this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
231 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Allen Weisselberg perjury deal could be “big nail in the Trump civil fraud coffin,” says Andrew Weissmann

Allen Weisselberg, the former longtime chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, is negotiating a deal with Manhattan prosecutors to plead guilty to perjury, according to The New York Times.

The deal would require Weisselberg to admit that he lied while testifying at Trump’s recent civil fraud trial and in an earlier interview with the New York attorney general’s office, sources told the outlet.

The reported deal comes after a long pressure campaign by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whose team sought Weisselberg’s cooperation in several investigations into Trump’s business and alleged election crimes. Trump is scheduled for trial in Manhattan in March in the 2016 hush-money case.

...

“Why has Judge Engoron not issued his decision on the Trump civil fraud? One reason could well be the news that the Trump chief financial officer may be pleading to lying to Judge Engoron in a way to help Trump,” tweeted former Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann. “And the Judge is waiting for that to support his decision against DJT. This [would] be another big nail in the Trump civil fraud coffin.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Calling it now, Trump will be insolvent after Engorgon's decision.

Chapter 13, not Chapter 11

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't be surprised, he was rumored to be almost broke before he ran in 2016. He has made millions off his cult members, and all the foreign nationals that just wanted to fly 1/2 way around the world to spend money at a Trump hotel for "no reason", but he has been bleeding money since losing in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Not only that, but he can't use money from his political campaign for his legal battles. I think the latest figure from the court monitor put him at having $400mil on hand (with no Trump Org business transactions in 14 months), so with all the potential fines coming, plus anyone he owes money to, he's very likely insolvent and will have to sell off assets in a hurry or file for bankruptcy.

...or chance it and dip into his political funds, which surely are not being watched by multiple watchdog groups. /s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, he already got caught paying Stormy and the secret baby momma out of campaign funds pre-2016. And he doesn't have any of his "people" for that kind of thing anymore because they have all gotten in legal trouble as well. But I also have to imagine after George Santos nobody would be jumping to put a bullseye on their back doing the same thing.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 8 points 10 months ago

"I'm going to get elected and pardon both of us if we're caught" goes a long way with an idiot that graduated at the bottom of their class at law school and otherwise has no real future that comports with their ego.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just because it's something is illegal doesn't mean he can't do it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Oh, definitely. But since he's already being strung over a barrel for fraud and has a business monitor, I'm sure that gives even him at least the tiniest pause.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Ups the ante on winning. If he wins, he'll be untouchable as enough of Congress still remembers the flavor of his balls, and will therefore not impeach him.