this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
231 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18080 readers
3328 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Allen Weisselberg perjury deal could be “big nail in the Trump civil fraud coffin,” says Andrew Weissmann

Allen Weisselberg, the former longtime chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, is negotiating a deal with Manhattan prosecutors to plead guilty to perjury, according to The New York Times.

The deal would require Weisselberg to admit that he lied while testifying at Trump’s recent civil fraud trial and in an earlier interview with the New York attorney general’s office, sources told the outlet.

The reported deal comes after a long pressure campaign by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose team sought Weisselberg’s cooperation in several investigations into Trump’s business and alleged election crimes. Trump is scheduled for trial in Manhattan in March in the 2016 hush-money case.

...

“Why has Judge Engoron not issued his decision on the Trump civil fraud? One reason could well be the news that the Trump chief financial officer may be pleading to lying to Judge Engoron in a way to help Trump,” tweeted former Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann. “And the Judge is waiting for that to support his decision against DJT. This [would] be another big nail in the Trump civil fraud coffin.”

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fapper_McFapper 68 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.

[–] eran_morad 69 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s cool n shit, but the Republic is dying and we need Lady Justice to fucking haul ass.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] thesporkeffect 56 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a real precise window of time the wheels of justice have to finish grinding before they hit the concrete barrier at the end of the road

[–] negativenull 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] lickmygiggle 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

JUST HIT THE FUCKING BOLLARD

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Did you scroll away too fast? Man, I can’t believe it sheared that engine block clean in half!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Pedestrian barriers HATE this!!! Avoid large concrete bollards with this one simple trick!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How does one reconcile that statement with the aphorism "Justice delayed is justice denied"?

[–] hogunner 7 points 5 months ago

Justice is always delayed otherwise it’s just retaliation.

[–] cm0002 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It is an aphorism after all, it's missing a ton of nuance.

Are we delaying justice temporarily to ensure it sticks or covers all crime that came to light late? I wouldn't say that's justice denied.

Are we delaying justice temporarily to ensure it's applied properly? I wouldn't say that's justice denied either

Now if we're talking about delaying justice as a way to cover for the defendant eg constantly delaying proceedings till people forget about it and then silently dropping it then hell yeah that's justice denied

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Ken Paxton says “howdy”. Somehow, all of his trials just find endless delays.

The US judicial system just delays justice against the rich and powerful - the rest of us get railroaded to hell.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

Tell that to the people who rot in prison for decades before being exonerated and receive little to no compensation when they're freed (if they're freed at all).

[–] Keineanung 6 points 5 months ago

Fapper_McFapper is right.

[–] Dr_Chocolate 5 points 5 months ago

"The mills of the gods grind slowly, but they grind exceeding fine."

[–] DarkDecay 63 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Only the best people for trump lmao

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago

He defines “best” differently than we do. As far as I can tell it means “most willing to do the corrupt shit I tell them to”

[–] SinningStromgald 6 points 5 months ago

He does get the best people at being the worst at whatever he is hiring them to do.

[–] SinningStromgald 2 points 5 months ago

He does get the best people at being the worst at whatever it is he is hiring them to do.

[–] thisorthatorwhatever 55 points 5 months ago (3 children)

If you do enough crime, it's too hard to prosecute because no one knows where to start?

[–] Bocky 3 points 5 months ago

One step at a time, till death do us part

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Prosecutors hate this one simple trick!

[–] Additional_Prune 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, multiple bankruptcies and lawsuits, a $25 million fraud settlement, CFO caught criming, charity fraud, four separate trials...I'm starting to think Trump and company are hinky.

[–] hansl 7 points 5 months ago

But surely 74 million votes can’t be wrong, right? /s

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Calling it now, Trump will be insolvent after Engorgon's decision.

Chapter 13, not Chapter 11

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't be surprised, he was rumored to be almost broke before he ran in 2016. He has made millions off his cult members, and all the foreign nationals that just wanted to fly 1/2 way around the world to spend money at a Trump hotel for "no reason", but he has been bleeding money since losing in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Not only that, but he can't use money from his political campaign for his legal battles. I think the latest figure from the court monitor put him at having $400mil on hand (with no Trump Org business transactions in 14 months), so with all the potential fines coming, plus anyone he owes money to, he's very likely insolvent and will have to sell off assets in a hurry or file for bankruptcy.

...or chance it and dip into his political funds, which surely are not being watched by multiple watchdog groups. /s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, he already got caught paying Stormy and the secret baby momma out of campaign funds pre-2016. And he doesn't have any of his "people" for that kind of thing anymore because they have all gotten in legal trouble as well. But I also have to imagine after George Santos nobody would be jumping to put a bullseye on their back doing the same thing.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 8 points 5 months ago

"I'm going to get elected and pardon both of us if we're caught" goes a long way with an idiot that graduated at the bottom of their class at law school and otherwise has no real future that comports with their ego.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just because it's something is illegal doesn't mean he can't do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Oh, definitely. But since he's already being strung over a barrel for fraud and has a business monitor, I'm sure that gives even him at least the tiniest pause.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Ups the ante on winning. If he wins, he'll be untouchable as enough of Congress still remembers the flavor of his balls, and will therefore not impeach him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Oh! Yes, that would explain the delayed decision; I hadn't considered that!