I'm fine with where things are.

[–] ggppjj 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I've talked with this person in the past, they are very reasonable in general, although I disagree with their stance on not offering the hardware only and allowing the user to 3D print their own case. They currently don't want to do that because they can control the quality of prints that get shipped with their product, and anticipate (based on previous experience IIRC) an increase in support needs for self-printed cases that they both aren't willing to bear and aren't willing to allow. They want this to be sold as a finished product that happens to include some 3D printed parts that you CAN swap out later at your own risk, which makes enough sense even though it's not how I would prefer it.

[–] ggppjj 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mod Henry into BG3

[–] ggppjj 2 points 2 weeks ago

A crucial part of your statement is that it knows that it's untrue, which it is incapable of. I would agree with you if it were actually capable of understanding.

[–] ggppjj 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

A false statement would be me saying that the color of a light that I cannot see and have never seen that is currently red is actually green without knowing. I am just as easily probably right as I am probably wrong, statistics are involved.

A lie would be me knowing that the color of a light that I am currently looking at is currently red and saying that it is actually green. No statistics, I've done this intentionally and the only outcome of my decision to act was that I spoke a falsehood.

AIs can generate false statements, yes, but they are not capable of lying. Lying requires cognition, which LLMs are, by their own admission and by the admission of the companies developing them, at the very least not currently capable of, and personally I believe that it's likely that LLMs never will be.

[–] ggppjj 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ask chatgpt, I'm done arguing effective consciousness vs actual consciousness.

https://chatgpt.com/share/67c64160-308c-8011-9bdf-c53379620e40

view more: next ›